How Does CPM, Takt, and Last Planner Tie Together?

How CPM, Takt, and the Last Planner System Work Together

Many construction professionals struggle to see how different scheduling and planning methodologies connect. Critical Path Method (CPM), Takt Construction Theory (TCT), and the Last Planner System (LPS) are often viewed as separate and unrelated. However, they function as parts of a unified system when structured correctly.

This blog provides a clear breakdown of how these systems integrate and why understanding their connections is essential for successful project management.

Takt Planning as the Foundation:

Takt Planning should serve as the foundation of an effective scheduling system. When implemented properly, it naturally incorporates key principles from multiple scheduling methods, including:

• Location-based scheduling.
• Line of balance scheduling.
• Concepts from Gantt charts.
• Elements of CPM.
• Lean principles and the Theory of Constraints.

Takt Planning brings all these elements together into a streamlined system, creating a structured, flow-based schedule that optimizes work execution.

The Importance of Preconstruction Planning:

Preconstruction planning has long been recognized as a critical factor in project success. A well-developed plan ensures that every aspect of the project is mapped out before construction begins. The book How Big Things Get Done emphasizes that projects do not fail midway; they fail from the start due to poor planning.

By using Takt Planning in preconstruction, teams can establish a clear production plan that minimizes disruptions once work begins in the field.

The Role of CPM in the System:

Despite its widespread use, CPM often receives criticism for being impractical as a real-world scheduling tool. However, since CPM remains a contractual requirement on many projects, it is important to understand how to use it effectively.

• CPM should function as a summary schedule rather than a detailed execution plan.
• The Takt Plan should be developed first, with key data exported into CPM to satisfy contractual requirements.
• CPM should be used primarily for AS-built reporting, tracking completed work rather than managing future tasks.

Traditional CPM analysis methods, such as forensic delay analysis and fragmenting, often provide little actionable insight beyond confirming that a project is behind schedule. The typical CPM-based responses—adding labor, increasing overtime, or crashing the schedule—rarely lead to meaningful improvements.

Integrating the Last Planner System (LPS):

LPS focuses on collaborative short-term planning with trade partners, ensuring that work is ready before execution begins. However, for LPS to function properly, it must be supported by:

• A solid preconstruction plan.
• A Takt-based production schedule.

LPS integrates with Takt Planning in the following ways:

1. Six-week lookahead: Upcoming tasks are filtered from the Takt Plan to align with trade partner coordination.
2. Weekly work plan: Selected tasks are converted into commitments from trade teams.
3. Daily planning: On-site work is tracked in real-time, ensuring alignment with the overall production schedule.

Since the Takt Plan itself is developed collaboratively with trade partners, the LPS process is not about enforcing a rigid schedule. Instead, it ensures that the plan aligns with how the trades have agreed to work.

When implemented with Takt, LPS allows for more effective tracking of key performance indicators, such as:

• Perfect handoff percentage.
• Roadblock removal efficiency.
• Remaining buffer ratio.

The Role of Advanced Work Packaging (AWP):

AWP ensures that trade teams have everything they need before beginning their work. This includes:

• Defining clear work areas and paths of construction.
• Aligning supply chains with work execution.
• Providing installation work packages to foremen.

Since Takt Planning already incorporates location-based scheduling and procurement alignment, AWP naturally fits into the system, further reducing downtime and inefficiencies.

Using Scrum for Problem-Solving:

Scrum provides a structured approach to problem-solving within the project management team. It involves maintaining a Scrum board with four key categories:

1. Backlog.
2. Sprint backlog.
3. Work in progress.
4. Completed tasks.

The project team, including project managers, superintendents, project engineers, and field engineers, conducts daily stand-up meetings to move tasks through these stages.

While LPS focuses on production planning, Scrum ensures that project management issues are resolved quickly and efficiently, improving overall workflow on-site.

Bringing It All Together:

Rather than viewing these methodologies as separate, they should be seen as layers of an optimized system:

• Takt serves as the foundation, providing a structured, flow-based production plan.
• CPM functions as the summary schedule, fulfilling contract requirements without dictating daily execution.
• LPS drives short-term coordination, ensuring that trade partners are aligned and prepared.
• AWP optimizes work execution, reducing inefficiencies through better planning and procurement.
• Scrum enables rapid issue resolution, keeping project management teams focused and efficient.

When combined effectively, these systems create a cohesive, efficient, and highly productive approach to construction scheduling.