The Last Planner®️ System – Part 3

Read 4 min

The Last Planner System is evolving, and part of that process includes reviewing benchmark documents. In 2020, a benchmark was released that provided updates and recommendations for how Last Planner could be improved. While the academic style of these documents can sometimes be dry, there are some important insights that deserve attention.

One of the key elements emphasized is detailed task breakdowns. This means understanding not just the overall phases but the processes, operations, and specific steps required to finish work. The principle of full kit applies here. Work must be fully prepared and roadblock free before it begins. Without this level of preparation, crews are left exposed, commitments become unreliable, and promises lose meaning.

Reliable promises are at the heart of Last Planner. They are not casual agreements. A trade partner must make a reasoned assessment of their capacity and capability to perform the task within the required timeframe. The more senses and tools that are brought into this process, the more reliable the promise becomes. Visualizing the task, using 2D or 3D information, walking the zone, and confirming logistics all lead to stronger commitments.

The benchmark also reinforced the need for visual controls. These must be clear, up to date, and measurable. Visual tools that reflect reality support transparency and prevent wishful thinking. Alongside these, countermeasures must be part of the system. Percent plan complete and reasons for variance should feed into a plan to check the adjusted cycle. When tasks are broken down by time and location, teams can actually learn from the data and implement effective adjustments.

Look ahead planning remains a central element. It is where constraints and roadblocks are uncovered and cleared so that work can proceed smoothly. Long lead items, equipment, labor, and strategies must all align. A practical way to strengthen this process is to deliberately set aside time in the weekly meeting for trade partners to identify issues. A simple prompt like asking each partner to find at least one reason why the work cannot proceed often surfaces roadblocks that would otherwise go unnoticed.

The 2020 benchmark also suggested integrating planning and control more tightly. This means not only creating plans but ensuring that those plans translate into execution and field control. Target value delivery was recommended as a guiding model, keeping the focus on value and outcomes rather than just tasks.

Another key insight was the importance of structuring work for flow. While the document did not fully explain takt planning, it did call for work packaging that allows seamless progression from zone to zone. This is a clear acknowledgment that flow-based methods like takt are essential to elevating Last Planner practices.

Critical tasks were also emphasized. Rather than focusing only on traditional critical path activities, the benchmark suggested prioritizing critical chain activities and ensuring that commitments are directed there. This is where metrics like perfect handoff percentage become more useful than percent plan complete. A project may appear to be performing well with high PPC, but if handoffs are broken or delayed in critical areas, flow is disrupted.

Continuous learning was another highlighted theme. Failures must be analyzed, countermeasures tested, and improvements made in real time. This feedback loop is what ensures the system continues to improve rather than stagnating.

In summary, the 2020 benchmark sharpened Last Planner by focusing on integrated planning and control, value delivery, adaptability, and flow-based work structuring. While the benchmarks offer high-level direction, detailed methods like those documented in the takt planning and takt control books provide practical guidance for implementation.

Key Takeaway

Reliable promises, clear visual controls, and structured flow are essential to Last Planner. The 2020 benchmark emphasized breaking work down, preparing with full kit, and using feedback loops to keep commitments reliable and projects on track.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our YouTube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

Posted in All

The Last Planner®️ System – Part 4

Read 5 min

The Last Planner System has gone through a detailed review in this series, and now it is time to wrap it all together. My goal is to take these concepts, combine them with real field experience, and create a Last Planner implementation guide that is clear, structured, and full of practical visuals. This way, people can learn directly from tested experimentation and avoid the common pitfalls that weaken results.

One of the biggest issues in current guidance is the way the framework is described through the words should, can, will, and did. At first glance, this seems simple. The problem is that most master schedules only express what should happen, without showing what is actually possible. CPM schedules do this well enough, but they miss reality. They tell you what the demand is without reflecting what the system can achieve.

A better approach is to start with a macro level takt plan that establishes both should and can together. This way, the master schedule is not just a statement of demand but a realistic flow-based representation of what is possible. From there, pull planning confirms the feasibility and introduces buffers. That becomes the true can. Weekly work planning then produces a reliable will, and if the system has been set up properly, the did should result in close to 100 percent plan complete. Without this structure, everything downstream is weakened.

Work structuring is another critical area. By definition, it answers how work will be sequenced, assigned, and handed off. It asks whether consecutive crews will flow smoothly or whether buffers will be needed. In reality, the most effective way to handle work structuring is through takt planning. No other approach consistently creates flow across zones and crews. Even methods like advanced work packaging attempt to align supply chains but stop short of true zone-based flow optimization.

This same misunderstanding shows up in how phases are described. Many treat phases as simply dates on a calendar. In truth, a phase is a grouping of zones tied to a specific scope of work, and it should be structured through takt to optimize throughput. This is how milestones are reliably met.

The concepts of shielding and screening also show the limits of current practice. Shielding is about protecting crews from uncertainty by only placing quality assignments into the weekly plan. The problem is that this happens far too late. Proper pull planning done months before the phase start already resolves sequencing, flow, and preparation. If that work is skipped, shielding becomes an attempt to fix symptoms rather than root causes. Similarly, screening should not be about pushing or delaying tasks reactively. The planning of preparation should have already addressed roadblocks and constraints.

Another overlooked concept is workable backlog. The way it is sometimes defined creates confusion. In reality, a workable backlog consists of areas that are not on the critical chain but are ready for work. Crews can shift into these areas if delays occur, or small teams can maintain progress there and then rejoin the main flow when needed. This provides swing capacity and buffers the production system without breaking rhythm.

First run studies are one of the most valuable tools for preparation. By testing or simulating an operation before it begins, the team learns what cycle times are realistic and how methods should be refined. These can be done through mock ups, past project observation, or even controlled trials. Too often, teams wait until full production to discover inefficiencies. A simple first run study prevents wasted time and ensures readiness.

The final point that must be made is that CPM schedules cannot be paired with Last Planner. They simply do not work together. CPM creates the illusion of control without flow, and it undermines everything downstream. Takt, pull planning, and flow based systems provide the structure needed for reliable promises and continuous improvement.

As I finish this series, the goal is clear. I am going to consolidate these learnings, remove the outdated visuals, and publish a Last Planner implementation guide. This will combine tested field experience with proven methods so that anyone can adopt the system with clarity and confidence. The end result should be a tool that elevates the industry and gives builders the ability to plan, commit, and deliver at the highest level.

Key Takeaway

Last Planner only works when paired with flow based methods like takt. Reliable results come from combining should and can at the master schedule, structuring work for flow, preparing early through pull planning, and supporting with workable backlog and first run studies.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our YouTube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

Posted in All

Total Participation

Read 4 min

The Power of Total Participation in Construction

As I prepare for the upcoming Japan study trip, I find myself reflecting deeply on the lessons we can learn from Japanese culture and lean thinking. Japan has a remarkable history of productivity, respect for people, and total participation that continues to shape the way industries operate today. These lessons are not just historical curiosities; they are principles that can transform the way we work in construction right now.

During World War II, the United States achieved something extraordinary. Women and older citizens stepped into factories while men went off to fight. To help them succeed, the Bureau of Labor quickly created training manuals that taught what we might now call lean methods. These methods worked so well that in just one year, the United States ramped up industrial production to levels unmatched in human history. This was a revolution in production.

But when the war ended, the men who returned from overseas did not bring back those lessons. They were not trained in these principles and often dismissed the need for them, believing victory alone proved they could achieve anything. Meanwhile, the Japanese, humbled after the war, learned those same principles from us. They embraced the lessons of Dr. W. Edwards Deming and other thought leaders, combined them with their own culture of discipline and unity, and created what we now know as lean. Ironically, the lean movement we admire in Japan today is built on concepts that originated here in the United States but were forgotten by us.

The Japanese success story is rooted in humility and total participation. Their culture, shaped by rice farming and island life, values tight-knit communities and shared responsibility. Even in elementary school, Japanese children learn to serve food, wait for others, avoid waste, and clean up together. Respect and teamwork are built into daily life from the beginning. These values extend into their professional lives, where factories, construction sites, and companies thrive on collective effort.

This is where the power of total participation becomes clear. In construction, our projects cannot run properly without it. When everyone participates, from leaders to workers to trade partners, the entire system improves. Morning worker huddles, for example, bring everyone together to align on safety, cleanliness, and productivity. Foreman huddles create opportunities for shared planning and coordination. Visual systems ensure transparency and accountability. Even social events, like barbecues on site, strengthen unity and remind people they are part of one team.

But here is where we often fail in construction. Too many projects treat trades as separate entities, giving them the freedom to opt out of critical routines like huddles or collaborative planning. That mindset does not work. Trade partners are part of one united team, and participating in these systems is not optional. Lean principles cannot take root unless total participation is required.

This does not mean we enforce these practices harshly or disrespectfully. Quite the opposite. We can and should communicate with them with respect, invite collaboration, and build relationships. But there must never be a situation where collaboration ends with people deciding against holding a foreman huddle or skipping worker huddles. Total participation is the foundation. Without it, lean is impossible.

Look at the difference between manufacturing and construction. In manufacturing, no one is debating the value of flow, one-piece systems, or eliminating constraints. They are aligned, disciplined, and far ahead of us because they understand and practice total participation every single day. In construction, by contrast, we still argue about CPM and resist tried-and-true principles that could transform our industry.

The truth is simple. Until we build total participation into our culture, we will not achieve lean construction. Total participation is not just a nice concept. It is the non-negotiable requirement for improving safety, efficiency, and overall success. If we want our projects to thrive and our industry to progress, we must learn from Japan, from history, and from each other.

On we go.

Key Takeaway
Construction will only advance when we require total participation. Lean cannot thrive until everyone on site is engaged, aligned, and working as one team.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our YouTube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

Posted in All

What Are The Risks Associated With Construction Projects?

Read 4 min

Managing Hidden Risks in Construction Projects

What are the risks associated with construction projects? In this blog, I’m going to walk you through some of the top ones and answer common questions that have come up on this topic. This is brand new content on risk management that I think you’ll find valuable.

Too often, teams fill out a risk register once and never look at it again. Meanwhile, threats start happening, the team spirals out of control, and suddenly you’re dealing with unevenness and overburden. In this blog, I’m not only talking about obvious risks like safety or weather, I’m talking about the hidden risks that you typically can’t see, but that can really damage your project.

Establishing a General Process

In one of the most popular blogs on this channel, I explained how to run a project step by step. It included:

  • Establishing a plan.
  • Knowing the owner’s conditions of satisfaction.
  • Communicating them clearly to the team.
  • Assembling the right team, with spatial or geographical control.
  • Tracking each area with the right key performance indicators.

A key point from that blog: risks must be continuously monitored, with one person ultimately responsible (OPER) for each area. Once you have the right people in the right seats, the challenge becomes staying focused like driving a car.

There are two simple driving rules:

  1. Don’t hit the car in front of you.
  2. Don’t drift out of your lane.

On projects, we often get distracted by secondary things (like turn signals in the driving analogy) instead of staying focused on what really matters: avoiding the major risks right in front of us.

The Most Important Risks

Yes, safety is always a core value and must remain at the top of the list. But beyond that, the biggest project risks are often the ones you cannot see without proper systems. That’s why visual production plans, macro-level Takt plans, look-aheads, and weekly work plans are so critical.

Your risks are not some far-off, uncontrollable event. They’re the constraints and bottlenecks you can map visually, such as:

  • Trade bottlenecks.
  • Zone bottlenecks.
  • Batch size bottlenecks.
  • Precedence bottlenecks (when one activity can’t proceed until others are finished).

By visualizing these, you uncover risks before they disrupt the project.

Two Categories of Risks

  1. Catastrophic Risks – These are the big, visible risks that could cause severe damage, like a crane collapse, a trench cave-in, or a fall from height. They require “productive paranoia” worrying enough to plan until you’re confident the danger is mitigated.
  2. Hidden Risks – These are often missed without visual planning. Things like zone clashes, trade instability, or improper batch sizes can quietly build into major problems if left unseen.

Trade Instability and Daily Planning

Another key risk is trade instability partners not showing up or performing poorly. The solution is to identify these issues early through premobilization meetings, pull planning, mockups, and first-run studies ideally months before they hit the field.

Daily planning can also help, but only when combined with strategic horizons:

  • Project horizon (entire project view).
  • One-year horizon (weather, procurement, environmental factors).
  • Three-month horizon (team pull planning).
  • Six-week horizon (roadblock-free focus).
  • Three-week horizon (trade partner start planning).
  • One-week horizon (weekly work plan).
  • Day horizon (next-day plan).

Daily plans alone won’t save a project, they must connect to broader horizons.

Making Risk Management Serious

The risk and opportunity register should never be something that sits on a shelf. Review it weekly, hold each other accountable, and make it a visible, living part of your team culture. Accountability means helping each other meet expectations and keeping risks front and center.

Key Takeaway

The most dangerous risks on construction projects aren’t always obvious. Beyond catastrophic events, hidden risks like bottlenecks, trade instability, and planning gaps can quietly derail a project. By applying visual systems, strategic horizons, and consistent accountability through a living risk register, teams can see risks before they happen and keep projects on track.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

 

 

Posted in All

True Connection, Feat. Coralee Beatty

Read 4 min

Mental Health in Construction

In today’s blog, we dive into a conversation with Coralee Beatty about a topic that cannot be overlooked in construction mental health.

Coralee has decades of experience in the industry, from working as a building envelope technician to co-owning and leading businesses with her husband. After selling their business, she went on a journey of rediscovery and eventually became a business coach, consultant, and fractional COO. Her focus today is helping people and companies grow by developing strong cultures and training leaders at every level.

The Human Side of Construction

Coralee’s passion for the industry is clear, but so is her concern. She shared that her own son is currently working as an HVAC technician, and every day she reminds him to stay safe on the job. That tension between pride in the industry and worry for those who work in it fuels her mission.

She explained that construction has long been focused on projects and production, often overlooking the human connection that workers crave. For decades, it was enough to show up, do your work, and collect a paycheck. But times have changed.

“People need to feel like they’re part of something bigger than punching a clock.”

Leaders who don’t understand this end up leading with frustration, yelling, or indifference. This lack of connection contributes to a toxic cycle and the alarming suicide rates in construction prove the stakes are far too high.

Redefining Leadership

When asked how she defines leadership, Coralee’s answer was powerful:

Leadership is about creating other leaders not just followers.

True leadership means helping others make decisions, think strategically, and grow into their full potential. It’s not about control, but about equipping people with tools and confidence to succeed.

What the Industry Is Missing

So what’s the blind spot? Coralee believes it’s a failure to recognize that the needs of workers have evolved. Many leaders are so consumed by project demands that they forget the bigger picture: the people who make the work possible.

Simple acts of connection greeting team members, asking about their weekends, knowing their goals and aspirations go a long way. As Coralee puts it:

“If you’re more interested in helping your people be successful than you are in your own success, that’s when you’ll truly succeed.”

The ROI is undeniable. Companies that invest in people development often see up to four times the return through productivity, engagement, and retention.

Building the Future Together

The construction industry can’t afford to ignore mental health. If we want to attract the next generation, reduce turnover, and lower the heartbreaking suicide rates, we need to lead differently. That means:

  • Fostering human connection on jobsites and in offices.
  • Prioritizing people development, not just leadership titles.
  • Helping team members reach their personal and professional goals.

When we shift our mindset from chasing projects to building people, we elevate the entire industry.

Key Takeaway

The construction industry’s greatest opportunity isn’t just in projects it’s in people. By creating connection, developing leaders at every level, and prioritizing mental health, we build a safer, stronger, and more sustainable future.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

On we go

Posted in All

2 Tips for PMs

Read 4 min

Two Essential Tips for Project Managers

In construction management, two practices make the difference between an average project and an excellent one. These are not complicated techniques buried in manuals but simple truths that carry deep impact. The first is the importance of building loyal and experienced teams. The second is learning to be comfortable with discomfort and resisting the urge to perfect habits that no longer serve progress.

Let us begin with loyalty. Many project managers face the challenge of leading teams they did not hire or build themselves. This is not unusual in our industry, but it does make success harder. Teams often struggle when members are unmotivated, disengaged, or pulling in different directions. No matter how skilled each person may be, if they are not aligned with a shared purpose, progress is limited.

One way to overcome this is to invest in people long before you need them. Build relationships, nurture careers, and take time to train and support those around you. When you care about people and consistently go the extra mile for them, they remember. Later, when it is time to staff a project, those same people often choose to work with you. Having even one or two trusted right hand team members who share your vision and commitment can change everything.

At its core, successful projects are not led by random collections of individuals. They are led by connected groups that trust each other, share experience, and are loyal to a common mission. Curating even a small circle of loyal teammates gives project managers the foundation for delivering remarkable results.

The second key is learning how to avoid becoming trapped in ineffective habits. Many project managers become very skilled at using outdated methods and tools. The sense of accomplishment from creating polished reports, perfect spreadsheets, or detailed analyses can feel satisfying but ultimately be meaningless if the methods do not improve project outcomes. There is a risk of getting addicted to the dopamine hit of completing tasks that should not be done in the first place.

Growth often feels uncomfortable. Trying a new scheduling method, restructuring communication through huddles, or reorganizing workflow with Lean practices may feel messy at first. It disrupts routines and challenges existing comfort zones. Yet real improvement only comes from being willing to start again, make mistakes, and adapt.

This principle can be summed up simply: get good at not being good. Progress is not about perfecting the status quo. It is about learning, experimenting, and being willing to look unpolished while developing something better. Comfort and perfection can lock teams into patterns that stop innovation. Discomfort, on the other hand, creates space for growth.

For project managers, the lesson is clear. Build loyalty in your teams so you are not leading alone, and cultivate the courage to change even when it feels uncomfortable. Success lies in people who will stand with you and in systems that keep evolving.

Key Takeaway

Project managers succeed when they build loyal, connected teams and when they resist the trap of getting too comfortable with ineffective routines. Growth requires both people and progress.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our YouTube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

Posted in All

Respect in a New Light

Read 5 min

Respect in Construction: People, Resources, Customers, and Ourselves

Today I want to talk about respect in construction, but in a different way than I usually approach the topic. Respect is not just about courtesy or professionalism. It is about how we treat people, how we care for resources, how we handle our customers, and how we respect ourselves. These four areas combine to shape the culture, performance, and outcomes of any construction project.

Let me begin with a bit of an update. I am still working on the Elevating Construction Senior Superintendents book about the Last Planner System. The introduction, graphics, and cover are already done, and now we are writing the sections that describe the system itself. At the same time, LeanTakt continues to grow. We are weaving lessons from How Big Things Get Done and Built to Fail into our outlines, and it is exciting to see these ideas connect.

One thing that stood out to me recently came from a conversation about communication. My wife reminded me that words carry weight differently for men and women. Men often shrug off comments about appearance, but women may internalize them for years. Respect means being mindful, careful, and considerate, especially with the people closest to us. That same principle applies to teams in construction. Respect is not about avoiding conflict but about using words and actions to build others up rather than break them down.

Another reflection I have been working through relates to team size. I usually advocate for small teams of three to twelve people, ideally around four. But through our work at LeanTakt, I have seen how larger spans of responsibility can function effectively when the structure is right. We now train every Lean engineer to grow into leadership, and we rotate pod leaders who guide small groups within larger teams. This blend provides both the intimacy of small groups and the efficiency of larger structures. Respect here means adapting management approaches so that people are supported without burying them under layers of supervision.

Now let us explore respect in a broader sense. In Lean construction, respect starts with people. It means listening, training, supporting, and onboarding them properly. It means providing the logistics they need, from parking to water to safe facilities. It means creating safe, clean, and organized sites where they can work productively and go home unharmed. Respect includes connecting with workers often, holding huddles, making work fun, organizing barbecues, and building flowable schedules that prevent burnout. Even small touches like clean bathrooms and good lunch areas communicate respect. Most importantly, it means speaking up for workers when they cannot speak up for themselves.

Respect also extends to resources. When we prefabricate, we respect time and effort. When we minimize waste, we respect the environment and our budgets. When we order properly and avoid overburdening suppliers, we respect the supply chain. Caring for equipment, maintaining project sites, and treating surrounding areas with consideration are also acts of respect. These practices save time, reduce rework, and build trust.

Respecting customers takes the conversation further. In construction, everyone is a customer. Owners, designers, trade partners, neighbors, vendors, even pedestrians passing the site all count. Imagine how different a project culture would be if we treated every one of them as our most valued customer. That means asking how neighbors would feel about noise, how end users would experience the placement of fixtures, and how pedestrians would experience traffic control. Respect means protecting budgets and investor money, coordinating with facility managers, communicating clearly, and making the process easier for those who rely on us.

Finally, we must respect ourselves. That means getting the help we need, balancing workloads, and ensuring our teams have the tools and resources to succeed. It means following financial approvals, not forcing trades into impossible situations, and covering risks. It means asking for what we need, protecting our energy, and managing our workload sustainably. When we fail to respect ourselves, we eventually fail our clients and teams as well.

Respect in construction is not one-dimensional. It covers people, resources, customers, and ourselves. Neglecting any one of these areas leads to imbalance. You cannot truly care for the owner if you are burning yourself out. You cannot claim to respect your workers if you neglect resources or create chaotic schedules. Respect is a cycle, and when it is practiced fully, it lifts entire projects to a higher level.

I share this because these insights did not make it into the new book, but they are too important to overlook. Respect is not a side note in construction. It is the foundation of trust, performance, and long-term success.

Key Takeaway

Respect in construction extends beyond people. It includes resources, customers, and ourselves. When we integrate all four, we create projects that thrive and teams that succeed.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our YouTube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

Posted in All

Clarifications about Lean

Read 5 min

Today, I want to make some clarifications about Lean that I think you’ll find valuable.

I recently received some wonderful feedback from a listener who leads a construction team within a top architectural firm that builds high-end homes and residential projects. He shared how the blog has been a source of inspiration and asked for resources on lift drawings that field engineers should be doing. Over time, we’ve developed detailed checklists for lift drawings, so if you are reading this and need those, please reach out again. I would be happy to share them.

That feedback reminded me of something bigger. Recently someone asked if there are companies truly doing Lean in construction today. When I really thought about it, the answer is no, not in the pure sense. I don’t know of a company that matches what Toyota did in manufacturing or what Paul Akers built in his organization. I don’t even think my own company is fully there yet. We are still developing, learning, and striving.

So, what does it take to master Lean in construction?

First, we need to get rid of our egos. Most of the time we don’t know if we are talking to someone’s true self or their ego, and that can distort the conversation. Second, we must never stop learning. Too many Lean consultants get fixed in what they know, which is just another form of classical management disguised as Lean.

Third, we need to network with the whole. Lean will only take root if experts and practitioners come together to learn from one another. We must be willing to improve, fail, go against the grain, and constantly question what we know. That is how real progress happens.

A few examples stand out. I learn a lot from Paul Akers, from the book How Big Things Get Done, from Built to Fail, and from the Lean Builder community. These connections spread knowledge and build momentum. Fighting among practitioners wastes time.

At the same time, we need to acknowledge misconceptions. One common one is around takt planning. Some argue for a single takt time plan where everything fits into a rigid rhythm. But in construction, reality is different. Most projects involve multiple trains of trades working at different paces. A multi-train takt plan reflects the real production system and still delivers the benefits of rhythm, flow, and optimization.

Another misconception comes from manufacturing thinking. Some people argue the flow unit must always be the value receiving unit. In construction, it is the trades that flow. They are the flow unit. Without trades, nothing moves forward. A narrow view of flow units ignores the multidimensional nature of construction and the need for both resource efficiency and work efficiency.

These misconceptions are not harmless. They keep us stuck in old ways of thinking and prevent us from mapping the production system correctly. For example, advanced work packaging sounds promising, but when it is tied to CPM scheduling, it cancels out the benefits of flow. Just because an idea comes from a well-known author or a popular book does not make it flawless. We must keep testing and questioning everything.

For me personally, Kate challenges my thinking constantly. Every book, every idea, every framework, we dissect it. At times it feels overwhelming, but it keeps me from getting stuck. And that is the point: none of us have it all figured out. Lean is not finished. We are still in research and development, and the moment we stop learning, we lose momentum.

As I layer together lessons from flow units, the Toyota Way, the Lean Builder, and other frameworks, I see the Integrated Production Control System bringing together the Last Planner System, takt production, and control as the most complete model available today. It is not perfect yet, but it is closer to mapping the reality of construction than anything else I have seen.

Lean in construction is not complete, and no company has mastered it fully. But by staying humble, learning from each other, and refusing to get fixed in our thinking, we can keep moving closer to what Lean is meant to be.

Key Takeaway

Lean in construction is still in development, but by staying humble, learning from one another, and avoiding fixed mindsets, we can continue moving toward true Lean.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our YouTube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

Posted in All

Focus on Supply and Demand

Read 5 min

In this entry, I want to share a mix of reflections, milestones, and lessons that tie into both our industry and life. This blog might feel like it moves in a few directions, but each piece connects to how we grow as professionals and as human beings.

Let’s start with a milestone. We recently hit 50 percent women in our company. This is not something that happened by accident. We intentionally recruit women while hiring based on qualification, not gender. Equal opportunity is the goal. The reality is that the industry doesn’t naturally filter as many women into construction as it does men, so we must be intentional. For me, this milestone is more than numbers. It is about fairness, diversity, and breaking an old pattern in construction.

For years, I have admired companies like Hensel Phelps that have made incredible progress in diversity and created space for women to thrive. Seeing our own organization move in that direction makes me proud because it reflects a deeper belief. Equal is not fair, but fair is equal. Everyone deserves the same opportunities without discrimination.

This milestone reminded me of a Taylor Swift Netflix documentary called Miss Americana. It may sound surprising, but I encourage every male in our industry to watch it. The film opened my eyes to how laws and cultural systems still create barriers for women. It also showed me how important it is to speak up and use your voice. Taylor’s story of finally stepping into her political voice and opposing a candidate who supported policies harmful to women was powerful. It made me realize that standing up for equality is not optional if we want a fair society.

Yes, I am a Swifty, and I make no apologies for that. Beyond the music, the lessons about maturity, fairness, and using your voice are universal. Her story reinforced something I already believed: when we embrace diversity and equality, we become better leaders, friends, husbands, and humans.

This connects to a broader perspective I found while reading A New Earth by Eckhart Tolle. Tolle explains how ego has fueled centuries of domination, war, and control. While some ancient civilizations respected feminine energy, over time patriarchy took hold. That shift wasn’t because men were naturally meant to lead but because the ego found it easier to dominate through men. Women, being more in tune with their bodies and presence, resisted ego more naturally.

The result has been centuries of abuse, suppression, and inequality. Religion, politics, and culture often reinforced these systems. Yet when we strip away ego and fear, what remains is human connection. Without fear, we see people as they are: equals deserving respect and dignity.

This point struck me personally. I used to see the world through a narrow lens, shaped by politics and fear. I believed in male dominance, opposed immigration, and held negative views about the LGBTQ+ community. But life experiences shook me out of that spell. It feels like waking up, realizing how much fear controlled my perspective.

When you truly meet people, when you share a meal or a conversation, it is impossible to maintain those old biases. You cannot hate immigrants once you’ve shared a table with them. You cannot condemn gay people once you’ve heard their stories. You cannot think of women as lesser when you have daughters you love deeply.

This awakening has made me believe more than ever that leadership in construction and in life must be rooted in fairness and truth. Fear sells in politics and culture, but it cannot guide us if we want progress. We must shake off fear and ego and lead with presence.

Let me bring this back to construction. While reflecting on these themes, I have been reading Built to Fail. The book highlights critical points about bottlenecks, capacity, and flow. One principle stood out: in a high-performance production system, the bottleneck can be purposely placed as a control point to regulate flow. Instead of chaos, you achieve balance.

Construction too often falls into chaos with CPM schedules. CPM creates demand-driven documents that don’t reflect supply, leading to overburden, wasted effort, and low hit rates. Studies show that only 15 to 45 percent of tasks planned on CPM schedules actually happen. That is unacceptable. Imagine betting on a system with only a 20 percent chance of success, you wouldn’t do it. Yet CPM continues to dominate.

The better way is to focus on supply-driven systems like takt planning. When you level resources, control work in process, and reduce variability, the entire system flows. This is about respecting workers, avoiding overburden, and aligning demand with reality. It is about designing production systems that reflect what is possible, not just what someone in an office demands.

As I wrap up, I hope these reflections connect. Equality, diversity, fairness, and flow may seem like different topics, but they are deeply linked. Whether we are talking about the role of women in construction, shedding fear-driven mindsets, or improving production systems, the principle is the same: treat people with fairness, respect truth, and design for flow. That is how we build not just better projects, but a better industry and a better society.

Key Takeaway

True progress comes when we strip away fear and ego, embrace equality, and design systems that respect people and flow.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our YouTube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

 

On we go

Posted in All