Making Elevating Construction Surveyors, Part 1, Feat. Brandon Montero

Read 20 min

Five Things Every Construction Surveyor Should Master Before Picking Up the Equipment

There is a common misunderstanding about what the early stages of a surveying career are actually for. A Rodman or field technician looks like a manual labor position from the outside: hammering lath, loading the truck, holding the rod. But that framing misses the entire point. The early positions in a survey crew exist to build something far more valuable than muscle memory. They exist to develop the discipline of situational awareness, the habit of preparation, and the professional standard that follows a surveyor for the rest of their career.

Brandon Monteiro, a veteran surveyor and co author of the forthcoming book Elevating Construction Surveyors, joined Jason Schroeder to walk through the first five foundational concepts every surveyor needs to internalize. These are not technical skills. They are the professional habits that make technical skills effective.

Absorb the Environment Around You

Brandon tells the story of Joe, a chain man in Washington State who would go out to cut line for a topographic survey and every five minutes you would hear someone say “Joe, that way.” Joe was working hard. His head was down. He was producing effort. He was also going in the wrong direction constantly, because he had stopped looking at where the work was actually headed.

The Rodman role gives you something rare in a career: the freedom to absorb. You are not yet the party chief. You are not responsible for the data collector or the calculations. That means you have space that more senior people do not have. You can watch the crew lead and understand their thought process. You can ask questions. You can observe the sequence and the logic of what is happening around you.

The mistake is treating that freedom as permission to turn your brain off. The Rodman who uses that position to stay curious, to ask why things are happening in the order they are happening, and to build their picture of the whole task is investing in a career that compounds over time. The one who just works is leaving everything on the table.

Always absorb the environment around you. Take the opportunity to learn at every level of the work.

Preparing for Work Means You Know What the Work Is

Brandon’s second principle sounds simple until you trace its failure mode. Survey crews drive hours to remote sites, set up their equipment, and discover they are missing a car battery to power the GPS. Or aerial panel targets. Or enough of the right nails for the task at hand. Not because the crew was careless. Because they ran through a general checklist of preparedness rather than thinking through the specific task they were going to perform.

The discipline is connecting preparation to the actual work order. A general checklist covers what the crew normally carries. A task specific preparation reviews what this particular task requires, what the edge cases are, what could come up that would require something not on the standard list.

Brandon’s challenge is direct: ask for a copy of the work order. Even at the Rodman level, even in a role where the expectation is that you will be told what to do. The work order tells you what the task is, which materials will be needed, how many of each, and what conditions the crew will be working in. Having that information in your hands before you leave the office changes everything about how you prepare.

Preparing for work means you know what the work is. Not just what you normally do.

Refine Your Tool Belt Continuously

Brandon has been a surveyor since the late 1990s and says he is still refining his tool belt. The most recent update was about two months before this conversation. His principle is simple: a tool belt that serves yesterday’s tasks is not good enough for today’s. The goal is to carry what you need without being overburdened, to be prepared for the full range of what could come up on a given day without slowing yourself down with equipment you will not use.

The phrase “it’s in the truck” is one of the worst things a surveyor can hear from a Rodman. The truck might be parked across the street. It might be down a hill. It might not be able to come onto the site at all. Every trip back to the truck is a hit to production, and every hit to production could have been prevented by preparation.

The principle extends beyond the physical tool belt. It applies to the mental preparation of knowing the task well enough to anticipate what will be needed. A Rodman who has read the work order and envisioned the day knows what to pack. A Rodman who loaded the standard kit and stopped thinking there will be making trips to the truck.

Refine your tool organization constantly. Update it based on the specific demands of each task, not just what has always worked before.

Envision the Work Order Before You Leave the Office

Brandon’s crew kept a folder called the Hall of Shame. It held the worst work orders they had ever received: orders written on napkins, orders with grease stains, orders with no job name, no map, and almost no information about what the task actually required. The humor was dark but the principle underneath it was serious. A work order that does not allow you to envision the task is a work order that sets you up to fail.

The productive version of this principle is envisioning the work order before stepping foot on site. Read it thoroughly. Ask what the progression of steps will be. Think through what each person on the crew will be doing, not just yourself. Identify the potential obstacles. What if some of the targets fall on the road? Are you painting grass? Is there enough material for the edge cases? What questions could be answered here in the office that will otherwise require a phone call from the field?

The work that happens in the mind before the crew leaves the office is not extra. It is the preparation that makes the field work coherent. As Brandon puts it, they are really paying you for preparation and execution. Not for work and rework and return trips.

Accomplish the task in your mind before you step foot on site. Think through every step, every potential obstacle, and every question that can be answered now rather than in the field.

Learn to Read the Plans

The plan set is the official record. It supersedes the work order, the office calculations, the CAD drawings, the data collector line work, and almost anything else. That makes it the most important document on any project, and the one that most field personnel at the early career stage spend the least time with.

Brandon tells the story of sending an RFI because a CAD drawing and the plan set disagreed with each other. He was told the plan set was the official version. He went back to the plan set and found that the plan set was disagreeing with itself, architectural dimensions conflicting with structural. After some time, the final answer came back: the CAD file had actually been correct. The lesson is not that the plan set is unreliable. It is that professional surveyors do not take any single source of information on faith. They read thoroughly, compare disciplines, look for conflicts, and verify.

Brandon’s personal practice is to approach every set of plans the way Indiana Jones was warned to approach every person in The Last Crusade: do not trust anybody. That means doing a distance inquiry on every grid line and confirming it matches both the architectural and structural plan sets. It means sending RFIs when things do not reconcile. It means understanding which portions of the plans pertain to your work, including the portions that look like they belong to another discipline but could have direct bearing on what you are doing in the field.

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. These five habits apply far beyond surveying. The discipline of absorbing the environment, preparing specifically for the task, refining your tools continuously, envisioning the process before performing it, and reading the source documents thoroughly: these are the habits of the best professionals in any field role in construction.

The Challenge for Every Surveyor at Every Level

These five habits are not beginner concepts that advanced surveyors have already handled and moved past. Brandon has been in the field for decades and is still refining his tool belt, still reading plans as if nothing can be trusted, still envisioning work orders before leaving the office. The difference between a good surveyor and a great one often comes down to how rigorously they apply the fundamentals at every stage of their career.

As one of the principles from this conversation states, the work is not done when the task is complete. The work is done when the math checks out. That standard applies to preparation just as much as it applies to execution. Prepare until the plan is sound. Perform until the result is verified. Then call it done.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why should a Rodman care about envisioning the full work order if the party chief is responsible for the task?

Because ownership of understanding is not the same as ownership of authority. A Rodman who understands the task is prepared to contribute, to catch problems early, and to develop faster than one who waits to be told what to do. The best professionals take responsibility for understanding even when the formal accountability belongs to someone else.

How often should a surveyor update their tool belt or field kit?

Continuously. Brandon updates his based on task type and has been doing so for decades. The goal is matching your kit to the specific demands of the upcoming work, not carrying everything you own and not arriving with just the standard setup. Review your kit against the work order before every job.

What is the fastest way to get better at reading plans if you have limited experience?

Start comparing disciplines. Look at what the architectural plans say about a given element and then find the same element in the structural plans. Note where they agree and where they differ. Ask questions when things do not reconcile. The skill of reading plans is built through active comparison, not passive review.

What should a field professional do when the work order is unclear or incomplete?

Ask for clarification before leaving the office, not from the field by phone. An unclear work order is a preview of an unclear execution. The questions that can be answered at the office should be answered now. The questions that will require a return trip if unanswered should surface at the planning stage.

Do these five principles apply to roles other than surveying?

Yes, which is one of the most important things about them. Field engineers, foremen, assistant superintendents, and project engineers face the same fundamental choices: absorb or tune out, prepare specifically or generically, read the source documents or assume. The principles are universal. The application is specific to each trade.

 

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

A New Free Resource for Your Takt Journey!!!

Read 17 min

Your Complete Takt Planning Journey Is Now Mapped: Here Is How to Use It

There is a problem that Jason Schroeder hears constantly from project teams who want to implement Takt planning but do not know where to start. They have heard the podcast episodes. Some have read the book. They understand conceptually that Takt planning produces better outcomes. But when they sit down to actually begin, the path forward is not clear. What do they do first? What comes after that? Where do they go when they get stuck?

That question is what drove Elevate Construction to build something Jason describes as a direct answer to it: a complete, step by step Takt planning journey mapped on a Miro board, free and openly accessible to any individual, team, or organization in the industry.

What the Miro Board Actually Is

Miro is a visual collaboration platform that allows teams to build interactive boards with sticky notes, graphics, links, and organized content flows. Elevate Construction used it to build what is essentially a visual curriculum for a Takt planning implementation, designed so that anyone who opens it can orient themselves immediately and know exactly where to begin.

The board opens with a clear starting point: this is how you use the board, these are the resources available to you, and this is who you can contact if you need support. From there, it moves through a sequenced path: step one leads to step two leads to step three, and so on. At each step, the board links directly to the resources that support that stage of the journey, including podcast episodes, blog posts, books, Amazon orders, and landing pages for Elevate Construction programs.

The goal is that no one who opens the board should have to figure out where to go next. The path is built. The resources are linked. The journey is already mapped.

Why This Matters for the Industry

The McCarthy project story that surfaces in this episode is worth sitting with for a moment. A senior general superintendent on a $480 million project read Elevating Construction Takt Planning, implemented it on his own, and immediately shaved three months off the project schedule. Then the team optimized their concrete workflow. Then they built predictability around the high risk commissioning phase. The system kept delivering.

That superintendent had the book, the courage to experiment, and the experience to adapt. He made it work. But as Jason acknowledges directly, not everyone has that combination. Not every team has a seasoned leader willing to figure it out from first principles. Not every company can absorb the trial and error that comes with learning a new planning system on a live project.

The Miro board exists to close that gap. It is the guided path that the book did not include, the curriculum that connects the concepts to the practice, and the resource hub that keeps every team from having to rediscover what others have already figured out.

This is how an industry improves at scale. Not by requiring every team to reinvent the approach independently, but by making the best available path accessible to everyone who wants to take it.

The Philosophy Behind the Resource

Jason describes the creation of this board as inspired. That word choice matters. The Miro board is not a product launch or a marketing asset. It is a genuine attempt to democratize access to Takt planning knowledge. Anyone in the industry, anywhere, can open the board and begin their journey. There is no registration required. No fee. No prerequisite training.

This reflects a principle Jason returns to repeatedly in his work: the industry improves when knowledge flows freely. Keeping frameworks proprietary or locked behind expensive consulting engagements benefits a few. Publishing them openly and making them navigable benefits everyone. Trade partners improve. General contractors improve. Owners benefit from better run projects. Workers go home having actually built something instead of having survived something.

The Miro board is an expression of that philosophy in practical form.

What Is in the Board Right Now

In its current form, the board covers the foundational path for a Takt planning implementation. It is organized to serve three types of users: an individual practitioner learning on their own, a project team beginning their implementation journey, and a company trying to establish Takt planning as an organizational standard.

For each stage of the journey, the board points to the most relevant resources currently available. Some of those resources are complete. Others are marked with notes indicating that a blog post or a video is in development to fill that section. Jason and his team are actively building out those resources as the content library grows.

The board is also designed to evolve. As new podcasts, blog posts, case studies, and training materials are produced, they will be linked into the relevant sections of the journey. The intent is that within a few months of its release, the board will represent the most complete public resource available anywhere for learning and implementing Takt planning in construction.

How to Start

The most important step is simply opening the board. The link is in the show notes for this episode. If you cannot find it there, email Elevate Construction directly and they will get it to you. Once you are in the board, start at the designated starting point and follow the path.

Before you do anything else, here are the questions worth answering about where you currently are:

  • Are you an individual trying to understand Takt planning well enough to bring it to your team? 
  • • Are you a team about to begin implementation on a project? 
  • • Are you a company trying to establish a consistent methodology across multiple projects?

The board is designed to serve all three, but knowing which path applies to you will help you navigate to the right starting sections and the most relevant resources for your current stage.

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. The Miro board is one part of a broader ecosystem of support, from coaching to boot camps to the books and planning tools that underpin the Takt system.

The Bigger Picture

Takt planning works. The evidence is not theoretical. It is in the three months shaved from a $480 million project. It is in the trade partner who emailed a GC saying he had never been on a project that flowed the way theirs did. It is in the workers who go home on time because the plan was made ready and the work had room to flow.

The industry has enough proof. What it has lacked is a clear path for teams who want to start but do not know how. The Miro board closes that gap. It is a complete roadmap, built by people who have implemented the system on real projects, organized so that anyone who opens it can find their footing and begin.

The journey is mapped. All you have to do is start.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Takt planning and why does it work better than CPM scheduling?

Takt planning is a production based approach to construction scheduling that organizes work into defined zones with consistent cycle times, creating predictable flow across a project. Unlike CPM, which coordinates activities without managing the physical conditions that allow those activities to proceed, Takt planning creates even workflow that reduces interference between trades, cuts waiting time, and makes the schedule something the crew can actually feel and follow.

Do I need to read the book before using the Miro board?

The book Elevating Construction Takt Planning provides the conceptual foundation that makes the board more useful. The board links to the book and other resources at the points where they are most relevant, so you do not need to have read it first. But reading it will give you a significantly better understanding of why each step on the board is sequenced the way it is.

Can the Miro board be used by a team that has never done any lean planning?

Yes. The board is designed to bring a team from no prior lean or Takt experience through the foundational concepts and into the practical implementation steps. The starting point on the board is oriented toward orientation and foundation, not assumption of prior knowledge.

How is the Miro board different from just reading the podcast episodes or blogs on Takt planning?

The podcast and blog content covers individual topics and concepts. The Miro board organizes that content into a sequenced path with a clear beginning, middle, and progression. It is the curriculum that the individual pieces of content support. Instead of having to figure out which episodes apply to which stage of your journey, the board does that work for you.

What if my team gets stuck during implementation and the board does not address the specific problem?

That is exactly the situation where reaching out to Elevate Construction directly makes sense. The board is designed to get teams as far as possible independently, but coaching support is available for teams who need more than a self guided resource. The contact information for that support is on the board itself.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

You have a Problem!

Read 17 min

You Have a Problem: A Direct Message to the Construction Industry

There is a story about Febreze that Jason Schroeder tells often because it is an almost perfect mirror of what is happening in construction right now. When Procter and Gamble first launched Febreze, the product did something remarkable: it neutralized odors. Completely. Scientifically. The problem was that the people who needed it most could not smell what the product was eliminating. The person whose house smelled like cat urine had long since stopped noticing it. The smoker did not know they smelled like smoke. The product did not sell until they added artificial scents to it, because people needed to smell something improving before they could recognize that something had been wrong.

The construction industry right now does not know it stinks. That is the problem. Projects that would be considered deeply unacceptable by any reasonable standard are being called successful. Superintendents with thirty five years of experience are saying they have nothing to learn because everything has “always been fine.” General contractors are listing every external factor they can find as the reason their projects are suffering, while the actual reasons stand in plain sight on the job site every day.

This is not a small issue. It is a systemic one. And it is not going to get better until more people in the industry are willing to say it out loud.

The Victim Mentality Has to Stop

COVID. Supply chain disruptions. Workforce shortages. These are real factors. They are also, in too many cases, being used as cover for execution problems that existed long before any of them arrived. Jason is direct about this: if you are a general contractor, the project site is your world. You are the god of that project with a lowercase g. Everything that goes wrong there belongs to you. Not to the trade partners. Not to the owner. Not to material delays. To you.

That does not mean external factors do not exist. It means that the leader’s job is to anticipate, plan around, absorb, and adapt. When a GC’s first response to a struggling project is to list everything that happened to them, the crew, the trade partners, and the workers are the ones who absorb the consequences of that abdication. And the cost is not just schedule or budget. It is people. It is workers whose working conditions are unsafe or disrespectful. It is trade partners being pushed through the knothole on timelines they never agreed to. It is talented professionals leaving the industry entirely because they cannot stomach one more project that treats people as expendable inputs.

The victim mentality in construction is not just bad leadership. It is a failure of care for the people who show up to build every day.

What Bare Minimum Actually Means

Here is where Jason refuses to soften the message. The standards he is describing as bare minimums are not aspirational goals for exceptional companies. They are the floor. The starting point. The things that should be happening on every project before anyone starts talking about excellence.

A clean project site is construction 101. Not something to be proud of. Not a differentiator. The baseline. Workers deserve clean restrooms. They deserve a site where they can move safely without navigating piles of material scattered across every work zone. They deserve a job that looks like it is being run by professionals, because it is.

An organized logistics plan where deliveries arrive on time and have a designated place to land is construction 101. A procurement log that tracks what has been ordered, what has been received, and what needs to arrive and when: construction 101. Not advanced scheduling. Not lean innovation. The starting point for running a project.

A risk and opportunity register that tracks what could go wrong and what contingency covers it, alongside what could go right and what fee opportunity it opens: construction 101. A superintendent or project manager who does not have one is not running a project. They are reacting to one.

Flow in the schedule: this is where Jason’s frustration reaches its peak. The fact that Takt planning has to be sold, explained, defended, and argued for at this point in the industry’s development is, in his words, madness. CPM schedules that nobody reads, nobody understands, and nobody uses to make decisions are not schedules. They are documentation. Flow is how work actually gets done. Even workflow across a project, where every trade has what they need when they need it and the work moves predictably through zones: this is construction 101. It should not require a persuasion campaign.

The Basket Principle

There is something important underneath Jason’s passion here, and it matters for anyone receiving this message directly. Criticizing behavior is not criticizing identity.

When Jason talks to his kids, he holds up two baskets. One basket holds everything he believes about who they are: their worth, their potential, their character, his love for them. That basket is always full and never in question. The other basket holds what they did in a specific situation. The thing in the second basket can be wrong, needs to be addressed, and can be corrected. What is in the first basket is not affected.

The same principle applies to every superintendent and project manager who receives this message. If you have been running projects with dirty sites, reactive planning, and a victim mindset, that is in the second basket. It is a set of behaviors and habits that can be changed. It is not a verdict on who you are. The people Jason is most passionate about reaching are not the ones who cannot improve. They are the ones who do not yet know they need to.

What Finishing a Job Actually Means

When a GC says they finished a project, the real question is: finished at whose expense?

If the trade partners lost money, if workers were pushed through unsafe conditions, if the families of the people on that site absorbed the human cost of a project that ran people into the ground, if the owner got a building but not the relationship they deserved: then the project did not finish well. It finished on the backs of people who had no choice. And calling that a success is wrong.

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. The companies getting this right are not doing anything exotic. They are executing the fundamentals at a high level, treating people with respect, and refusing to accept the victim narrative when their projects get hard.

The Challenge for the Industry

Stop saying you do not have a problem. That is the starting point. Not a training program, not a new system, not a consultant. Just the willingness to walk your job site the way a visitor would see it, not the way someone who works there every day has stopped noticing it.

Walk the restrooms. Walk the material staging areas. Walk the areas where trade partners are working and ask yourself honestly: is this a site I would be proud to have anyone see? Is this a site that tells the workers on it that they are respected?

As the principle goes: the standard you walk past is the standard you accept. Every superintendent who ignores a dirty restroom has accepted that standard. Every project manager who looks at a disorganized logistics plan and says “we’ll fix it later” has accepted that standard. The industry will improve when more leaders refuse to walk past the things that need to change.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jason saying all GCs are the problem, or specific ones?

Specific patterns, not every company or person. Jason works with clients who are heading in a better direction every day. The message is aimed at the portion of the industry that is actively resisting improvement while blaming external factors for their results.

What is the first step for a superintendent who recognizes these problems on their own project?

Start with the site walk. Walk the project as if you are seeing it for the first time and grade it honestly. Clean or not clean. Organized or not organized. Then identify the two or three things that would most visibly signal a shift in standard, and make those happen this week.

How do you implement Takt planning on a project that has already started without it?

Begin with zone identification and a rough Takt cycle time based on your remaining scope. Even a simplified version of flow based scheduling will outperform a CPM that nobody reads. The goal in the short term is to introduce even workflow thinking into the daily conversation on the site.

What should trade partners do when a GC is running a project the wrong way?

Document everything. Protect your team. Communicate clearly in writing when conditions are affecting your ability to perform. And build relationships with GCs who do run projects the right way, because they exist and they are the future of the industry.

How does respect for workers connect to project performance?

Directly. Workers who feel respected show up on time, flag problems early, take ownership of quality, and stay on the project. Workers who feel disposable do the opposite. The superintendent who maintains a clean site, provides real facilities, and communicates with dignity is creating the conditions for a project that performs.

 

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

Being a Life Diabetic

Read 17 min

Are You a Life Diabetic? Why Caring About Everything Means Delivering Nothing

There is a certain kind of person who is always busy, always trying, always showing up for something. They care deeply about their family, their work, their church, their neighbors, their friends, their extended commitments. If you ask them, they will tell you they are doing their best. And they genuinely mean it. What they cannot understand is why the people around them still feel unsupported.

Jason Schroeder was coaching a close friend through exactly this situation when an analogy came to him that reframed the whole conversation. The friend was overwhelmed. Too much was happening. Important things were slipping. And yet the care was undeniably there. Jason kept saying “you just have to care more,” and it was not landing. Then the analogy arrived.

The Biology of an Overcommitted Life

Type 1 diabetes is characterized by insulin deficiency. A person with this condition has glucose in their bloodstream, sometimes dangerously high levels of it, but the body cannot transfer that glucose into the cells where it is actually needed. The insulin that acts as the carrier, the mechanism that opens the cell wall and allows that energy to flow in, is not there in sufficient quantity. The sugar sits in the blood, undelivered, causing damage not because it is bad but because it cannot reach where it needs to go.

Jason saw his friend in that image. The care was real. The commitment was real. The desire to show up for everyone was genuine. But the time and the capacity to transfer that care into actual presence, actual delivery, actual follow through: that was depleted. And depleted capacity is the insulin deficiency of an overcommitted life.

If care is blood sugar and time is insulin, then a person who has said yes to too many things is living with chronically high blood sugar and chronically low insulin. The care is circulating but never landing. The people who need it are waiting for something that is technically available but structurally unreachable.

When Everything Is Important, Nothing Is Important

There is a version of this that shows up in construction every day. A superintendent who has fifteen things flagged as top priority. A project manager who has said yes to every meeting request, every committee, every commitment that came across their desk. A field engineer who is being pulled in eight directions before eight in the morning.

The math is brutal. If you have committed to ten things but only have the time and capacity to do four of them properly, you will not do four of them well and skip the other six. You will attempt all ten and do none of them at the level they deserve. The person who needed 100% of your attention on a critical matter received 40%. The project that needed your full presence got a fraction of your focus. The family that needed you home received a distracted version of a tired person who technically showed up.

Jason puts it directly: would you rather be 100% present for four things or 40% present for ten? The answer feels obvious when it is stated that way. The reason most people do not live that way is that saying no requires a clarity about priorities that is genuinely hard to develop, and a discipline about protecting capacity that the culture of construction rarely rewards.

The Damage of Too Much Blood Sugar

In a diabetic body, chronically high blood sugar causes real damage: cardiovascular disease, nerve damage, cognitive impairment, organ complications. It is not the glucose itself that is the problem. It is the imbalance between what is circulating and what can actually be processed.

The same principle holds in an overcommitted life. Too many commitments, too much care spread across too many people and priorities, damages the person carrying it and fails the people depending on them. The superintendent who is running on empty, trying to cover too many fronts, makes worse decisions. The leader who never stops to breathe cannot be present with their crew. The person who said yes to everything at work, at church, at the neighborhood association, and in their extended family is delivering 40% to all of them while telling themselves they are doing their best.

They are doing their best. That is the painful part. The problem is not character. The problem is an imbalance between care and capacity. The insulin is low and the blood sugar is high, and that is a metabolic crisis whether it happens in a body or in a life.

The Tools That Restore Balance

Jason teaches personal organization and time management as leadership skills precisely because of this dynamic. The tools are not just productivity tricks. They are insulin regulation mechanisms.

Here is what that looks like in practice:

  • A weekly plan that identifies the four to six things that actually matter this week, and protects time for them before anything else gets scheduled
  • Buffers built into the schedule that absorb the unexpected without collapsing the plan for the week
  • A clear set of personal priorities that makes it possible to say no without guilt, because the reason for the no is already defined
  • The discipline to stop adding commitments when capacity is already full, treating a full schedule as a fact rather than a negotiating position

The person who has these tools can match their care level to their capacity. They are not caring less. They are caring more effectively. They are making sure that the glucose actually gets into the cells, that the people who need them actually receive what they are giving.

What This Looks Like on a Project

On a job site, life diabetic behavior shows up as a leader who is technically present but effectively absent. They walk the site without seeing it. They are in meetings without engaging in them. They are available but never quite there. The crew learns quickly that asking this person for a decision is not reliable. The schedule suffers because the attention it needs is spread across too many competing demands.

The remedy is not harder work. It is better prioritization. A superintendent who protects their focus on the three or four things that will determine the project’s success this week, and delegates or declines the rest, will outperform a superintendent who tries to carry everything. The capacity that is protected goes to the things that matter most. And the people who depend on that leadership receive something real rather than a depleted gesture.

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. Part of what that development looks like is teaching leaders how to manage their own capacity as carefully as they manage the schedule.

The Challenge This Week

Count your current commitments. Not just at work. All of them. Then ask honestly: do I have the time and capacity to deliver on all of these at the level each of them deserves?

If the answer is no, you are running with high blood sugar and low insulin. You are not failing because you do not care. You are failing because the care cannot reach the people who need it. The fix is not to care less. It is to be honest about how many things you can actually carry, and to make deliberate choices about which ones those will be.

As Warren Buffett has said, “The difference between successful people and really successful people is that really successful people say no to almost everything.” Protecting your capacity is not selfishness. It is the only way to actually deliver on the things you care about most.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you decide which commitments to keep and which to let go?

Start with your clearest priorities: immediate family, your most critical work responsibilities, and your own health. Everything else gets evaluated against those. If a commitment cannot be honored at full capacity right now, an honest conversation is better than a partial delivery.

What if I feel guilty saying no to people who need me?

Saying no to a commitment you cannot honor is not abandoning people. Saying yes and then delivering 40% is. The person who receives your full attention on fewer things is better served than the person who gets a distracted fragment of your overextended self.

How does this apply to a construction project specifically?

Every superintendent and project manager has a limited number of things they can genuinely focus on at any given time. When that list grows beyond their capacity, everything on the list suffers. Identifying the three to five things that will determine the project’s trajectory this week and protecting time for those is how high performing leaders operate.

What does a good personal organization system actually include?

A weekly planning session that reviews priorities before the week begins, a daily schedule with buffers built in, a clear short list of the week’s non negotiables, and a practice of reviewing what did not get done and deciding consciously whether it still belongs on the list.

Can someone recover from a life diabetic pattern without burning bridges?

Yes, but it takes honest communication. Most people respond well when someone says “I have overcommitted myself and I cannot deliver what I promised at the level you deserve.” That conversation is harder than the one where you silently drop the ball. It is also the one that preserves trust.

 

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

Are All of Your Core Values Operationalized?

Read 21 min

Are All of Your Core Values Operationalized? The Question That Changes How You Lead

Most companies have core values. They are printed on the lobby wall, listed in the employee handbook, and recited at company events. A few companies actually live by them. The difference between those two groups is not the quality of the values on the wall. It is whether those values have made their way off the wall and into the daily decisions, the systems, the hiring, the firing, the processes, and the culture that actually governs how the organization operates.

That is what operationalization means. Not posting the values. Not referencing them in quarterly all-hands meetings. Embedding them into every system and process in the organization so that the values are not a statement about what the company believes but an accurate description of how the company behaves when nobody is watching, under pressure, and in the decisions that cost something.

What a Core Value Actually Is

Before getting to operationalization, it is worth being precise about the definition. A core value is not an aspiration. It is not something the company wants to be true or is working toward. A core value is a value that already exists in the organization that already has sustaining energy, that is already present in the behavior of the people who belong and that is non-negotiable.

Non-negotiable means exactly that. You can hire according to it. You can discipline according to it. You can terminate according to it. If a behavior violates a core value, that violation is a serious matter, not a coaching conversation. If a hiring candidate clearly does not embody a core value, that is a disqualifier, not a concern to be managed after onboarding. The core values define who belongs in the organization and who does not, not based on performance metrics, not based on title, but based on whether the person is genuinely aligned with the values that define the culture.

The five core values at Elevate Construction are: Transparency, Respect for People, Do the Right Thing, Drive Real Results, and Real Team Enjoyment. Each one of those is something that already governs how the company operates, not something the company is working toward. When someone departs, it is because they were not driving real results or were not operating with transparency. When someone thrives, it is because they naturally embody all five. The alignment is self-reinforcing because the values are real, not aspirational.

Core Values Must Come Off the Wall

The insight that shapes how great organizations handle core values is simple and demanding: the values have to come off the wall and into people’s hearts. That phrase captures the entire challenge. A values statement that lives only on the wall is a marketing artifact. A value that lives in how people make decisions, how they treat each other, and what they celebrate and hold accountable is a culture.

The mechanics that move values off the wall are specific and intentional. Core value awards that recognize people who embody specific values in specific situations make the values concrete and visible. Regular integration of the values into team meetings, into the language of leadership, and into the feedback that people give and receive keeps them present rather than ceremonial. Hoshin Kanri, the strategic alignment process that connects organizational clarity to operational goals ensures that the direction the company is moving is grounded in the values rather than running parallel to them. When those mechanics are running consistently, the values stop being something people reference and start being something people live.

At Elevate Construction, the core values are not a separate initiative that competes with operational priorities. They are the foundation on which every operational priority sits. Every decision about who to hire, who to promote, who to part ways with, which clients to serve, which processes to build, all of it flows through the filter of the five values. That integration is not effortless. It requires ongoing reinforcement from leadership, ongoing commitment from the team, and ongoing willingness to make hard decisions in alignment with the values rather than around them. But it is achievable, and when it is achieved, the culture becomes self-sustaining.

The Operationalization Question

Here is the question worth sitting with: are your systems, your processes, your standard work, your standing tactical orders, and your strategies representing your core values? Not in theory, in practice, concretely, at the level of each individual system and process.

Take a core value and run it through every operational system the organization uses. Is the system transparent? Does the process respect people? Does the standard work drive real results? Does the standing tactical order reflect doing the right thing, or does it create friction that works against it? This is not a philosophical exercise. It is an operational audit. And the answers will reveal gaps between what the organization says it values and what the organization’s systems are actually designed to produce.

The transparency test is a useful one to run first, because transparency is both a value and a system condition. The First Planner System, is it transparent? The Takt Production System, is it transparent? The Last Planner System, is it transparent? The financial reporting, the PTO tracking, the project data, is it all accessible to the people who need it? When the answer is yes, transparency is not just a stated value. It is a designed condition of the information environment. When the answer is no, when certain data is held by certain people for certain reasons that have nothing to do with genuine confidentiality, the system is in conflict with the stated value, and the value is losing.

The same test applies to every core value. A company that says it respects people but runs a payment process that keeps trade partners waiting nine months for payment is not operationalizing respect for people. A company that says it drives real results but tolerates meetings that produce no decisions and no action items is not operationalizing results orientation. A company that says it values team enjoyment but normalizes chronic overwork, toxic conflict, and leadership by fear is not operationalizing enjoyment. The gap between the stated value and the operationalized reality is where cultures silently erode.

Warning Signs That Core Values Are Not Operationalized

Before the gap between stated values and actual systems compounds into a culture problem, look for these signals:

  • Core value language appears in company communications but not in hiring criteria, performance reviews, or disciplinary conversations.
  • People in the organization can recite the values but cannot describe a specific system or process that embodies each one.
  • Leadership makes decisions that visibly conflict with a core value without acknowledging the conflict or explaining the reasoning.
  • Core value awards recognize people who are liked by leadership rather than people who exemplified a specific value in a specific situation.
  • Aspirational values are being presented as current core values creating a gap between what the organization claims to be and what it actually is.

Any one of those signals means the values are still on the wall rather than in the operation. The fix is the operationalization audit going core value by core value through every system and asking whether the system embodies, reinforces, or undermines the value it is supposed to represent.

The Distinction Between Core Values and Aspirational Values

One more distinction worth making clearly: there is a meaningful difference between a core value and an aspirational value, and conflating them is one of the ways cultures lose integrity.

A core value already exists with sustaining energy. It is present now. It governs behavior now. It is the basis for current hiring and firing decisions. An aspirational value is something the organization genuinely wants to become, a quality or behavior it is working toward but cannot yet honestly claim as a description of current reality.

Both have value. Aspirational values give the organization a direction to grow toward and can eventually become core values through sustained investment and culture-building. But treating an aspirational value as a current core value posting it on the wall alongside the values that are genuinely non-negotiable misleads new hires about what they are joining, misleads the organization about where it actually is, and dilutes the meaning of the values that are real.

Being honest about which values are core and which are aspirational is itself an act of integrity that reflects the core value of transparency. The organization that can say “we aspire to this, and here is the work we are doing to make it real” is more trustworthy than the organization that claims every value on the wall is equally embedded in the culture.

Build the Culture Through the Systems

The work of operationalizing core values is never finished, because organizations change, systems evolve, and new situations create new opportunities to test whether the values are real. The leaders who take this work seriously who regularly audit their systems for value alignment, who make hard decisions in the direction of the values when it costs something, who recognize and celebrate value embodiment specifically and concretely are the ones who build cultures that sustain.

We are building people who build things. Building those people requires a culture that is honest about what it values, builds its systems to reflect those values, and holds the standard consistently enough that the values become something people carry internally rather than something they reference on the wall. If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow, and build the culture infrastructure that makes core values operational rather than decorative.

A Challenge for Builders

Take one of your company’s core values this week and run it through every major system your organization uses. Is the hiring process designed to identify alignment with that value? Is the performance review process designed to evaluate it? Is the financial reporting system designed to reinforce it? Is the weekly team meeting structured to bring it to life? If the answer to any of those is no, you have identified an operationalization gap. Name it. Assign it. Build the system change that closes it. That is the work of culture-building at the systems level, and it is the most durable form of leadership investment available.

As Jason says, “Respect for people is not soft, it’s a production strategy.”

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a core value and an aspirational value?

A core value already exists in the organization with sustaining energy, it governs current behavior, current hiring, and current discipline. An aspirational value is something the organization genuinely wants to become but cannot yet honestly claim as a description of current reality. Both have a place, but presenting aspirational values as current core values creates a credibility gap that erodes trust.

What does it mean to “operationalize” a core value?

It means embedding the value into the systems, processes, standard work, and decisions that govern daily operations, so that the value is not just a statement about what the organization believes but an accurate description of how it actually behaves. The test is whether each major system embodies, reinforces, or undermines the value it is supposed to represent.

How do core values come off the wall and into the culture?

Through specific, sustained mechanics: core value awards that recognize specific behaviors in specific situations, integration of the values into team meetings and feedback processes, strategic alignment that connects organizational direction to the values, and leadership that consistently makes hard decisions in alignment with the values rather than around them.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

Why We Focus on Entry-Level Talent

Read 19 min

Why I’m Mostly Looking for Entry-Level Positions: Building People the Right Way From the Start

Here is something that catches people off guard when they hear it from someone who has trained at the highest levels of construction leadership, who has worked with major national general contractors, and who runs a company doing significant consulting work across the industry: the positions I am most interested in hiring are entry-level ones.

Not because the work is simple. Not because the expectations are low. Because entry-level is where building people right is actually possible where the mind is still open, the habits are not yet calcified, and the culture can be shaped from the foundation rather than rebuilt over the rubble of someone else’s training. The opportunity in an entry-level hire is not that they know nothing. It is that they know the right things without having been taught the wrong ones first.

The PM Who Started Over

There is a story worth telling here because it captures exactly what this mindset looks like in practice. A PM, a seasoned professional who had been a significant presence at a major national general contractor left that company and eventually came back to another large national GC. And when he came back, he did not insist on a senior role. He went back to PE. Project engineer. He started over, went through the career steps properly, learned the systems from the ground up, and proved himself again through the actual work of the role rather than through the credentials he had accumulated.

He went on to become president of a major national general contractor. Not in spite of being willing to start at PE level again, but at least partly because of it. He understood something that most experienced professionals resist: knowing the systems from the inside, having built the habits and the judgment at every level, produces a kind of leadership that credential-based advancement cannot replicate.

There is no sympathy for the version of professional pride that says “I’ve done my time, I’m above that.” The people who refuse entry-level positions because they feel beneath them are refusing the thing that would make them excellent. The willingness to start where you need to start regardless of past experience, regardless of title history is a signal of exactly the character that produces great leaders.

Why Entry-Level Hires at LeanTakt Work So Well

The team at LeanTakt has been built substantially on entry-level hires young graduates from strong programs, often in their early to mid-twenties. Many of them have come from Tec de Monterrey, bringing educational rigor, strong work ethic, and a cultural orientation toward hard work and collective excellence that has made them some of the best people I have ever worked with across an entire career.

The investment in these individuals is significant. They go to Japan with Paul Akers. They learn Lean fundamentals from the ground up. They are trained in field engineering, project engineering, superintendent fundamentals, project management, commissioning, logistics, the full production system and they are taught the right way from the beginning. They develop alongside the culture rather than in opposition to it.

The result is a team that will never be comfortable in a toxic environment because they have never learned to accept one as normal. They will always expect to be treated with respect because they have been treated with respect from the beginning. They will always pursue education as a priority because that is what was modeled for them when they were being shaped. In a sense, these hires have been ruined for bad construction. They will never be satisfied with less than what they have been taught to expect and deliver.

The Real Reason: No Deprogramming Required

Here is the honest truth behind the preference for entry-level hires. When you bring on an experienced professional who has spent years in a dysfunctional environment not through any fault of their own, but because that is where their career developed, a significant portion of the onboarding investment goes into deprogramming rather than programming. You are not just teaching the Lean system. You are teaching against the habits, assumptions, and cultural norms that previous experience installed.

That deprogramming is real work, and it is not always successful. Some patterns are too embedded. Some habits fight the new approach at every step. Some cultural assumptions are so deep that they surface as resistance even when the person genuinely wants to change. None of that reflects badly on the individual. It reflects the power of what was trained into them over years of repetition in environments that rewarded the wrong things.

Entry-level hires do not need to be deprogrammed. They need to be programmed, once, correctly, from the beginning. The same total investment of time and intention produces dramatically different outcomes because it is building on a clean foundation rather than rebuilding over a cracked one.

The School System Problem

This conversation cannot be complete without naming something uncomfortable directly. Most of what happens in career development especially in the United States is deprogramming people from what they were taught in school. Not all of it. But enough of it that it is worth naming honestly.

Sit down and be quiet. Wait for the teacher to tell you what to think. Conform to the social group even when the group is toxic. Do not ask why. Do not experiment. Do not lead without permission. These are not the explicit lessons of any curriculum, but they are the implicit lessons that years of school-based conditioning produce in most students. And they are the exact opposite of what a great Lean construction environment requires.

Great Lean environments need people who speak up when they see waste or risk. Who think independently and bring creative solutions. Who participate in the production system because they understand it and believe in it, not because they were told to. Who hold the standard even when nobody is watching. Who treat learning as a lifelong responsibility rather than a phase of life that ended at graduation.

Getting someone before these habits have formed or as soon as possible after graduation, when the programming is newest and most malleable is a genuine advantage. The mind at twenty-two is more open to rewiring than the mind at forty-two, not because of intelligence or capability, but because of accumulated repetition. Fewer years of the wrong thing means less to undo.

Warning Signs That a Candidate Is Not Actually Entry-Level in Mindset

Age does not determine entry-level orientation. Mindset does. Watch for these signals regardless of where a candidate is in their career:

  • They describe their previous approach as “how I’ve always done it” without curiosity about whether there are better ways.
  • They resist feedback or treat standard-setting as criticism rather than as clarity.
  • They expect authority based on tenure rather than demonstrated mastery of the system.
  • They are reluctant to learn from people younger or less credentialed than themselves.
  • They frame starting over or starting fresh as a demotion rather than as an investment.

These are not disqualifiers if the person is genuinely willing to address them. But they are honest signals about the gap between where someone is and where the culture requires them to be. The entry-level orientation is not about the position title. It is about the posture toward learning, growth, and the willingness to be shaped.

What It Means to Build People Before You Build Things

The Japanese concept at the heart of this conversation, we build people before we build things is not a motivational slogan. It is a production philosophy. Toyota’s sustained excellence is not built on better equipment or better process documentation alone. It is built on the deliberate, sustained development of people who understand the system deeply enough to improve it, and who have been shaped by the right culture from early enough in their development to carry that culture naturally rather than effortfully.

The same principle applies to a construction company, a consulting practice, or a project team. The most powerful investment any organization can make is in the people who will carry the system forward, and the best time to make that investment is before the wrong habits are competing with the right ones. Entry-level is not a concession. It is a strategy. We are building people who build things. If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow and develop the next generation of construction leaders from the foundation up, the right way from the start.

A Challenge for Builders

Look at your own professional posture this week. Regardless of where you are in your career, ask whether you are approaching your current role with the entry-level orientation, the openness to being shaped, the willingness to start where the work needs you to start, the curiosity that treats every system as something to understand before something to judge. The leaders who hold that posture at every stage are the ones who keep developing. The ones who close it off because they feel they have earned the right to stop learning are the ones who plateau.

As W. Edwards Deming said, “It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best.”

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why prefer entry-level hires over experienced professionals?

Because entry-level hires do not require deprogramming from habits developed in dysfunctional environments. The investment goes entirely into programming the right culture, the right systems, and the right mindset from the beginning producing stronger long-term results with less resistance and less cultural friction than rebuilding over years of the wrong conditioning.

Does “entry-level” refer to age or to mindset?

Mindset. An experienced professional who approaches a new role with genuine openness, willingness to learn the system from the ground up, and no attachment to doing things the way they have always been done is operating with an entry-level orientation regardless of their age. The value is in the posture, not the years on the resume.

What does it mean practically to “build people before you build things”?

It means investing in the development of the people who will carry the system forward from training in Lean principles and field fundamentals, to cultural shaping around total participation, respect, and continuous improvement before they are deployed into production roles. The foundation of the person determines the quality and sustainability of everything they build.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

Coaching – Writing & Emails – Implementation Series

Read 17 min

The Email Test: What Your Writing Says About Everything Else You Do

There is a principle Jason Schroeder carries into every boot camp and coaching conversation, and it applies as much to the written word as it does to the schedule or the safety walk: how you do one thing is how you do everything.

A superintendent who says “I’m a great builder but I’m not really good at writing emails” has just revealed something important. Not about their writing. About their relationship with mastery. Because the truth is there is no such thing as a great superintendent who cannot write clearly. There is no such thing as a great project manager who avoids the financials. There is no such thing as a great surveyor who cannot take legible notes. The people who have genuinely mastered the big things have also disciplined themselves to master the small things. The email is not a minor inconvenience. It is a signal.

The Career Skill Nobody Talks About

Written communication in construction shows up everywhere. It shows up in RFIs that have to be interpreted instead of understood. It shows up in daily reports that nobody reads because nobody can follow them. It shows up in emails that slow the project team down because they are either too long, too short, or too confusing to act on.

And it shows up in careers. The people who make it to president, vice president, operations manager, project director, and general superintendent are not just great builders. They are skilled communicators. Their emails are clear. Their proposals are readable. Their meeting follow ups are precise. When they walk into an interview, a design meeting, or an OAC presentation, the written materials they produce reflect the same standard as everything else they do.

If your goal is to advance in this industry, written communication is not a nice to have skill that you will develop someday. It is a fundamental that will show up in every professional setting you will ever be in. And the gap between where most construction professionals are and where they need to be on this is significant.

Jason’s Story: What a Writing Course Actually Did

When Jason was working as an assistant superintendent, he enrolled at Rio Salado Community College and took a full course load alongside a demanding job. Among the courses was a writing class. He was getting straight A’s across the board. He was also being reshaped.

The writing course gave him what he did not know he was missing: structure. Before that coursework, his emails rambled. His RFIs were long winded. He used phrasing like “as per conversation” and tangled sentence structures that barely communicated what they were supposed to communicate. After it, he had a framework. An email begins with a clear purpose. The content is concise and organized. The point is reachable without effort on the reader’s part.

He says clearly that he is still not a great writer. But people can understand him. And in professional communication, that is the whole game. If the reader cannot understand what you wrote, the writing failed, regardless of how much effort went into producing it.

Jason’s recommendation is direct: if you have gaps in your writing, find a course. A night course, an online course, something. The investment is small and the return follows you for decades.

What Bad Looks Like

Before you can fix a problem you have to be honest about what it actually looks like. In construction email culture, the failure modes are consistent and recognizable:

  • The all caps email with one or two sentences and no context, which reads as either aggressive or incompetent and usually both
  •  The multi paragraph email that tells the reader everything the writer was thinking without arriving at a clear point or request
  •  The email with no structure, where the random thoughts of the writer’s mind appear on screen in the order they occurred
  •  The RFI that is so poorly worded that the design team has to interpret what is being asked before they can even begin to respond
  • The response that uses unfamiliar jargon, passive construction, and ambiguous references that require follow up emails just to clarify what the first one meant

Every one of these wastes time. When an email requires interpretation, the reader has to slow down, make assumptions, or send back a clarifying question. When an RFI is unclear, the response may not address the actual problem. When a daily report is illegible or disorganized, it fails as a record. Multiply these failures across a project team over a year and the cumulative cost is significant, in time, in rework, in miscommunication, and in relationships.

The Standard That Gets You There

A well written professional email is not complicated. It follows a pattern that works in almost every situation in construction.. Open with purpose. “I am writing to discuss the concrete placement scheduled for Thursday.” That sentence tells the reader immediately what this email is about and what it requires from them. There is no winding through context, backstory, or pleasantries before arriving at the point..State the relevant information concisely. Include what the reader needs to understand the situation, nothing more. If there is supporting documentation, reference it. If there is a decision needed, say what the options are and what you recommend. Close with a clear next step or request. “Please confirm by Wednesday afternoon.” The reader should never have to wonder what is being asked of them. This structure takes practice. It also takes an honest look at your current writing and the willingness to improve it, which is where most people stop.

How You Do One Thing

The superintendent who types in all caps because it is faster is telling you something about their relationship with precision. The project manager who sends three page emails that nobody reads is telling you something about their understanding of communication. The field engineer who does not know how to type is telling you something about their investment in the tools their career requires.

None of this is about perfection. Jason is transparent about the fact that he is still developing as a writer. But the commitment to developing is itself the point. People who are serious about their craft do not accept permanent weaknesses in areas that matter. They identify the gap and close it.

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. Part of what that development looks like is building the full professional skill set, written communication included, that separates career builders from career plateaus.

The Challenge This Week

Pull up your last five emails. Read them as if you received them from someone else. Are they clear? Do they open with a stated purpose? Do they ask for something specific? Are they the right length? And if you read them quickly, can you act on them without needing to ask a follow up question?

That audit will tell you more about your written communication than any course description. And whatever you find is where to start.

As Mark Twain wrote, “The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug.” In construction, the difference between a clear email and a confusing one can be the difference between a project that flows and one that constantly has to back up and ask what was meant.

Write clearly. Write concisely. Write with purpose. And master this like you would master anything else that matters in your career.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should a professional email be in a construction context?

Long enough to communicate the full point and short enough that the reader does not have to search for it. In most cases, that means a clear opening sentence, two to four sentences of relevant context, and a closing request or next step. If your email requires scrolling, it is probably too long.

What should I do if I know my writing is weak but I do not have time for a formal course?

Start with the structure: purpose in the first sentence, relevant details in the middle, specific request at the end. Apply it to every email you send for thirty days. You will improve faster through disciplined practice than through reading about writing.

Does typing speed actually matter that much for construction professionals?

Yes. If you cannot type efficiently, you will avoid written communication or rush through it, and both outcomes hurt your work. Learning to type is one of the highest return investments an early career construction professional can make.

What is the biggest mistake construction professionals make in RFIs specifically?

Not stating the actual question clearly. An RFI that describes a problem at length but never arrives at a specific, answerable question wastes everyone’s time. State the condition, identify what is unclear or missing, and ask a direct question that can receive a direct answer.

How does improving written communication affect career advancement in construction?

It signals maturity, professionalism, and systems thinking. Leaders who communicate clearly in writing are trusted with more responsibility and perceived as ready for greater leadership. It is one of the most visible indicators of executive readiness that exists in the field.

 

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

Work Ethic!

Read 17 min

Work Ethic in Construction Is Not Optional: Here Is What That Actually Means

There is a principle that Jason Schroeder says is easier to talk around than to say directly. So here it is: if you need to be coached into working harder, if someone has to convince you to show up early for a critical pour or stay through the weekend to erect a tower crane, you have a problem. And no amount of consulting, coaching, or training will fix a foundation that was never built.

Work ethic in construction is not a perk. It is not something that gets negotiated during an offer conversation. It is a baseline. And in an era where that baseline is increasingly up for debate, Jason is saying what a lot of superintendents are thinking but not saying out loud.

The Hiring Principle That Changes How You Build Teams

After years of running boot camps, coaching field teams, and building Elevate Construction from the ground up, Jason has settled on a principle that shapes how he thinks about hiring and development: it is far easier to take someone addicted to hard work and help them build balance than to take someone who has already settled into comfort and try to build urgency into them.

The direction of coaching matters. A superintendent who is burning out, skipping weekends with family, and grinding too hard needs help with boundaries, delegation, and recovery. That is a manageable coaching conversation. A person who watches football during work hours, is not reachable by the team, and considers 40 hours a ceiling before camping takes priority: that conversation is a different animal entirely. One person has too much of something valuable. The other person does not have it at all.

Jason describes this as the difference between weaning someone down versus weaning someone up. The first is possible. The second rarely works. If you are building a team or hiring for a project, look for people you will eventually have to slow down. Those are your builders.

Where Work Ethic Actually Comes From

Work ethic is not something a training program installs. It comes from home. Jason’s grandfather in law once told him to get on his knees every day and thank his parents for teaching him how to work. That landed. The people who show up to job sites ready to grind, ready to stay until the concrete is placed correctly, ready to answer the call at midnight when the basement floods, they almost always learned that posture somewhere before they ever set foot on a project.

This creates a real challenge for the industry. When parents teach kids that work is something to be minimized, that the goal is comfort and perks and personal time, and that hard manual work is somehow beneath the standard they should reach for, those kids show up to job sites without the wiring. And you cannot rewire an adult who has never experienced the satisfaction of full commitment to a hard thing.

What you can do is set clear expectations, model the culture, and hire accordingly. Not everyone will come from a family that taught this. But they need to find their way to it somehow before they can function at the level construction demands.

What the Work Actually Looks Like

Construction’s work culture is not abstract. Jason describes it in specific terms from his own career as a field engineer: four o’clock mornings before concrete pours. Staying through the night to complete lift drawings. Working Saturdays when the schedule demanded it. Answering a call at midnight about a flooded basement without checking whether it fell within designated hours.

He also tells the story of being asked to stay two weeks on a project in Southern California, flying from Texas where his family was, at a critical moment in a job’s completion. His first reaction was resistance. He wanted to go home. That was a righteous desire. But after reflecting on what the project actually needed, and what the superintendent had done for him, he recognized the moment for what it was: a time when the work required more than what was comfortable.

Construction has those moments. Critical scopes. Emergency responses. Tower cranes going up. Substantial completion deadlines. These are not optional participation events. They are the job. And the culture of a project team has to carry enough of a work ethic to respond when those moments arrive, not debate whether they are within someone’s preferred schedule.

Here is what that culture includes in practice:

  • Showing up before the crew to be prepared, not arriving when everyone else does 
  • Staying until the pour is right, not until the clock says it is time to leave 
  • Answering when the team calls, even when it is inconvenient 
  • Treating company time and resources as entrusted, not as personal to manage however feels right

The Levity Problem

One of the clearest observations Jason makes in this episode is about the relationship between perks and performance. The comfortable work environments, the flexibility, the culture events, the team celebrations: those are outcomes. They are what healthy, high performing, hard working teams earn for themselves over time. They are not entry level benefits or hiring incentives.

When someone asks for levity before they have delivered value, the organization has a problem. When a team member assumes that flexibility is a default rather than something earned through demonstrated commitment, the culture begins to erode. When the unspoken negotiation is “what do I get for showing up?” instead of “what can I contribute?”, the project is already at a disadvantage.

The inverse is also true. When a team has genuinely ground hard, delivered more than expected, and handled the critical moments without flinching, the leader who creates space for them to breathe, to celebrate, to enjoy a moment of levity is investing in people who have proven they deserve it. That is a completely different transaction.

Delivering More Than Your Paycheck

There is a standard Jason returns to repeatedly in his coaching and his leadership: deliver more value in your position than what you receive in your paycheck. Not slightly more. Noticeably more. Be the person your employer genuinely cannot afford to lose because of how much you contribute, not because of how difficult it would be to replace the institutional knowledge you are sitting on.

This is also a protection. People who over deliver do not stay anxious about their job security. They do not spend energy on office politics or positioning. They are too busy performing. And over time, they build something that cannot be taken away: a track record of showing up and delivering in situations that were genuinely hard.

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. The teams that consistently perform at the highest level are not necessarily the ones with the most talent. They are the ones with the strongest culture of commitment and the clearest sense of what the job actually requires.

The Challenge for This Week

Ask yourself honestly: are you running toward your work or away from it? Are you delivering more than your paycheck or negotiating for what you want before you have earned it? And if you lead a team, are you hiring people you will eventually need to slow down, or people you are constantly trying to accelerate?

Work ethic is the foundation. Everything else gets built on top of it. As Vince Lombardi said, “The only place success comes before work is in the dictionary.” Construction has always known this. The question is whether the next generation coming into the industry will learn it in time.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it possible to develop a strong work ethic if you were not raised with one?

Yes, but it requires a conscious decision followed by consistent action. Adults can build new habits, but they need environments and mentors that model what high commitment looks like and hold them to it. Surrounding yourself with hard working people accelerates the process.

How do you build a work ethic culture on a project where some team members are not there yet?

Model it from the top down. When superintendents and project managers are the first ones on site and the last to leave during critical windows, that behavior becomes the visible standard. Culture follows leadership behavior more than it follows policy or training.

How do you know when grinding too hard has crossed into something unhealthy?

When your family relationships are suffering chronically, your health is declining, and the pace is constant rather than driven by genuine project need, you have crossed the line. Work ethic includes knowing when the job demands more and when it is time to recover.

What do you say to someone who thinks work life balance means working fewer hours from day one?

The balance is something you build toward, not something you start with. Early career is the time to invest heavily, develop skills, and establish a reputation. The flexibility and balance come later, once you have built the capability and track record that earns them.

How does work ethic connect to flow and the kind of construction culture Jason teaches?

They are inseparable. A Takt system or a Last Planner process requires people who show up prepared, engaged, and committed to the plan. No planning system survives contact with a team that is not invested. Work ethic is what activates the system.

Word count: 1,628

 

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

Desire, not Circumstance! A Podcast about Boot Camps, Mindset, Heaven, and Progress

Read 20 min

What Boot Camps Actually Reveal About Your People (And Why That Is the Point)

After running roughly 35 week long boot camps, plus a significant number of one and two day events and masterminds, Jason Schroeder has noticed a pattern that he used to find troubling and now finds clarifying. About five to fifteen percent of participants do not make it through. Some disengage quietly. Some leave midway. And a small number walk out completely, then turn around and criticize the program to their managers without ever sharing that feedback directly.

For a while, Jason spent energy trying to figure out how to screen those people out before they arrived. That thinking turned out to be the wrong question. Because boot camps are not failing those people. Boot camps are revealing them. And that revelation is exactly what organizations need.

The One Variable That Explains Everything

The dividing line is not personality type. It is not introversion or extroversion. It is not age, role, or time in the industry. The dividing line that predicts who thrives in a boot camp and who unravels is the fixed mindset versus the growth mindset.

A fixed mindset person defines themselves by what they already know. Challenge feels like an attack. Feedback feels like criticism of who they are. Failure feels personal. These are the people who, when pressed to grow, tend to disengage, blame the program, or leave. They have arrived. They are done learning. They want the comfort zone and nothing else.

A growth mindset person defines themselves by what they are learning. They take feedback. They embrace difficulty as a natural part of progress. They celebrate others growing rather than feeling threatened by it. When pressed, they push back harder in the right direction. These are the people who come up to the instructors at the end of a boot camp looking like something shifted inside them, because it did.

Both types show up on job sites every day. Boot camps make the distinction visible in a way that three years of routine project work never will.

The SEAL Parallel That Changed How Jason Thinks About This

Navy SEAL BUD/S training, the basic underwater demolition course, is famously demanding. Historically, around sixty percent of candidates do not complete it. The program is not designed to make every person into a SEAL. It is designed to reveal who already has what it takes and who does not. The training does not manufacture mental toughness. It surfaces it, or surfaces its absence.

The instructors do not apologize for this. The high attrition rate is not a flaw in the program. It is the program working correctly.

Elevate Construction boot camps operate on the same principle. They are not designed to be comfortable. They are designed to be a circumstance that shows people who they are. As James Allen wrote, “Circumstance does not make the man, it reveals him to himself.” A week long boot camp is a concentrated circumstance. The people who come through it with a growth mindset flourish. The people who do not have one find that out about themselves. And that information is valuable for everyone involved, including the person who did not make it.

What You Can Already See on Your Job Site

Here is what Jason has observed after years of running these programs and touring the projects of the people who went through them: the results are not subtle.

In a large organizational transformation program, eighty percent of participants chose to pursue their certifications after the boot camp experience. Twenty percent did not. When Jason and his team toured the certified group’s projects afterward, they found something remarkable across the board: clean sites, strong cultures, functioning Last Planner systems, Takt planning huddles working at a high level, workers approaching during tours to talk about how things had improved, and owners flying people in from other locations to see how a project was supposed to be run.

The twenty percent who did not certify? Their projects were still dirty, still running late, still operating on crash landings and reactive chaos.

One program. Two groups. Dramatically different outcomes. The boot camp did not create those outcomes. It identified the mindsets that would produce them.

Here are the signals you can already see on any active project:

  • People who are learning, asking questions, taking feedback, and staying curious even when things are hard are operating in growth mindset mode 
  • People who have stopped learning, avoid feedback, protect their turf, and compete instead of collaborate are operating in fixed mindset mode 
  • People who cannot work alongside others without tearing them down are a different category entirely, and they belong in a direct conversation about organizational fit

Boot camps organize these observations into a single intensive window instead of spreading them across years of slow project work.

What Your Organization Owes Every Person in It

There is a principle underneath all of this that Jason holds firmly: people should not be condemned by circumstance. A worker who spent three years on a poorly run project with bad leadership did not fail. The system around them failed. That person deserves the opportunity to be seen in a fair environment, to be given the tools and the challenge, and to choose who they want to be.

This is one of the deepest arguments for structured boot camps and organizational training programs. Without them, promotions and development opportunities get allocated based on who was on the right job with the right boss at the right time. That is not equity. It is circumstance masquerading as merit. A growth mindset person who was stuck on a broken project for two years should have the opportunity to show who they are in an environment designed to surface it.

Boot camps create that environment. They give every participant, regardless of their project history or prior circumstances, the chance to demonstrate their mindset, their adaptability, and their commitment to getting better. The people who have it shine. The people who do not reveal that too, and that clarity allows the organization to make honest decisions rather than circumstantial ones.

The System That Builds Toward This

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. The companies that invest in structured development programs are not just training people. They are building a system that surfaces their best people, identifies who needs support, and creates the organizational clarity that sustained performance requires.

The inverse of that is an organization that runs everyone through the same routine project cycle and then wonders why it cannot identify its next generation of leaders. If you have never put your team through a real diagnostic, you do not actually know who your growth mindset people are. You know who was lucky enough to be on the right job at the right time.

The Challenge for Your Organization

If your company does not have something like a boot camp, build one. It does not have to be a week long. It does not have to replicate everything Elevate Construction does. But it should be structured, challenging, and designed to push people past their comfort zone and into their growth zone. It should create the conditions for people to show who they are.

Then pay attention. Watch who rises. Watch who disengages. Watch who blames the program for their own discomfort. The data those observations generate about your people is more valuable than anything you will learn from three years of routine project reviews.

As James Allen wrote in As a Man Thinketh, “Circumstance does not make the man, it reveals him to himself.” Give your team the circumstance. Let people choose their path. Then build the organization around the ones who choose to grow.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a fixed mindset and a growth mindset in practical terms on a construction project?

A fixed mindset person on a project tends to protect what they already know, resist new systems, avoid feedback, and treat challenges to their methods as personal attacks. They are often the last to adopt new planning tools, the most resistant to coaching, and the quickest to point blame outward when things go wrong. A growth mindset person on the same project asks questions, tries the new system even when it feels uncomfortable, takes feedback as information rather than criticism, and tends to improve measurably over the course of a program. The distinction shows up in behavior, not attitude surveys.

What should a company do with the five to fifteen percent who do not make it through a boot camp?

First, recognize that the boot camp revealed something important that may have stayed hidden for years otherwise. Then have an honest conversation. Some people in that group may be in the wrong role, not the wrong organization. Some may need a different kind of support or a second opportunity in a smaller setting. And some have simply made clear through their behavior that the organization is not the right fit. Treating that clarity as useful information rather than a failure of the program is the right frame. The boot camp did its job.

How do you design a boot camp that is genuinely revealing rather than just difficult?

The difficulty has to be purposeful and connected to real skills and real scenarios. Arbitrary difficulty reveals nothing useful. The best boot camp designs push people into situations that require them to make decisions under pressure, give and receive feedback with their peers, think through problems they have not encountered before, and collaborate with people they do not already know well. When those conditions are present, the fixed versus growth mindset distinction surfaces naturally. People cannot perform their way through it. They have to actually engage.

Is it fair to use boot camp performance as a predictor of long term performance?

The data Jason has observed across dozens of programs says yes, with an important qualifier. The predictor is not whether someone struggled during the boot camp. Struggle is expected and often a good sign. The predictor is how someone responds to the struggle. Someone who struggles and keeps engaging, who takes feedback and adjusts, who stays in the room even when it is hard, is showing the growth mindset that tends to produce strong long term results. Someone who disengages, blames external factors, or refuses to participate is showing the fixed mindset that tends to stagnate regardless of what the organization provides.

What if leadership has a fixed mindset? Does a boot camp still work?

It works at revealing the problem, but it cannot fix it from the bottom up. If the leaders who send people to boot camp return to a fixed mindset culture when those people come back, the growth that happened in the program will erode quickly. The most effective organizational transformations happen when leadership goes through the same kind of diagnostic experience as the people they lead. When the superintendent and the project manager have also been pushed, have also been challenged, and have also chosen growth, the culture they come back to sustains what the boot camp started.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

Moving Walkways How to Leverage Your Support Staff

Read 21 min

Should You Have a Safety Manager on Site? You Are Asking the Wrong Question

There is a debate that keeps surfacing in construction circles. Should a project have a dedicated safety manager on site, or does that position make the rest of the team go soft? Does a quality control role sharpen performance, or does it give everyone else an excuse to stop caring? The argument goes back and forth, and most of the time, it stays stuck at the level of strategy. Add the position or do not add it. That is the wrong question entirely.

Jason Schroeder found the answer in an airport moving walkway, and once you hear the analogy, you will never look at your specialist support roles the same way again.

Three Speeds on the Same Walkway

Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport has a long corridor between gate sets, and it is equipped with the kind of moving walkways that are supposed to make the journey faster. Jason noticed something on a recent trip through that corridor. Some people stepped onto the walkway and kept walking, moving at their normal pace with the mechanical assist beneath them. They flew down the corridor. Others bypassed the walkway entirely and walked alongside it on the regular floor. They moved at a solid, steady pace. And then there was the third group: the ones who stepped onto the walkway, stopped completely, and just stood there, being carried along at a crawl, slower than the people walking on the regular floor next to them.

Three options. Three different results. Same walkway, same corridor, same destination.

Walk without the walkway: you make solid progress at a consistent pace, fully responsible for your own momentum. Walk on the walkway: you add your effort to the mechanical assist and cover ground at roughly double the pace, with less friction and more output. Stand on the walkway and stop: you go slower than if you had never used the walkway at all, and you block everyone behind you in the process.

The Analogy That Changes Everything

Now apply those three modes to a construction project that has a dedicated safety manager, a quality control specialist, a BIM coordinator, or a survey support position.

A project team without any of those support roles is walking on its own. It can be done. The team owns everything, carries everything, and moves at whatever pace their discipline allows. Results depend entirely on the strength and habits of the people in the field.

A project team with a dedicated safety manager, where the superintendent and the project manager stay fully engaged, use the resource, coordinate actively, and treat it as an amplifier: that team is walking on the moving walkway. The support role multiplies the team’s effort. Safety gets sharper. Quality gets tighter. The specialist handles documentation and systems while the leaders stay locked in on culture, behavior, and accountability. The whole team moves faster with less friction.

A project team with a dedicated safety manager, where the superintendent checks the box, delegates ownership, disengages from the work, and assumes the specialist will handle it: that team has stepped onto the walkway and stopped. The support position does not amplify anything because the team stopped adding their own effort. The project becomes slower, less safe, and less accountable than it would have been if the team had simply owned it without any specialist help at all.

This is the insight that reframes the entire debate. The question was never whether to have a safety manager on site. The question is always: what is the culture of the team that will use that resource?

Culture Is the Variable That Controls Everything

Here is the principle that sits underneath the analogy: culture eats strategy for breakfast. Every time.

The strategy is the walkway. The strategy is the safety manager or the quality role or the BIM coordinator. Strategies are tools. They can be excellent tools. But a tool in the hands of the wrong culture produces the wrong result. A walkway designed to accelerate movement becomes an obstacle when the culture of the people using it defaults to passivity. A safety manager designed to elevate a project becomes a liability when the culture around them defaults to delegation and disengagement.

What is culture? It is the common beliefs and actions of a group. It is the story the team tells about who they are and what they do. A culture of ownership says: this help makes us faster, so we will add our effort to it and go. A culture of passivity says: this help is here, so we do not have to go anymore. Both cultures can exist inside the same company, on the same type of project, with access to the same resources. The resource does not determine the result. The culture does.

This is why the debate about whether to add a specialist position never resolves cleanly. Two teams can receive the same resource and produce completely opposite outcomes. The conversation needs to move upstream, past the strategy question, and land on the culture question.

What Cannot Be Delegated

There is an eternal truth that Jason carries into every boot camp and coaching conversation, and it applies directly here: superintendents and project managers do not delegate safety and quality. It does not happen. It cannot work. You can have people help you. You can lead a team. You can use every specialist resource available. But the moment a superintendent points to the safety manager and says that person is in charge of safety on this job, the project is already in trouble.

Safety is not a checklist item to hand off. Quality is not a role to assign and forget. These are leadership responsibilities that sit inside the superintendent and the project manager regardless of who else is on the team. The safety manager exists to amplify and support, not to absorb ownership that belongs to field leadership. When that distinction collapses, the team has stepped off the walkway in the worst possible way.

Here is what that looks like in practice:

  • A superintendent who conducts their own daily site walks and uses the safety manager to sharpen the system is walking on the walkway
  •  A superintendent who waits for the safety manager to flag a hazard before acting is standing still and hoping the walkway carries them 
  • A project manager who integrates quality ownership into every schedule conversation is walking on the walkway 
  • A project manager who signs off on a quality report without reading it because there is a QC manager on site has stepped on and stopped

The distinction is not subtle once you see it. And the results are not subtle either.

Building the Right Culture First

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. The teams that get the most out of specialist support positions are the ones that already carry a culture of ownership. They use the resource as an accelerant, not a substitute.

The diagnostic question for any leader adding a support role to a project is not: will this position help? Of course it will help, if the culture uses it correctly. The question is: does our team understand that this resource is meant to multiply their effort, not replace it? Have we made that expectation explicit? Do we hold people accountable to it?

If the answer to those questions is yes, add the resource and watch the project accelerate. If the answer is uncertain, the work to do first is cultural. Get the team clear on their identity. Build shared expectations around ownership. Establish that every specialist resource on the project exists to help the team go faster together, not to take something off anyone’s plate.

The Challenge This Week

Look at the specialist support positions on your current project. Safety, quality, BIM, survey, field engineering, whatever they are. Now be honest about which of the three modes your team is operating in. Are you walking alongside the walkway, fully capable but not using the resource fully? Are you walking on it and amplifying your effort? Or have you stepped on and stopped, delegating ownership and losing ground?

The process is not the problem. The walkway is not the problem. The question is always the same: is the culture of the people using it one of adding their efforts, or subtracting them?

As W. Edwards Deming wrote, “Quality is everyone’s responsibility.” Not the quality manager’s. Not the safety manager’s. Everyone’s. Every superintendent. Every project manager. Every foreman on the crew. The specialist supports that responsibility. It does not replace it.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you know if your team has the right culture to benefit from a specialist support role?

Watch what happens when a problem surfaces. In a culture of ownership, the superintendent and the project manager are already aware of the problem before the specialist flags it, and they are working the solution together. In a culture of delegation, the specialist becomes the primary source of awareness, and the leaders respond reactively rather than proactively. The culture shows itself in how quickly field leadership notices problems and how directly they engage with solving them.

What if I inherited a project team with a passive culture? Can it be corrected?

Yes, but it requires explicit language and visible behavior from leadership. The first step is naming the expectation clearly: the safety manager, quality position, or support role is here to make us faster, not to take ownership away from the team. Follow that statement with accountability. Conduct your own walks. Ask your own questions. Show the team what engaged ownership looks like, and hold people to that standard consistently. Culture shifts when behavior shifts, and behavior shifts when leadership models and enforces the change.

Should every project have a dedicated safety manager, or only certain size projects?

The analogy points to culture as the determining variable, not project size. A large project with a passive culture will be less safe with a dedicated safety manager than a smaller project with a culture of ownership and no dedicated position. That said, project scale, complexity, trade count, and regulatory environment all affect the practical need for specialist support. The decision should factor in both the operational need and an honest assessment of whether the team culture is prepared to use the resource as an amplifier rather than a substitute.

How do you explain this principle to a team that has been operating in delegation mode for a long time?

Use the walkway analogy directly. It is concrete, visual, and easy to remember. Walk the team through the three modes. Show them where the project currently sits. Then paint a clear picture of what operating in walk on the walkway mode looks like in practice on your specific project. People generally do not resist ownership when they understand what is expected and when the leader models it alongside them. The problem in delegation cultures is usually that no one ever made the expectation clear.

Can a team start in walk alongside mode and move to walk on the walkway mode over time?

Absolutely, and this is often the healthiest progression. A team that builds strong ownership habits without specialist support has already developed the cultural foundation needed to amplify those habits with a dedicated resource. When the specialist position is added later, the team knows exactly how to use it because they already carry the identity of full ownership. The risk runs the other way: adding specialist support before ownership culture is established can interrupt the development of that culture entirely.

 

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here) 
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here) 
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

    Related Books

    The First Planner System: The Project Planning System for Executives, Project Managers, and Superintendents in Pre-construction - Book 2
    Pull Planning For Builders: How to Pull Plan Right, Respect People, and Gain Time (The Art of the Builder)
    The Ten Improvements to Production Planning: What Lean Builders Can Do To Improve Short Interval Planning (The Art of the Builder)

    Related Books

    The First Planner System: The Project Planning System for Executives, Project Managers, and Superintendents in Pre-construction - Book 2
    Built to Fail: Why Construction Projects Take So Long, Cost Too Much, And How to Fix It

    Related Books

    The First Planner System: The Project Planning System for Executives, Project Managers, and Superintendents in Pre-construction - Book 2
    The 10 Myths of CPM: How The Critical Path Method Systematizes Disrespect for People
    Calumet "K"

    faq

    General Training Overview

    What construction leadership training programs does LeanTakt offer?
    LeanTakt offers Superintendent/PM Boot Camps, Virtual Takt Production System® Training, Onsite Takt Simulations, and Foreman & Field Engineer Training. Each program is tailored to different leadership levels in construction.
    Who should attend LeanTakt’s training programs?
    Superintendents, Project Managers, Foremen, Field Engineers, and trade partners who want to improve planning, communication, and execution on projects.
    How do these training programs improve project performance?
    They provide proven Lean and Takt systems that reduce chaos, improve reliability, strengthen collaboration, and accelerate project delivery.
    What makes LeanTakt’s training different from other construction courses?
    Our programs are hands-on, field-tested, and focused on practical application—not just classroom theory.
    Do I need prior Lean or takt planning experience to attend?
    No. Our programs cover foundational principles before moving into advanced applications.
    How quickly can I apply what I learn on real projects?
    Most participants begin applying new skills immediately, often the same week they complete the program.
    Are these trainings designed for both office and field leaders?
    Yes. We equip both project managers and superintendents with tools that connect field and office operations.
    What industries benefit most from LeanTakt training?
    Commercial, multifamily, residential, industrial, and infrastructure projects all benefit from flow-based planning.
    Do participants receive certificates after completing training?
    Yes. Every participant receives a LeanTakt Certificate of Completion.
    Is LeanTakt training recognized in the construction industry?
    Yes. Our programs are widely respected among leading GCs, subcontractors, and construction professionals.

    Superintendent / PM Boot Camp

    What is the Superintendent & Project Manager Boot Camp?
    It’s a 5-day immersive training for superintendents and PMs to master Lean leadership, takt planning, and project flow.
    How long does the Superintendent/PM Boot Camp last?
    Five full days of hands-on training.
    What topics are covered in the Boot Camp curriculum?
    Lean leadership, Takt Planning, logistics, daily planning, field-office communication, and team health.
    How does the Boot Camp improve leadership and scheduling skills?
    Yes. You’ll learn how to run day huddles, team meetings, worker huddles, and Lean coordination processes.
    Who is the Boot Camp best suited for?
    Construction leaders responsible for delivering projects, including Superintendents, PMs, and Field Leaders.
    What real-world challenges are simulated during the Boot Camp?
    Schedule breakdowns, trade conflicts, logistics issues, and communication gaps.
    Will I learn Takt Planning at the Boot Camp?
    Yes. Takt Planning is a core focus of the Boot Camp.
    How does this Boot Camp compare to traditional PM certification?
    It’s practical and execution-based rather than exam-based. You learn by doing, not just studying theory.
    Can my entire project team attend the Boot Camp together?
    Yes. Teams attending together often see the greatest results.
    What kind of real-world challenges do we simulate?
    Improved project flow, fewer delays, better team communication, and stronger leadership confidence.

    Takt Production System® Virtual Training

    What is the Virtual Takt Production System® Training?
    It’s an expert-led online program that teaches Lean construction teams how to implement takt planning.
    How does virtual takt training work?
    Delivered online via live sessions, interactive discussions, and digital tools.
    What are the benefits of online takt planning training?
    Convenience, global accessibility, real-time learning, and immediate application.
    Can I access the virtual training from anywhere?
    Yes. It’s fully web-based and accessible worldwide.
    Can I access the virtual training from anywhere?
    Yes. It’s fully web-based and accessible worldwide.
    What skills will I gain from the Virtual TPS® Training?
    Macro and micro Takt planning, weekly updates, flow management, and CPM integration.
    How long does the virtual training program take?
    The program is typically completed in multiple live sessions across several days.
    Can I watch recordings if I miss a session?
    Yes. Recordings are available to all participants.
    Do you offer group access or company licenses for the virtual training?
    Yes. Teams and companies can enroll together at discounted rates.
    How does the Virtual TPS® Training integrate with CPM tools?
    We show how to align Takt with CPM schedules like Primavera P6 or MS Project.

    Onsite Takt Simulation

    What is a Takt Simulation in construction training?
    It’s a live, interactive workshop that demonstrates takt planning on-site.
    How does the Takt Simulation workshop work?
    Teams participate in hands-on exercises to learn the flow and rhythm of a Takt-based project.
    Can I choose between a 1-day or 2-day Takt Simulation?
    Yes. We offer flexible formats to fit your team’s schedule and needs.
    Who should participate in the Takt Simulation workshop?
    Superintendents, PMs, site supervisors, contractors, and engineers.
    How does a Takt Simulation improve project planning?
    It shows teams how to structure zones, manage flow, and coordinate trades in real time.
    What will my team learn from the onsite simulation?
    How to build and maintain takt plans, manage buffers, and align trade partners.
    Is the simulation tailored to my specific project type?
    Yes. Scenarios can be customized to match your project.
    How do Takt Simulations improve trade partner coordination?
    They strengthen collaboration by making handoffs visible and predictable.
    What results can I expect from an onsite Takt Simulation?
    Improved schedule reliability, better trade collaboration, and reduced rework.
    How many people can join a Takt Simulation session?
    Group sizes are flexible, but typically 15–30 participants per session.

    Foreman & Field Engineer Training

    What is Foreman & Field Engineer Training?
    It’s an on-demand, practical program that equips foremen and engineers with leadership and planning skills.
    How does this training prepare emerging leaders?
    By teaching communication, crew management, and execution strategies.
    Is the training on-demand or scheduled?
    On-demand, tailored to your team’s timing and needs.
    What skills do foremen and engineers gain from this training?
    Planning, safety leadership, coordination, and communication.
    How does the training improve communication between field and office?
    It builds shared systems that align superintendents, engineers, and managers.
    Can the training be customized for my team’s needs?
    Yes. Programs are tailored for your project or company.
    What makes this program different from generic leadership courses?
    It’s construction-specific, field-tested, and focused on real project application.
    How do foremen and field engineers apply this training immediately?
    They can use new systems for planning, coordination, and daily crew management right away.
    Is the training suitable for small construction companies?
    Yes. Small and large teams alike benefit from building flow-based leadership skills.

    Testimonials

    Testimonials

    "The bootcamp I was apart of was amazing. Its was great while it was happening but also had a very profound long-term motivation that is still pushing me to do more, be more. It sounds a little strange to say that a construction bootcamp changed my life, but it has. It has opened my eyes to many possibilities on how a project can be successfully run. It’s also provided some very positive ideas on how people can and should be treated in construction.

    I am a hungry person by nature, so it doesn’t take a lot to get to participate. I loved the way it was not just about participating, it was also about doing it with conviction, passion, humility and if it wasn’t portrayed that way you had to do it again."

    "It's great to be a part of a company that has similar values to my own, especially regarding how we treat our trade partners. The idea of "you gotta make them feel worse to make them do better" has been preached at me for years. I struggled with this as you will not find a single psychology textbook stating these beliefs. In fact it is quite the opposite, and causing conflict is a recipe for disaster. I'm still honestly in shock I have found a company that has based its values on scientific facts based on human nature. That along with the Takt scheduling system makes everything even better. I am happy to be a part of a change that has been long overdue in our industry!"

    "Wicked team building, so valuable for the forehumans of the sub trades to know the how and why. Great tools and resources. Even though I am involved and use the tools every day, I feel like everything is fresh and at the forefront to use"

    "Jason and his team did an incredible job passing on the overall theory of what they do. After 3 days of running through the course I cannot see any holes in their concept. It works. it's proven to work and I am on board!"

    "Loved the pull planning, Takt planning, and logistic model planning. Well thought out and professional"

    "The Super/PM Boot Camp was an excellent experience that furthered my understanding of Lean Practices. The collaboration, group involvement, passion about real project site experiences, and POSITIVE ENERGY. There are no dull moments when you head into this training. Jason and Mr. Montero were always on point and available to help in the break outs sessions. Easily approachable to talk too during breaks and YES, it was fun. I recommend this training for any PM or Superintendent that wants to further their career."

    agenda

    Day 1

    Foundations & Macro Planning

    day2

    Norm Planning & Flow Optimization

    day3

    Advanced Tools & Comparisons

    day4

    Buffers, Controls & Finalization

    day5

    Control Systems & Presentations

    faq

    UNDERSTANDING THE TRAINING

    What is the Virtual Takt Production System® Training by LeanTakt?
    It’s an expert-led online program designed to teach construction professionals how to implement Takt Planning to create flow, eliminate chaos, and align teams across the project lifecycle.
    Who should take the LeanTakt virtual training?
    This training is ideal for Superintendents, Project Managers, Engineers, Schedulers, Trade Partners, and Lean Champions looking to improve planning and execution.
    What topics are covered in the online Takt Production System® course?
    The course covers macro and micro Takt planning, zone creation, buffers, weekly updates, flow management, trade coordination, and integration with CPM tools.
    What makes LeanTakt’s virtual training different from other Lean construction courses?
    Unlike theory-based courses, this training is hands-on, practical, field-tested, and includes live coaching tailored to your actual projects.
    Do I get a certificate after completing the online training?
    Yes. Upon successful completion, participants receive a LeanTakt Certificate of Completion, which validates your knowledge and readiness to implement Takt.

    VALUE AND RESULTS

    What are the benefits of Takt Production System® training for my team?
    It helps teams eliminate bottlenecks, improve planning reliability, align trades, and reduce the chaos typically seen in traditional construction schedules.
    How much time and money can I save with Takt Planning?
    Many projects using Takt see 15–30% reductions in time and cost due to better coordination, fewer delays, and increased team accountability.
    What’s the ROI of virtual Takt training for construction teams?
    The ROI comes from faster project delivery, reduced rework, improved communication, and better resource utilization — often 10x the investment.
    Will this training reduce project delays or rework?
    Yes. By visualizing flow and aligning trades, Takt Planning reduces miscommunication and late handoffs — major causes of delay and rework.
    How soon can I expect to see results on my projects?
    Most teams report seeing improvement in coordination and productivity within the first 2–4 weeks of implementation.

    PLANNING AND SCHEDULING TOPICS

    What is Takt Planning and how is it used in construction?
    Takt Planning is a Lean scheduling method that creates flow by aligning work with time and space, using rhythm-based planning to coordinate teams and reduce waste.
    What’s the difference between macro and micro Takt plans?
    Macro Takt plans focus on the overall project flow and phase durations, while micro Takt plans break down detailed weekly tasks by zone and crew.
    Will I learn how to build a complete Takt plan from scratch?
    Yes. The training teaches you how to build both macro and micro Takt plans tailored to your project, including workflows, buffers, and sequencing.
    How do I update and maintain a Takt schedule each week?
    You’ll learn how to conduct weekly updates using lookaheads, trade feedback, zone progress, and digital tools to maintain schedule reliability.
    Can I integrate Takt Planning with CPM or Primavera P6?
    Yes. The training includes guidance on aligning Takt plans with CPM logic, showing how both systems can work together effectively.
    Will I have access to the instructors during the training?
    Yes. You’ll have opportunities to ask questions, share challenges, and get real-time feedback from LeanTakt coaches.
    Can I ask questions specific to my current project?
    Absolutely. In fact, we encourage it — the training is designed to help you apply Takt to your active jobs.
    Is support available after the training ends?
    Yes. You can access follow-up support, coaching, and community forums to help reinforce implementation.
    Can your tools be customized to my project or team?
    Yes. We offer customizable templates and implementation options to fit different project types, teams, and tech stacks.
    When is the best time in a project lifecycle to take this training?
    Ideally before or during preconstruction, but teams have seen success implementing it mid-project as well.

    APPLICATION & TEAM ADOPTION

    What changes does my team need to adopt Takt Planning?
    Teams must shift from reactive scheduling to proactive, flow-based planning with clear commitments, reliable handoffs, and a visual management mindset.
    Do I need any prior Lean or scheduling experience?
    No prior Lean experience is required. The course is structured to take you from foundational principles to advanced application.
    How long does it take for teams to adapt to Takt Planning?
    Most teams adapt within 2–6 weeks, depending on project size and how fully the system is adopted across roles.
    Can this training work for smaller companies or projects?
    Absolutely. Takt is scalable and especially powerful for small teams seeking better structure and predictability.
    What role do trade partners play in using Takt successfully?
    Trade partners are key collaborators. They help shape realistic flow, manage buffers, and provide feedback during weekly updates.

    VIRTUAL FORMAT & ACCESSIBILITY

    Can I access the virtual training from anywhere?
    Yes. The training is fully accessible online, making it ideal for distributed teams across regions or countries.
    Is this training available internationally?
    Yes. LeanTakt trains teams around the world and supports global implementations.
    Can I watch recordings if I miss a session?
    Yes. All sessions are recorded and made available for later viewing through your training portal.
    Do you offer group access or company licenses?
    Yes. Teams can enroll together at discounted rates, and we offer licenses for enterprise rollouts.
    What technology or setup do I need to join the virtual training?
    A reliable internet connection, webcam, Miro, Spreadsheets, and access to Zoom.

    faq

    GENERAL FAQS

    What is the Superintendent / PM Boot Camp?
    It’s a hands-on leadership training for Superintendents and Project Managers in the construction industry focused on Lean systems, planning, and communication.
    Who is this Boot Camp for?
    Construction professionals including Superintendents, Project Managers, Field Engineers, and Foremen looking to improve planning, leadership, and project flow.
    What makes this construction boot camp different?
    Real-world project simulations, expert coaching, Lean principles, team-based learning, and post-camp support — all built for field leaders.
    Is this just a seminar or classroom training?
    No. It’s a hands-on, immersive experience. You’ll plan, simulate, collaborate, and get feedback — not sit through lectures.
    What is the focus of the training?
    Leadership, project planning, communication, Lean systems, and integrating office-field coordination.

    CURRICULUM & OUTCOMES

    What topics are covered in the Boot Camp?
    Takt planning, day planning, logistics, pre-construction, team health, communication systems, and more.
    What is Takt Planning and why is it taught?
    Takt is a Lean planning method that creates flow and removes chaos. It helps teams deliver projects on time with less stress.
    Will I learn how to lead field teams more effectively?
    Yes. This boot camp focuses on real leadership challenges and gives you systems and strategies to lead high-performing teams.
    Do you cover daily huddles and meeting systems?
    Yes. You’ll learn how to run day huddles, team meetings, worker huddles, and Lean coordination processes.
    What kind of real-world challenges do we simulate?
    You’ll work through real project schedules, logistical constraints, leadership decisions, and field-office communication breakdowns.

    LOGISTICS & FORMAT

    Is the training in-person or virtual?
    It’s 100% in-person to maximize learning, feedback, and team-based interaction.
    How long is the Boot Camp?
    It runs for 5 full days.
    Where is the Boot Camp held?
    Locations vary — typically hosted in a professional training center or project setting. Contact us for the next available city/date.
    Do you offer follow-up coaching after the Boot Camp?
    Yes. Post-camp support is included so you can apply what you’ve learned on your projects.
    Can I ask questions about my actual project?
    Absolutely. That’s encouraged — bring your current challenges.

    PRICING & VALUE

    How much does the Boot Camp cost?
    $5,000 per person.
    Are there any group discounts?
    Yes — get 10% off when 4 or more people from the same company attend.
    What’s the ROI for sending my team?
    Better planning = fewer delays, smoother coordination, and higher team morale — all of which boost productivity and reduce costs.
    Will I see results immediately?
    Most participants apply what they’ve learned as soon as they return to the jobsite — especially with follow-up support.
    Can this replace other leadership training?
    In many cases, yes. This Boot Camp is tailored to construction professionals, unlike generic leadership seminars.

    SEO-BASED / HIGH-INTENT SEARCH QUESTIONS

    What is the best leadership training for construction Superintendents?
    Our Boot Camp offers real-world, field-focused leadership training tailored for construction leaders.
    What’s included in a Superintendent Boot Camp?
    Takt planning, day planning, logistics, pre-construction systems, huddles, simulations, and more.
    Where can I find Lean construction training near me?
    Check our upcoming in-person sessions or request a private boot camp in your city.
    How can I improve field and office communication on a project?
    This Boot Camp teaches you tools and systems to connect field and office workflows seamlessly.
    Is there a training to help reduce chaos on construction sites?
    Yes — this program is built specifically to turn project chaos into flow through structured leadership.