Fingerprint on the process

Posted on December 2, 2025December 2, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 5 min

Do You Have Your Fingerprint on the Process?

Hey everyone! What I want to talk about today is a simple, powerful concept that I’ve never been able to express clearly until now. After diving into Toyota by Toyota (which, by the way, is an absolute masterpiece), I finally found the words.

It’s this:
We must have our fingerprint on the process.

What That Means (And Why It Matters)

This came from a story shared by Robert Martichenko, a logistics leader I deeply admire. Back when he started working with Toyota in North America, he explained that the logistics managers didn’t just outsource route planning or rely on automation. They built the routes themselves by hand.

Why?

Because they wanted ownership. They wanted their fingerprint on the process.

They researched Department of Transportation rules. They studied distribution centers. They manually mapped delivery routes. Only after they understood the process inside and out did they automate it.

The Human Touch Comes First

This mindset is absolutely critical in construction. Before you automate something or delegate a task whether it’s schedule building, lift drawings, or AI-generated plans, you need to understand it deeply yourself.

This applies to:

Building your own master schedules.
Reviewing AI outputs instead of blindly trusting them.
Personally managing handoffs, logistics, and workflows.
Coaching your people with actual field presence.

If you just send instructions and hope it works out, you’re not leading. Like Patton said, “10 percent is communication. 90 percent is assuring through field presence that it actually gets done.”

Stop Delegating, Start Owning

When we say “Do I have my fingerprint on this process” it forces us to reflect:

Have I spent time at the Gemba.
Do I understand the inputs, outputs, and flow.
Have I seen it for myself.
Can I manage it with wisdom, not just oversight.

This is where lean comes alive, not in theory, but in your habits, your presence, your leadership.

You build people including yourself before you build things. And it starts by embedding yourself into the process.

Key Takeaway

Automation is powerful but only when it follows ownership. If you want stability, flow, and excellence, you need to put your fingerprint on the process first. Go see. Get involved. Then lead.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here)
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here)
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

On we go

Open door policy with trades

Posted on December 2, 2025December 2, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 7 min

Why Open Door Policies with Trade Partners Matter

Hey everyone, welcome to this quick blog. A couple days ago, I came across a powerful concept while listening to Toyota by Toyota, an incredible book that isn’t on Audible, so I used Speechify to scan and listen to it. This book is packed with lean principles, and one story in particular really stuck with me.

At Toyota, when a vendor signs up to work with them, they also sign up for an open door policy. That means Toyota’s people can walk into their vendor’s shop, office, or warehouse at any time. They’re welcome. That kind of access isn’t about control, it’s about trust, partnership, and proactive leadership.

It reminded me: we need that same mindset in construction.

We Need to Show Up Before the Work Begins

If you’re managing a high-risk trade or install like a self-climbing core form on a tower, you don’t wait until it hits your site. You go see it in action, with your foreman and crew, before day one. That’s just smart leadership.

As superintendents and PMs, we must spend time with our trade partners before the work starts, queuing them up, getting familiar with their crew, tools, and systems. That’s how you protect flow. That’s how you prevent chaos. And frankly, that’s how you show respect.

Trust + Access = Real Partnership

Toyota doesn’t pull everything in-house just because they can. They choose vendors who are capable and they empower them. Then, they work alongside those vendors to maintain quality and stability.

And here’s the part I love: when a vendor messes up and sends a defective part, they don’t get penalized. They just enter a 100% inspection cycle for four months. It’s not punishment, it’s prevention. That’s how you keep the system running without shutting everything down.

I immediately called Nico at LeanBuilt and said, “Hey, let’s make sure our contracts have this baked in.” Because if you’re a trade partner working with LeanBuilt, you’re also agreeing to an open door policy. We’re going to be on your job, at your shop, supporting you because we’re on the same team.

The Myth of Micromanagement

I’ve talked before about the myth of micromanaging. This isn’t that.

This is about helping. Observing. Supporting.

The best trade partners I’ve ever worked with welcomed me into their shops, introduced me to their teams, and showed me their process. That’s what a great relationship looks like.

If you’re a trade partner working with a GC, and that GC is worth their salt, they should be visiting. And you should be welcoming them in. That’s just good business and it’s how we elevate the entire experience.

Key Takeaway:

An open door policy between general contractors and trade partners isn’t about control, it’s about collaboration, quality, and shared responsibility. If we want great projects, we need to show up early, stay connected, and lead together.

Final Thought:
Don’t wait for problems to show up onsite. Visit your trade partners. Walk their shops. Talk to their foremen. Be present early, because once the work starts, it’s too late to “hope” it goes well. We don’t need to micromanage, we need to connect.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Syncing the project and personal plans

Posted on December 2, 2025December 2, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 6 min

Syncing the project and personal plans

Welcome, everyone. In this blog, I want to talk about something we often overlook in construction leadership: how critical it is to align your personal schedule with the overall project plan, especially when it comes to field leadership and logistics.

Why Personal Schedules Matter in Construction

We talk a lot about logistics and flow about getting the right materials, kits, and equipment to the right place at the right time. But here’s the thing: all that planning is useless if the people meant to support that work aren’t showing up at the right time either.

In the old days, people would casually say, “I’ll meet you out there in two hours,” and show up four hours later. That doesn’t cut it anymore. Field leaders must time-block their day based on the project’s needs, especially when there are key handoffs happening.

If a trade partner says they’re wrapping up work in Zone 3C at 9 a.m. tomorrow, someone from the project delivery team should already have that in their calendar. If a delivery is queuing at 8 a.m., someone better be assigned to help.

It’s not enough to have a “general” day plan. Every field engineer, assistant superintendent, and project engineer should be walking out of the afternoon foreman huddle with their personal time blocks aligned to the next day’s plan.

Imagine three screens:

Screen one: the day plan and overall schedule.
Screen two: your logistics and zone maps.
Screen three: everyone’s personal schedules.

We may not have a literal third screen, but we must operate like that information is flowing between all three.

Why It Matters

This isn’t just about organization, it’s about field flow.

If your project team isn’t available for critical handoffs, layout coordination, or helping a trade get set up, the work stalls. And when the work stalls, crews stop. When crews stop, you lose rhythm. And when you lose rhythm? You lose the project.

We’ve got to sync human schedules with production plans. Because no matter how well you plan on paper, it’s boots on the ground that make or break the flow.

Key Takeaway:

A project’s success depends not just on a great plan, but on people showing up on time to make that plan happen. Sync your personal schedule to the project schedule every day, every leader.

Final Thought:

If you’re a field engineer, PE, or assistant super, this one’s for you. Fill out your next days’ time blocks during the foreman huddle. Don’t wait. Don’t guess. Be there when the work needs you.

Because leadership isn’t just about vision, it’s about showing up. Literally.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Popcorn & Variation

Posted on November 28, 2025November 28, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 9 min

Popcorn and Variation, A Real Life Lesson in Lean

Today I want to talk about popcorn and variation, and trust me, this one is worth sticking around for. It ties directly into how we work, how we plan, and how we run projects in construction.

The Importance of Taking Notes

With AI tools and automatic note takers everywhere, people are losing the habit of taking notes. The purpose of taking notes is not just to store information, it is to retain it.

When you hear something valuable, your brain processes it, signals your arm and hand, and you physically write it down. That act reinforces memory. Without it, we forget. We lose reliability. We look unprepared. Always take notes. It helps your brain do its job.

A Message From a Listener

A listener recently wrote me:

“I moved from residential to commercial construction and felt lost. Your blogs help give me daily direction. You are making an impact.”

Messages like this mean a lot to me. If you have questions, send them. I will answer them. None of us are smarter than all of us. We learn together.

Now let me tell you a story that perfectly illustrates how variation destroys flow.

The Popcorn Disaster

The kids and I love going to movies. We usually go to two places. One is fancy with layback seats. The other is our neighborhood spot beside a park. It is not fancy, but those are our people, so that is where we go.

Normally, Kate orders everything in advance in a really lean way. Tickets ready. Popcorn ready. Drinks ready. Zero waste. No chaos. We go in, enjoy the movie, clean up every crumb, and leave the theater spotless. It is a point of pride for me.

But this time, I told Kate not to pre order anything. I figured we would just order when we got there.

That was mistake number one.

We got to the counter and I asked for six medium popcorns. The lady said, “If you do two large popcorns and get the little baskets, it will be cheaper.” I thanked her, but told her I just wanted six mediums.

She insisted. She went through upsell after upsell. Extra-large. Combinations. Free refills. Add ons. I was confused. Trying to be nice. Not wanting to argue. Eventually I caved and ordered three extra-large popcorns.

She only gave me two.

Now everything was already off standard. The popcorn was overflowing. The kids could not carry them. The sizes were wrong. The system was unfamiliar. Habits were broken.

We walked into the theater and instantly everything fell apart.

I tried to pour the giant popcorn into little boxes. I spilled it on the seats, the floor, my kids, even in someone’s hair. The kids dropped their containers. Someone stepped on one. Popcorn went everywhere.

If you looked at us, you would say Jason Schroeder has zero lean cells in his body.

I spent the first 40 minutes hunched over, cleaning, managing spills, and feeling frustrated. I was not even watching the movie. It was chaos.

All because of one thing.

Variation.

Variation Destroys Flow

Here is what happened the moment variation entered our system:

I changed our ticket and food ordering method.
We changed serving sizes.
We moved away from our standard habits.
I stopped speaking up for what we actually needed.
We entered the theater in a batch and waste condition.
My brain no longer saw “clean theater” as achievable.
I got frustrated.
We broke every standard we normally follow.

That is what variation does. It cascades.

Nicholas Modig teaches this clearly. Even small changes in the system create unintended consequences. Everything takes longer. Teams lose reliability. Flow falls apart.

Variation is not just an annoying concept in lean books. It is real. It impacts your outcomes. It impacts your behavior. It impacts your mind.

My popcorn meltdown proved the entire principle in one afternoon.

Why This Matters in Construction

This is exactly what happens on projects:

A trade shows up with different crew sizes.
A shipment arrives late.
A superintendent changes the plan without telling anyone.
Materials show up in different quantities.
Someone tries to “improve” something on the fly.

Suddenly the whole system breaks down, and everyone wonders why flow collapses.

Variation is the killer of consistency, stability, and predictability.

Final Thought

I wanted to share this before I lost the lesson. The popcorn disaster reminded me how fragile our habits are and how quickly variation disrupts everything.

I hope you enjoyed this blog.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Keeping Commitments

Posted on November 28, 2025November 28, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 12 min

Keeping Commitments, A Lean Mindset We Need in Construction

In this blog, I want to talk about a concept that sits at the heart of our success in construction, keeping commitments. If that interests you, stay with me because this one matters more than most people realize.

This blog supports the book I am writing with an incredible group of people, Elevating Construction the Lean Way. The book focuses on simple, individual concepts that train the mind away from push, rush, panic, and disrespect for people. My goal is not for you to finish the book and perfectly implement every tool. My goal is that your thinking changes. If people read it with an open mind and update their mental programming, I believe it will make a big difference.

This blog is about the Japanese mindset of keeping commitments. It is called yakusoku, and it changed the way I look at reliability and trust.

Understanding the Sensitivity Around Japanese Examples

Before I go deeper, let me address something that comes up often. Sometimes people say, Jason will not stop talking about Japan. We are not Japanese. We are not in Japan.

I fully understand that reaction.

Recently, during a training, I mentioned how Kevin and I learned that in Japan they build people before they build things. Someone muttered under their breath, we are not Japanese. I get where that frustration comes from.

But here is the truth. Sharing Japanese concepts is no different than a parent bragging about a child’s accomplishments. It does not mean the parent is offended or intimidated. It is pride. And it is an acknowledgment that someone else is doing something well.

Much of what Japan excels at today came from a blend of their historical culture and teachings introduced after World War II. This is not Japan versus the United States. This is learning from a global partner. So when I reference Japan, treat it like learning from a close friend.

Now let me explain their mindset around commitments, yakusoku.

A Commitment Is a Moral Bond

In Japanese culture, a commitment is not just a task. It is a moral promise. A personal bond of honor.

If you break it, you do not simply inconvenience someone. You create mewaku. You burden them. You place your weight onto their back.

And this is where we need to pause.

Imagine you are a trade partner. Your crew is ready. The energy is high. You are about to start your zone and two workers do not show up. They did not call. They vanished. Now you cannot fulfill what you promised.

How do you feel?

Now flip it. You are a general contractor. You completed your pre con meeting. You built a pull plan with every trade. You have a stable weekly work plan. You have flow. And one trade does not show up. Forty other trade partners are disrupted instantly.

Our culture does not treat commitments seriously enough, and construction pays the price for it every day.

The Four Western Yeses

Chris Voss from the Black Swan Group teaches that in the West we have several versions of yes.

There is a yes that means absolutely not.

There is a yes that means maybe.

There is a yes yes.

And there is a yes under duress that practically means no.

You never really know where you stand.

In Japan, unless you hear a clear yes, the answer is no. They will not make a promise they cannot keep. They avoid burdening somebody else. Their yes is sacred.

Imagine if we adopted that level of clarity.

Breaking Commitments Creates Waste

When we break commitments in construction, we do not just cause inconvenience. We create waste:

Extra work
Overburden
Disruption of flow
Breakdown of trust
Increased litigation
Lost respect

When commitments do not mean anything, handshakes lose value, promises lose power, and relationships weaken.

We can fix this. We can make our commitments mean something again.

A Real Look at Cultural Behavior

Let me share something personal. When I worked on federal projects with Hensel Phelps, I noticed we built a cycle of schools, courthouses, and prisons. I used to joke that we were constructing the hand baskets America was going to hell in. Schools lead to courthouses, courthouses lead to prisons, and prisons eventually lead right back to schools.

Here is the truth. If you want to fix a nation, fix its schools. If you want to improve construction, start with how we teach people. What we model. What we expect.

If kids grow up not cleaning up after themselves, throwing trash for someone else to deal with, showing up late, interrupting class, and never learning responsibility, why would we expect them to become adults who honor commitments on job sites?

We must teach responsibility early. We must model commitment as leaders.

Precision in Time and Honor

In some countries, people show up 45 minutes late and that is considered polite. I once went to a region where I was told, you are lucky they only arrived 45 minutes late.

Japan is the opposite. Their trains depart down to the second. Meetings start exactly on time. Tours and lectures flow in perfect sequence. One minute late is considered a breach of respect.

Commitment is not casual. It is precise.

And if you cannot commit, you say so immediately.

Applying Yakusoku in Construction

Now imagine this.

Every trade partner on your job honors every commitment.

If they say they will show up, they show up.

If they say they will follow a rule, they follow it.

If they say they will complete a zone, they complete it.

If they say they will meet a handoff, they meet it.

And if they run into problems, they communicate early, transparently, and respectfully.

What would that do to flow? To production? To teamwork? To the takt plan?

Let me tell you. It would change everything.

Most interruptions to flow happen because someone broke a commitment. If we fix this one behavior, we fix enormous amounts of waste.

Final Thought

Keeping commitments is not about perfection. It is about respect, clarity, transparency, and teamwork. It is about carrying your own weight and not placing unnecessary burden on others.

If we could adopt even a fraction of the mindset I saw in Japan, our industry would transform.

Thank you for staying with me through this blog.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Hansei: Reflection Before Improvement

Posted on November 28, 2025November 28, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 10 min

Hansei, Reflection before Improvement

Hansei is one of the most powerful concepts I learned in Japan, and I love sharing it because it applies to every single aspect of our work. What I saw firsthand changed how I look at mistakes, systems, and improvement. If you stay with me through this blog, you are going to learn something that can transform your team and your culture.

A Lesson From Japanese Schools

When we visited Japanese schools, I was blown away. The kids were incredibly polite. I remember a moment that still sticks with me. I was standing at the back of the classroom and a small boy quietly stepped in front of me. He just looked up at me politely. He did not know English and I did not know what he needed. Then I realized I was standing in his way. I moved, he put his lunch pail away, and he quietly said thank you.

Their manners, habits, and routines are remarkable.

The students serve each other lunch. They wear little hats and masks, fill each other’s plates, and wait until everyone is served. Anyone with leftover untouched food returns it so none is wasted. After eating, they 5S their desks and clean the school together. There is no complaining. The parents join in too. It is joyful. It is disciplined. It is beautiful.

One of the first things Japanese kids learn early on is Hansei. Reflection.

Understanding Hansei

On our tour, Mommy san explained it this way. She said, “It is not simply reflection. It is acknowledging, this was wrong. I did this wrong.” But they do not judge the person. They judge the action.

In the United States, our first instinct is to get defensive. We think any criticism means something is wrong with us as humans. We feel attacked. We avoid accountability.

The Japanese separate the action from the human being. They say the behavior was wrong, the process was wrong, the system was wrong, the environment prompted the wrong decision. They never say the person is wrong.

I even heard a child explain how going back to get his hat during cleaning was a process problem. He said next time he would adjust the process and go straight to his chores. That is hansei in action.

Westerners often claim Japanese culture is a shame culture. I did not experience that at all. What I saw was support. Togetherness. Accountability without blame.

Where Hansei Shows Up in Lean and Construction

Paul Ackers, who is one of the top lean practitioners on the planet, practices hansei constantly. He will say forty-five times a day, “I did that wrong. That behavior was not accurate. I apologize. Here is what I will do now.”

It is not self-shaming. It is extreme ownership. He loves it because he knows that each reflection lifts a burden off the people around him.

In construction, we desperately need this. In Western cultures we throw people away. We blame the individual instead of the environment, the system, the circumstance, or the wiring of the human brain.

We say things like, “They brought it on themselves,” or “That person is just bad.” And when we do this, we miss the root cause. We miss the solution. We lose the chance to grow.

Seeing People As Good and Systems As the Problem

Here is what I believe. Human beings are inherently good. Even the worst actions have root causes in systems, environments, trauma, culture, or genetics. If we could stop blaming the person and start examining the system, we would see the truth.

When we do that, two things happen.

We stop throwing people away.

We finally get to solve the real problem.

If we want a better society, a better company, a better project team, we must stop attacking people and start improving systems.

Hansei in Daily Work

When I look at how this fits into construction, it becomes clear.

In companies, we identify, discuss, and solve problems. That is hansei.

In departments, we surface issues instead of hiding them.

On projects, we encourage trade partners to speak up instead of shutting down the most vocal ones.

With crews, after they finish a zone, we reflect. I will ask, “What could we do better? Was the generator in the wrong spot? Do we need a different ladder?”

This simple practice changes everything.

A Daily Challenge for Leaders

Paul gave me a challenge that I now pass on to you. As part of your daily leader standard work, can you say three things consistently?

Your idea is better than mine.

That behavior was wrong. I am sorry. Here is what I will do next time.

Let us bring all problems to the surface.

Hansei builds a culture of transparency, safety, accountability, and improvement. It is how we move forward. It is how we get traction. It is how we grow.

Key Concept

We do not blame people. We improve the process. We examine the system. We adjust the behavior. That is how societies evolve. That is how companies improve. That is how humans become better together.

I truly believe the Japanese have figured out Humanity 2.0. And we can learn so much from them.

I hope you have enjoyed this blog.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Nemawashi: Building Consensus Before Taking Action

Posted on November 27, 2025November 27, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 10 min

Nemawashi: Building Consensus before Taking Action

Nemawashi is one of my absolute favorite concepts to teach because it directly impacts everything we do in construction today. When I learned how to apply it, it completely changed the way I led teams, planned projects, and built environments. My goal in this blog is to show you exactly how to use it so you can experience the same transformation.

Why I Look to Japanese Construction

Whenever I bring up Japanese concepts people sometimes worry about the words. I am not doing that to make things complicated. I am doing it to flip a switch in our brains. Japan consistently delivers construction projects with fewer incidents and faster timelines, even though they have just as much bureaucracy as we do.

They are a free market, just like us. They simply work together better.

I want to rise to that level. I want to play with the big dogs. I refuse to say they are better and I am out. I say I am in. Let me learn. Let me grow. Let me lead better.

That is why I embrace concepts like Nemawashi.

Why Lean Systems Need People

Last Planner, Takt, and Kanban all depend on human interaction. They are fragile systems, meaning they only work when people participate. That is exactly why they produce remarkable results.

CPM on the other hand is anti-fragile. Anyone can pick it up, throw it into a contract, do it poorly, get no results, and everyone shrugs because no one ever expected it to work. No human involvement needed.

If you want easy you choose CPM. If you want results you choose systems that require people. You choose engagement. You choose consensus.

That is where Nemawashi comes in.

What We Must Stop Doing

I have to say this straight. Command and control leadership is dead. Telling trades what to do and shoving schedules down their throat is gone. Superintendents who build plans alone and force them on teams with no collaboration are not leading. They are guessing. They are creating chaos.

Another mindset that needs to go is the idea that the superintendent can run the job however he or she wants. No. The superintendent must run the job according to the company’s operating system. That is leadership.

We have been too cowboy in the United States. Too proud to be ignorant. Too quick to dismiss collaboration. Too quick to say I do not need Japan I do not need pull plans I do not need Takt.

If we want to compete with the best in the world we have to rise above that.

Learning vs Staying Stuck

I have worked with old dog learners and old dog fixed mindsets.

Old dog learners are amazing. They have decades of experience and still stay curious.

Old dog fixed mindsets say I do not need look ahead I do not need pull plans I do not need input from trades. They cling to command and control because it is what they know.

But here is the science. When you tell someone to do something hard without including them, their brain releases cortisol. Disconnection. Stress. Resistance.

When people weigh in and buy in, even if the task is difficult, their brain releases cortisol and oxytocin together. Oxytocin is the connection hormone. It builds trust and motivation. Stress turns into eustress. The team rises instead of resists.

That is what Nemawashi unlocks.

Why Buy In Is Everything

I say this all the time. When trades help you make the plan, they will fiercely defend and execute the plan.

I see this in every successful project. I see it in every high performing superintendent. Consensus creates ownership. Ownership creates results.

Even if you are skeptical, even if you are used to running the show alone, at least understand this one truth. You cannot lead without buy in.

How I Practice Nemawashi

In companies I use catchball. Leaders send ideas back and forth. Strategy becomes shared instead of imposed.

In departments I pull teams into direction setting.

On projects I involve stakeholders in defining goals.

With trade partners I build milestones, pull plans, and look ahead, weekly work plans, and daily plans together.

With workers I ask what they want improved.

I do not run a democracy. I lead. But I lead after listening. People weigh in so they can buy in. Then I make decisions with alignment and clarity.

That is Nemawashi.

The Analogy I Love Most

Nemawashi literally means preparing the roots of the tree before planting. When superintendents build schedules in a silo they try to grow trees with no roots. One storm and everything collapses.

When I do Nemawashi, I prepare the roots. I build a foundation. The team stabilizes. The work flows. The results show up.

Consensus is planting deep roots before the tree grows.

The One Question I Leave You With

What planning, direction, or decision can you start creating with your team in consensus instead of doing it alone in a silo?

If you shift even one process toward Nemawashi, everything begins to change.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Aizuchi: The Japanese Art of Listening and Presence

Posted on November 26, 2025November 26, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 7 min

Aizuchi, The Japanese Art of Listening and Presence in Construction

In this blog, I want to share a game-changing concept that can transform the way superintendents and project managers communicate with trade partners. The technique is called Aizuchi, and it comes straight from the heart of Japanese culture. I absolutely love this concept, and I’m excited to explain why it matters so deeply for construction teams.

What Japan Taught Me About Presence

One of the most fascinating things I observed in Japan was how people interact. Their presence is unbelievable. I’ll never forget how our co-host, Mommy-san, would keep waving until the bus was completely out of sight. That wasn’t politeness. That was presence. Full attention, full energy.

And honestly, it showed me two big gaps we have in construction.

Two Habits We Must Stop in Construction:

Executives who don’t listen.
You’ve seen it. They rush the conversation. They cut people off. They dismiss information. This destroys communication.
Supers and PMs talking over trade partners.
We often aren’t truly hearing what trades are trying to say. We’re filtering information through hurry, ego, or distraction.

In Japan, even when someone wasn’t making direct eye contact, they were fully focused, nodding, responding, and anchoring their attention to the speaker. In the U.S., we’re distracted, multitasking, batching, and scattered.

What Aizuchi Really Means

Aizuchi literally means listening with a hammer, listening with a beat, keeping the mind anchored, responding rhythmically, making small sounds of acknowledgment.

It is the practice of:

Being fully present.
Actively listening.
Responding in real-time.
Staying in one-piece flow.

When we adopt this, we stop filtering, stop rushing, and start understanding what people actually mean, not just what they say through ego or stress.

Presence Is Lean

Any leader who says, “I’m too busy to be present,” is actually overcommitted and working in a non-lean way.

True lean leadership requires:

Showing respect.
Being fully attentive.
Understanding before responding.
Operating in one-piece flow.

Paul Akers exemplifies this. He gets hundreds of messages a day, runs multiple companies, but when he’s with you, he’s with you. Fully present.

How to Practice Aizuchi as a Leader

Here are practical steps you can apply on your jobsites immediately.

Prepare yourself before talking to someone:

Remember their name. Say it three times within a minute. Show respect. Be intentional.

Give full presence:

No phones. No distractions. One activity frame at a time.

Actively listen:

Use simple acknowledgments. Nod. Repeat back key points. Anchor your mind to what they’re saying.

Respond with intelligence, not pressure

Instead of forcing, pushing, or shortening durations in a pull plan, pause and offer solutions.

For example, instead of “You have to do this,” try,
“Okay, I hear you. Can we rezone? Add a second crew? Change equipment? Prefab the bottleneck?”

This is where intelligence replaces overbearing leadership.

Why Listening Is the Hidden Superpower

Almost all breakdowns on projects come from not using the genius of the team.

And what is the number one thing preventing us from using that genius?

We don’t listen.

Without listening:

People shut down.
Communication breaks.
Problems hide.
Solutions never surface.
Flow collapses.

Presence unlocks the team’s intelligence and removes massive waste.

Aizuchi on the Jobsite, Every Day

In Super PM Bootcamp, I teach activity frames.
Start a task, do the task, finish the task, then move on.

But crews rush. They half-listen. They silo themselves. They push before understanding.

Aizuchi flips that.

It teaches:

Listen.
Absorb.
Respond.
Then act.
With full attention.

This is the foundation of Reflect, Plan, Build, Finish the Takt rhythm.

Your Challenge

Aizuchi is not just politeness. It is not cultural flair. It is a skill and a discipline that will radically improve communication and eliminate the waste of ignoring team genius.

How can you be more present, truly listen, and replace pushing with intelligence in your daily interactions?

The answer to that will change your leadership forever.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

We Don’t Blame People

Posted on November 25, 2025November 25, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 9 min

We Don’t Blame People

Welcome everybody and welcome to this blog. In this blog, I want to talk about a topic that completely changes the way we lead, the way we solve problems, and the way we build healthy project cultures. The topic is simple: why we do not blame people. If you care about developing high-performing teams, achieving flow, and improving your environment, stay with us in this blog.

The Struggle With the Concept of Blame

The idea of not blaming people can feel confusing. When I first heard the lean principle that we do not blame the person, we blame the process, my mind immediately went to the extreme examples. What about truly evil acts in history? What about people who do horrible things? Doesn’t accountability matter?

For a long time I wrestled with that tension. But over years of study, reflection, and experience, the concept became clearer. With influence from authors like Eckhart Tolle and Byron Katie, and from understanding evolutionary psychology and human behavior, the pieces finally connected.

Understanding the True Self Versus the Ego

Here is the core insight. When we say we do not blame people, we do not blame their true selves. Their core self, soul, conscience, or present self, depending on your worldview.

Whether you believe in a divine creator or purely evolutionary biology, the reality is the same. Human beings are born into environments shaped by genetic wiring, mutation, natural selection, and survival instincts. Our bodies and brains are survival machines, always scanning for threat, always reacting, always protecting.

Eckhart Tolle calls that part of us the ego. The ego lives in fear, in the past, in the future. It lashes out, hides, fights, and defends. It is driven by survival.

Our true self is something different. It is conscious. It can override instinct. It can choose.

So when someone behaves poorly, what are we really seeing? Their true self? Or something else? That question changes everything.

The Forces That Shape Human Behavior

Once I walked this thinking all the way through, across science and philosophy and real human examples, I realized something powerful.

The reason we do not blame people is because behavior comes from many forces that are not their true self. These forces include:

System.
Process.
Environment.
Culture.
Learned and prompted behavior.
Genetic wiring.

Any one of these can override a person’s intentions. All of them together create the conditions for success or failure. When we focus on the person instead of the conditions, we fail to solve the real problem.

Prompted Behavior and Learned Patterns

Think of prompted behavior. If someone was raised from birth to believe violence was noble, or that another group is the enemy, would they ever have a fair chance to choose differently? Our brains work like AI systems. The prompting determines the output. When the input is broken, the behavior will be broken.

Genetic Wiring and Human Limits

Think of genetic wiring. Sociopathy, neurodivergence, trauma responses, chemical imbalances, neurological differences. Nobody blames a child born with Down syndrome for the way they interact with the world. Nobody blames a person with a missing limb for not completing a physical task. Yet we often blame someone whose brain wiring is different, even when that wiring was not their choice.

This does not mean dangerous people should be free or without accountability. Prisons and mental hospitals exist for a reason, and public safety matters. What it means is that our approach should be rooted in problem-solving, not condemnation. When we understand the cause, we can work toward a cure for future generations.

What Changes When We Stop Blaming People

When we stop blaming people and start addressing root causes, extraordinary things start to happen.

Teams stop attacking each other and start attacking problems.
Conflict turns into collaboration.
People feel safe to speak up.
High performance becomes possible.
Respect for people becomes a lived reality, not a slogan.

Lean Thinking Requires Respect for People

Lean thinking is built on this foundation. The Japanese culture that birthed lean holds a deep belief in the inherent value of every human being. Not that every behavior is good, but that every person contains a true self-worth honoring.

If we want to be true lean thinkers, this is where we must go. We do not blame the person. We find the system issues, the process issues, the environment, the culture, the prompts, the wiring, and we fix the root cause.

That is how we elevate people. That is how we elevate construction. And that is how we elevate the world.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Kaizen and Kaikaku: Continuous vs Radical Improvement

Posted on November 25, 2025November 25, 2025 by Jason Schroeder

Read 9 min

Kaizen and Kaikaku: Continuous vs Radical Improvement

In this blog, I want to talk about the heart of Kaizen and how Kaizen and Kaikaku apply directly to construction. These concepts are foundational to creating high-performing teams, stable systems, and long-term improvement.

If you are interested in learning the difference between continuous improvement and radical improvement, stay with me.

What is Kaizen

Kaizen means “to make better.” It is continuous improvement. In the United States, it was often taught as a one-, two-, or three-day workshop, which created a misconception that Kaizen only happens in meetings.

That is not true.

There are two major types of Kaizen:

Spot Kaizen.
System or process Kaizen.

Spot Kaizen can happen on the spot, boots on the ground, when someone simply sees something that bugs them and decides to fix it. It can be small, simple, and immediate.

System or process Kaizen is broader. It looks at how a part of the process affects the whole. That is why Taiichi Ohno would ask, “How does this improvement apply to the entire process?”

Kaizen is not just improvement. As the Japanese taught it to me, Kaizen is:

Love of the customer.
Pride in the work.
Acknowledgment of the employees.

If the people on the ground are not acknowledged, the soil is too hard for improvement to take root. Kaizen is the water and fertilizer that prepares the ground.

Spot vs System Kaizen

Spot Kaizen is:

Fix what bugs you.
Small, simple improvements made immediately.

System Kaizen is:

Improvements that affect the entire flow.
Improvements at the bottleneck, not outside it.

Paul Akers said it well
“There is nothing so wasteful as improving something that should not exist at all.”

Eliyahu Goldratt and his family have reinforced this for years. If your bottleneck is in one location, improving something outside of that zone does not improve the system. It distracts from what actually matters.

An analogy: Seeds, soil, and growth

Mr. Yabe from TESSEI gave us a powerful analogy:

TPS and Lean are the seeds.
The people and the company are the ground.
Kaizen is the water and fertilizer.

If the soil is hard, meaning people are not acknowledged, you cannot grow Lean, TPS, or any meaningful improvement. Acknowledge people first. Improve systems second.

What is Kaikaku

Kaikaku is radical improvement. Big changes. System-level transformations.

Kaikaku looks like:

Switching out a major piece of equipment.
Restructuring an entire sequence.
Implementing a new system.
Opening a new facility.
Adopting a new software platform.

Think of Kaikaku as the vertical leap. Kaizen is the steady upward slope.

System implementation vs continuous improvement

Let’s compare different systems on a scale of 0 to 10 for effectiveness and then look at their trajectory.

Examples:

The Last Planner System might be a 6, but has stayed stagnant.
CPM might be a 1 and has gotten worse due to abusive behavior.
The Takt Production System might be an 8, and it keeps climbing.

Toyota may have started around a 6, but continuous improvement pushed it upward for decades.

You must understand two things

The effectiveness of your system
The trajectory of your system

A system with upward trajectory beats a stagnant or declining one, even if it starts lower.

Free-market analogy

Consider this analogy:

US free-market capitalism may be a 60, but trending downward.
Communism may be a 1, also trending downward.
Japanese free-market capitalism may be a 62, but trending upward because of how the government manages the system.

Trajectory matters just as much as the starting point.

How Kaizen and Kaikaku apply in construction

This always comes back to the question
“Jason, should we implement fast or slow?”

The answer:

If your system is not at its minimum functioning level, implement fast. That is Kaikaku.
Once the baseline is in place, move to steady, people-friendly Kaizen.

Example:

If I walk onto a job that has no Last Planner System, no Takt Production System, and no morning worker huddles, I am not going to tiptoe. I am going to implement morning huddles immediately. We might fail for a couple of weeks, but that radical improvement gets the system to a functioning baseline.

After that, we move into gentle, steady Kaizen improvements.

In Japan, this is normal. The average employee submits 50 – 100 improvement ideas per year. In the US, the average is one to five. We have a lot of room to grow.

Kaizen and Kaikaku together

You need both:

Kaikaku to launch the system.
Kaizen to elevate the system.

Continuous improvement keeps the trajectory upward. Radical improvements reset the baseline when needed.

A question for you

Is your system at its minimal functioning composition?
Are there any radical improvements you need to make?
And once the base is in place, are you improving upward?

These questions shape the future of your project, your team, and your company.

I hope you have enjoyed this blog.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

General Offerings

Company Offerings

Systems

SUBSCRIBE NOW !

Subscribe to our newsletters and stay updated!

Related Books

The First Planner System: The Project Planning System for Executives, Project Managers, and Superintendents in Pre-construction - Book 2

Pull Planning For Builders: How to Pull Plan Right, Respect People, and Gain Time (The Art of the Builder)

The Ten Improvements to Production Planning: What Lean Builders Can Do To Improve Short Interval Planning (The Art of the Builder)

Related Books

The First Planner System: The Project Planning System for Executives, Project Managers, and Superintendents in Pre-construction - Book 2

Built to Fail: Why Construction Projects Take So Long, Cost Too Much, And How to Fix It

Related Books

The First Planner System: The Project Planning System for Executives, Project Managers, and Superintendents in Pre-construction - Book 2

The 10 Myths of CPM: How The Critical Path Method Systematizes Disrespect for People

Calumet "K"

faq

General Training Overview

Superintendent / PM Boot Camp

Takt Production System® Virtual Training

Onsite Takt Simulation

Foreman & Field Engineer Training

Testimonials

Testimonials

agenda

Day 1

Foundations & Macro Planning

day2

Norm Planning & Flow Optimization

day3

Advanced Tools & Comparisons

day4

Buffers, Controls & Finalization

day5

Control Systems & Presentations

faq

UNDERSTANDING THE TRAINING

VALUE AND RESULTS

PLANNING AND SCHEDULING TOPICS

APPLICATION & TEAM ADOPTION

VIRTUAL FORMAT & ACCESSIBILITY

faq

GENERAL FAQS

CURRICULUM & OUTCOMES

LOGISTICS & FORMAT

PRICING & VALUE

SEO-BASED / HIGH-INTENT SEARCH QUESTIONS