Uncategorized Archives - Elevate Constructionist

Physical Intimacy in Marriage

Posted on January 30, 2026January 30, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 14 min

Why Intimacy in Construction Matters

When it comes to building strong foundations in construction, most of us focus on the physical elements of a project the structure, the materials, the systems. But what happens when the relationships that hold us together start to crumble? As we know, construction can be tough on our personal lives, especially for new couples navigating the stressful environment of the field.

The reality is, just as we carefully build and protect the physical integrity of a structure, we must also work to nurture and fortify our relationships. And intimacy, an often overlooked but vital aspect of marriage, plays a critical role in this process. In this blog, we’re going to dig into the power of communication, vulnerability, and meeting each other’s needs to make sure your relationship is just as strong as the buildings you’re constructing.

The Struggles of Balancing Work and Marriage

As a contractor, you’re probably used to working long hours, meeting tough deadlines, and putting out fires left and right. But when you’re constantly caught up in the whirlwind of construction, it’s easy to forget about the emotional foundations of your home life. And while you’re navigating these challenges, it’s not uncommon for intimacy to become a point of conflict.

In the industry, many couples, especially new ones, argue about finances, household chores, and yes, sex. These are common struggles, and often, the lack of physical connection and intimacy can take a toll on both partners. That’s exactly why I’m bringing this conversation to light – to help couples like you figure out how to solve these issues before they turn into unmanageable problems.

Ignoring the Need for Open Communication

One thing I’ve learned over the years is that failure to address intimacy can lead to resentment, frustration, and isolation both in the field and at home. The common mistake that many couples make is assuming that things will improve on their own, or that their partner should just understand their needs without explicit communication.

I’ve worked with couples who’ve been in construction for years and still find themselves stuck in this cycle of frustration. It doesn’t have to be this way, though. The key to overcoming these challenges is communication sitting down, sharing your needs, and being open about what’s not working. It’s not about fixing each other, it’s about understanding and supporting one another.

A Lesson in Vulnerability

Here’s a story I’ll share with you one that has stuck with me since my early days in the field. A friend of mine, who had been working in the industry for years, told me something that changed my perspective entirely. He and his wife had a great relationship, but he admitted that it wasn’t always smooth sailing when it came to physical intimacy.

His perspective was different. He didn’t see intimacy as a challenge to overcome, but rather as an expression of their love and connection. It wasn’t until he opened up to me about how they approached their relationship that I realized how much we, as construction professionals, tend to neglect this part of our lives.

As a construction manager, I was always hyper-focused on the tasks at hand. But hearing this friend talk about his relationship in a healthy, vulnerable way showed me the importance of making space for these crucial conversations. His relationship was built on respect, mutual understanding, and intentional effort. It wasn’t about perfection, but about making time and room for each other. That’s a practice we can all adopt in our lives and marriages.

How to Improve Intimacy and Collaboration

If your relationship is struggling with intimacy or connection, here are a few strategies to help you build a stronger, more meaningful partnership both at home and in your marriage.

Schedule Time for Connection
One thing that Katie and I have found incredibly helpful in our own relationship is setting aside time to truly connect. It sounds simple, but consistency is key. Whether it’s a date night or setting aside specific time to talk about your needs, you have to make space for each other. Scheduling intimacy might feel forced at first, but it’s important to remember that this is an intentional effort to nurture your bond. You might be surprised at how much more fulfilling it becomes when you’re both committed to making it work.
Be Honest About Your Needs
Just like we train our field teams to communicate openly, it’s essential to communicate honestly with your spouse. Let them know what you need whether it’s physical affection, more quality time together, or support in other areas. Communication is the foundation of intimacy, and being upfront about your needs allows both of you to work towards a solution.
The Power of Love Languages
Understanding each other’s love language can work wonders in your marriage. Whether you’re speaking the language of physical touch, words of affirmation, acts of service, or something else, knowing how to express your love in a way that your partner understands is crucial. This wasn’t easy for us at first, but once Katie and I got clear on our love languages, we were able to meet each other’s needs more effectively.
Intimacy Is Not Just Physical
Intimacy extends beyond just physical connection. It includes emotional, mental, and even spiritual connections. Katie and I found that when we took time to check in emotionally and communicate openly about our feelings, we were more connected. Physical intimacy flourished when these other areas were nurtured.

Moving Forward with Purpose

Intimacy in your relationship is something you need to protect and prioritize. And as with any project you take on in construction, it requires consistent effort, time, and resources. It’s about building a strong, durable foundation that can withstand the storms of life. If you’re struggling with your relationship or intimacy issues, it’s time to take action and tackle them head-on.

Elevate Construction can help you and your partner navigate the complexities of balancing work, marriage, and life. With superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, we can help you build stability, alignment, and flow – not just on your job sites, but in your personal lives as well.

Building Strong Foundations

I challenge you to approach your relationships with the same care and intention that you would a construction project. Lay a solid foundation, create a plan, and communicate openly with your partner. Don’t let the issues that come up fester or undermine your marriage. Fix what bugs you, communicate honestly, and build intimacy and connection that lasts.

As Deming once said, “The result of long-term relationships is better than short-term successes.”

FAQ

How can I improve communication in my marriage?
Improving communication starts with honest conversations. Be intentional about scheduling time to talk about your feelings, needs, and concerns. Active listening and understanding your partner’s perspective are also key to effective communication.
How do I balance work and intimacy?
Balancing work and intimacy requires intentional effort. Schedule time for your relationship, and ensure both partners are clear on their needs. Consistency and communication will allow you to maintain a healthy work-life balance.
What if my partner and I have different love languages?
If you and your partner have different love languages, it’s important to understand and respect each other’s needs. Learn each other’s languages and make a conscious effort to show love in ways that resonate with your partner.
How can I make my relationship a priority amidst my busy work schedule?
To make your relationship a priority, set aside specific time for your partner, whether it’s a weekly date night or regular check-ins. Be intentional with your time and ensure both you and your partner feel valued and heard.
What role does emotional intimacy play in physical intimacy?
Emotional intimacy is crucial for physical intimacy. Building trust, sharing vulnerabilities, and maintaining an open emotional connection will naturally strengthen physical intimacy in a relationship.

If you want to learn more we have:

-Takt Virtual Training: (Click here)
-Check out our Youtube channel for more info: (Click here)
-Listen to the Elevate Construction podcast: (Click here)
-Check out our training programs and certifications: (Click here)
-The Takt Book: (Click here)

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

Meet Jason Schroeder, the driving force behind Elevate Construction IST. As the company’s owner and principal consultant, he’s dedicated to taking construction to new heights. With a wealth of industry experience, he’s crafted the Field Engineer Boot Camp and Superintendent Boot Camp – intensive training programs engineered to cultivate top-tier leaders capable of steering their teams towards success. Jason’s vision? To expand his training initiatives across the nation, empowering construction firms to soar to unprecedented levels of excellence.

On we go

Taking Care of Your Shoulders Feat. Dr. Grennan

Posted on January 30, 2026January 30, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 16 min

Why Construction Leaders Need to Focus on Team Health and Preventive Care

In the world of construction, the physical demands on workers are immense. From heavy lifting and repetitive movements to constant exposure to the elements, the toll it takes on the body is undeniable. As leaders in construction, it’s our responsibility to not only ensure the project is progressing but also to make sure the people executing the work are physically prepared for the challenges ahead. This is where the concept of respecting the body and ensuring health and wellness through lean culture practices can make a world of difference.

One of the most pivotal realizations I’ve had in my career is that construction workers, including superintendents, foremen, and the entire project team, often overlook one crucial factor: their health. It’s easy to get caught up in the hustle and bustle of running a project and forget to take care of the one asset that drives everything the human body.

The Pain Construction Workers Face Every Day

Every day on a construction site, workers are subjected to strains, sprains, and repetitive motions that eventually lead to chronic pain or injuries. As a field leader, I’ve seen it firsthand. The problem isn’t just the hard work it’s the lack of preparation and recovery. If you’re a superintendent, you might feel like your team isn’t fully engaged or that certain members are just putting in their hours without any passion. What’s happening isn’t apathy it’s burnout. And that can be fixed.

I remember being on a large construction project, facing tight deadlines, and dealing with what felt like endless problems. We were pushing hard to get the work done, but I noticed that the team’s energy was waning. The trades were performing well enough, but I realized something was missing—nobody was taking care of themselves. I knew we were doing a great job on the project, but we weren’t paying attention to the most important asset: our people.

You see, when workers feel discomfort in their bodies, it affects their performance. Shoulder issues, back pain, repetitive stress, and even mental fatigue from the physical strain of their work begin to pile up. And while the construction industry is often seen as tough, the truth is that physical well-being is often ignored until it’s too late.

The Power of Lean Culture in Body Care

Lean culture in construction isn’t just about schedules and process improvement. It’s about respecting people, stabilizing their work environment, and continuously improving their physical and mental well-being. The concept of “fixing what bugs us” is a core principle that extends beyond operational inefficiencies it applies directly to how we treat our workers’ health.

When I say “fix what bugs us,” I’m referring to identifying the issues that are holding people back physically, whether it’s poor posture, improper lifting techniques, or simply not recognizing the signs of physical strain. The best part? Addressing these issues early can prevent long-term injury and, ultimately, save your project and team from costly setbacks.

A Personal Experience: Recognizing and Fixing Shoulder Pain

Let me take you back to a personal story. A few years ago, I began to experience shoulder pain. At first, it was just a slight discomfort, something I thought would go away with rest. But it didn’t. Over time, it started to affect my ability to perform on the job, making even simple tasks difficult. My shoulders were sore from years of improper posture standing at my desk, lifting materials, and carrying heavy loads the wrong way.

I finally realized I was dealing with “cell phonitis,” a condition that many of us experience today hunching over our phones and computers, causing strain on our shoulders and necks. The pain wasn’t coming from the task I was performing at the moment, but from years of neglecting my body’s needs.

This is a critical lesson that can apply to your team. Just like me, they are likely pushing through discomfort, not realizing that they are slowly setting themselves up for chronic injuries. Whether it’s repetitive lifting, holding materials in awkward positions, or even long hours of working with improper posture these seemingly small things add up over time.

The Importance of Preventive Care and Stretching

The solution lies in preventive care. While some construction companies have begun to integrate ergonomic desk setups or stand-up desks, many workers are still battling long days of lifting, bending, and straining without proper preparation or recovery strategies. This is where programs like BioHealth Management come into play.

Here’s why this matters: Imagine if your workers could prepare their bodies for the workday and recover after it. What if you could integrate daily stretching and preventative care routines into your team’s schedule? How would that affect their overall productivity, safety, and well-being?

Here’s an easy approach to get started:

Stretching: Encourage your team to stretch before starting their shift. This could be as simple as stretching the shoulders, hamstrings, and back to alleviate the tension that comes from standing or sitting for long periods.
Recovery: After a long day, recovery is key. Stretching again at the end of the day, along with using products like absorbent mats for standing or ergonomic accessories, can reduce muscle strain and stiffness.

But it doesn’t stop there. If your workers experience physical strain or injury, a good program should not just focus on the stretch but also on strengthening the opposite muscle groups to keep the body balanced and functioning at its peak.

Fixing What Bugs Us: Why This Should Be Part of Every Job Site Culture

Respect for people is a cornerstone of lean culture, and this should extend to your team’s health. As a leader, it’s crucial that you foster a culture that values both productivity and well-being. This means:

Encouraging and supporting workers to take care of their bodies, not just their tasks.
Implementing systems that allow for rest and recovery without sacrificing productivity.
Offering accessible solutions for stretching, ergonomic equipment, and body care on-site.
Building a culture that promotes health and well-being as a core component of job satisfaction and performance.

These practices not only keep your workers physically healthy but also foster a culture of care, engagement, and productivity. When your team feels supported in their well-being, they are more likely to perform at their best, with fewer injuries, higher job satisfaction, and better results for the project.

Building Healthier, More Productive Work Sites

It’s time for a shift in how we think about our teams in construction. Instead of just focusing on project schedules and costs, we need to focus on our workers as the most important asset. When they are physically healthy, they perform better. It’s that simple. So let’s take the time to fix what bugs us whether that’s the aches and pains from a day of hard work or the breakdown of team health due to poor support systems.

As construction leaders, we have the power to create healthier, safer environments that respect our people’s physical needs. With simple practices like stretching, recovery, and the right ergonomic tools, we can ensure that our teams stay at their best, day in and day out. If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow.

FAQ:

What are some simple stretching exercises for construction workers?
Basic shoulder stretches, back stretches, and hamstring stretches are a great way to relieve tension before and after a shift. Adding shoulder blade activation exercises and simple stretches with a foam roller can also help maintain flexibility and reduce strain.
How can I prevent injury on my construction site?
Investing in preventative care programs, providing ergonomic equipment, and encouraging daily stretching routines can significantly reduce the risk of injury. Training your team on the importance of these practices is essential for long-term success.
How can we create a culture of health on construction sites?
By integrating health and well-being into daily practices, offering education on physical care, and ensuring recovery strategies are in place, you can create a culture that respects the well-being of everyone on-site. Make health a core value of your company culture.
Why is team health important in construction?
Healthy teams perform better. When workers feel physically supported, they are more productive, less likely to suffer from injuries, and have a higher job satisfaction rate, leading to better overall project outcomes.
How does Elevate Construction help with team health and productivity?
Through coaching, leadership development, and practical on-site support, Elevate Construction helps teams implement systems that promote health, well-being, and lean practices, improving overall project success.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

The 7 Lesson School teacher

Posted on January 30, 2026January 30, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 16 min

How to Build a Strong Construction Team Culture: Understanding the Programming Behind the Behavior

If you’ve ever faced resistance when trying to get your team to engage in meetings, participate in planning, or collaborate openly, you’re not alone. The reality is that many of us don’t realize that people aren’t naturally conditioned to excel in these environments. It’s not that they’re bad at their jobs, but rather, they’ve been programmed to survive in systems that don’t encourage collaboration or open communication.

As we push for leaner practices, such as Last Planner, Takt Planning, and healthy conflict resolution, we’re asking our team members to shift their mindset and behavior. Unfortunately, the traditional schooling system, combined with how most organizations operate, often teaches us to conform, stay silent, and avoid conflict. This isn’t something people can just switch off when they walk onto your project site. It’s deep-rooted.

Let me walk you through this, how this programming affects our teams, and how we can create a culture of collaboration, communication, and participation on our projects.

Why Is It So Hard for Teams to Collaborate?

It’s easy to assume that everyone on your team understands the importance of collaboration, participating in meetings, or following systems like Last Planner and Takt Planning. The truth is, they haven’t been programmed to do so. This is where the challenge lies.

As kids, we were taught to conform, memorize, and follow authority figures rather than think critically and act independently. School systems are structured around rules and regulations where individuality is often discouraged. From standardized tests to bells ringing every 45 minutes, students are trained to function within these rigid structures. Over time, this leads to the development of passive behaviors waiting to be told what to do, not questioning authority, and avoiding the discomfort of conflict or ownership.

When this kind of programming spills into the workplace, it can feel like a huge hurdle when you want people to take ownership, collaborate openly, and engage in meaningful problem-solving.

Why Trust Matters in a Lean Culture

I once worked on a project where we were implementing Last Planner and the team was struggling to buy into the system. One of the key players was a seasoned carpenter, an expert at his craft but completely disengaged from the process. He was quiet in meetings, avoided providing feedback, and didn’t engage in our pull planning sessions. He felt out of place in the structured setting of our team huddles and planning sessions.

One day, after a few weeks of pushing him to join the discussions, he finally spoke up. He asked for something something simple, but it showed me that trust had been built. That was the turning point. From that moment, he became one of the most vocal and productive members of our team, contributing roadblocks, insights, and ideas. But it took time. And it took creating a safe environment where he felt his voice was heard.

His initial resistance wasn’t because he didn’t care about the project or the team, it was because the system had trained him to be passive and disconnected from the team’s broader goals.

The moment he felt safe to contribute, he was all in. This is a perfect example of how programming whether it’s from school or prior experiences can affect how people engage in a new work environment, even when that environment is designed for collaboration and efficiency.

Deprogramming the ‘Survival’ Mentality: How to Encourage Full Participation

So how do we get our teams to break out of this passive “survival” mentality? How do we get people to feel safe enough to engage in meetings, speak up during problem-solving, and contribute their ideas?

Create a Safe Environment:
The first step is to build an environment where trust and safety are at the core. People need to know that their opinions matter and that they won’t be penalized for offering feedback. This is the foundation of any collaborative system. It’s important to set clear expectations and consistently reinforce that collaboration is not just encouraged, it’s expected.
Encourage Healthy Conflict:
Contrary to popular belief, healthy conflict isn’t about arguing or creating division. It’s about allowing people to speak their minds, challenge ideas, and discuss problems openly. This is where systems like Last Planner and Takt Planning come into play. They provide the structure for conflict and problem-solving to happen in a productive way. However, people have to be ready and able to engage in this process.
Ask for Their Opinions and Listen:
One of the biggest mistakes we make is assuming that our team members know their role without clearly communicating it. Regularly ask your team for input whether it’s on a plan, a process, or a problem. Don’t just assume that people are on the same page. When they provide feedback, listen actively. This builds trust and reinforces that their contributions are valuable.

Practical Steps for Building a Collaborative Culture

Now that we’ve discussed the challenges, let’s look at how to implement practical solutions that will foster collaboration and participation on your project sites.

Implement Clear Communication Systems:
Regular huddles, brief daily meetings, and consistent check-ins ensure that everyone is aligned and has a chance to speak. Use tools like whiteboards, sticky notes, and collaborative platforms to keep the flow of information open and transparent.
Incorporate Lean Principles:
Lean methodologies like Last Planner and Takt Planning are essential for creating flow and building a culture of collaboration. These systems provide the structure for your team to participate in the planning process, measure progress, and address problems before they become bigger issues.
Invest in Team Building:
Building relationships is key. As I mentioned earlier, people are conditioned not to engage openly, so invest time in team-building activities that help break down barriers and encourage collaboration. Whether it’s through training sessions, boot camps, or simply getting people out of their comfort zones, the more your team feels connected, the more they will contribute to the success of the project.
Reinforce Positive Behavior:
When people step up and engage, make sure to recognize their efforts. Celebrating small wins encourages people to continue participating and showing initiative. This helps create a feedback loop where collaboration and engagement become the norm.

Two Key Principles to Focus On

Fostering Open Communication:
Communication isn’t just about talking; it’s about understanding. Ensure that everyone, from foremen to the office team, has a chance to voice their thoughts and concerns. Hold regular meetings where each team member can share feedback and ask for help. This not only builds trust but creates a system for resolving problems before they escalate.
Prioritize Team Ownership:
Everyone on the project should feel like they own a piece of the work. From the planning to execution, empower your team to take responsibility. The more ownership they feel, the more they will engage and collaborate.

Why Elevate Construction’s Approach to Culture and Collaboration Works

At Elevate Construction, we believe that every successful project starts with the right culture. A culture where trust, respect, and open communication thrive. We’ve seen firsthand how lean principles, proper team-building efforts, and a collaborative mindset can turn any project into a success.

Our mission is simple: To elevate the entire construction experience for workers, leaders, and companies. If you want to build a team that communicates, collaborates, and contributes to a project’s success, you need to foster an environment where everyone feels valued, heard, and respected.

The Power of Human Systems

The reality is that no amount of technical expertise will make up for poor communication, lack of trust, and unhealthy team dynamics. You can have the best project managers, the best trade partners, and the best systems, but if you don’t have a cohesive team working towards the same goal, you’ll never achieve the results you want.

Remember, collaboration doesn’t just happen. It’s something you have to build, nurture, and grow. And it starts with the people.

“If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” – African Proverb

FAQ

Why is team collaboration so difficult in construction?
Team collaboration is challenging because many workers are conditioned not to engage in conflict or provide input. Creating a culture of trust and healthy conflict is key to overcoming this.

How can I get my team to participate in meetings?
Create a safe environment where people feel their opinions matter. Encourage open dialogue and ensure that everyone has the opportunity to speak up and contribute.

What role does Lean play in team collaboration?
Lean principles, such as Last Planner and Takt Planning, provide structured processes that require input from all team members, making collaboration a key part of the planning and execution process.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Training in 2021

Posted on January 30, 2026January 30, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 15 min

The Value of Investing in Yourself: A Game-Changer for Your Career in Construction

In the construction industry, we’re all familiar with the hard-hitting challenges of managing projects, ensuring quality, and maintaining safety on the job site. But there’s one critical aspect that often gets overlooked investing in yourself. If you’re like most professionals in this field, you might focus more on the technical side of the job: schedules, budgets, safety plans, and materials. But here’s the truth: if you’re not investing in sharpening your mind, the rest of it will fall short. Let me break it down for you.

Why You Might Be Missing the Mark

Too many people in construction limit themselves by thinking that technical knowledge and experience alone are the golden keys to success. While those are essential, they’re not enough to help you stay ahead in a constantly changing industry. The real question is: Are you investing in yourself enough to keep evolving?

One thing I see far too often is professionals stuck in the same place, unable to progress in their careers because they’ve neglected personal growth. If you’re stuck in the mindset that “I know what I’m doing; I don’t need more training,” you’re not just missing out on opportunities you’re holding yourself back.

The issue isn’t always your capability. It’s the lack of continual learning. Ignorance is the disease, and training is the cure. The construction industry is constantly evolving, and if you’re not investing in developing your skills, you will quickly find yourself being left behind.

The Misconception About Training: It’s Not Just for the “Weak” or “New”

Many people in construction see training as something for the “rookies” or “underperformers.” It’s a mistake to think that training is for those who are lacking in skills. I can’t stress this enough: training is for everyone. Personal development isn’t just about fixing problems—it’s about growth, sharpening your tools, and staying sharp.

Here’s the reality: I personally spend around $30,000 every year on training. And yes, I have a family to support, 11 kids to be exact. But I prioritize investing in myself because it gives me a return that far outweighs any other expense. That $30,000 goes into everything from leadership courses and coaching to business certifications and personal development. The results have been life-changing for me, and it’s helped me share those lessons with others.

The Importance of Investment

I wasn’t always this focused on continuous development. When I first joined DPR Construction, I was lucky enough to be part of a company that offered a $5,000 training budget each year. That’s where my journey of investing in myself began. Over the years, I’ve gradually increased that amount because I saw the direct benefits it had not just on my career but also on the way I lead projects and teams.

Now, I’m not saying you need to spend $30,000 a year to be successful. But the key takeaway here is that you need to spend something. Whether it’s $500 or $5,000, what you put into learning will return tenfold in terms of success and personal satisfaction. When I first invested in courses like Tony Robbins’ “Unleash the Power Within,” I had no idea how much it would reshape my thinking. But I know for a fact it made me a more effective leader.

Why You Can’t Afford to Ignore Training

Here’s the real kicker: training is more than just about getting ahead. It’s about creating a life that feels fulfilling and purposeful. It’s about being able to show up in your life both professionally and personallyand do it with confidence and competence. The more you learn, the more you’ll enjoy your work, because you’ll feel empowered to take on the challenges that come your way.

Take my advice don’t let the negative voices stop you. We’ve all had that little voice in our head telling us we’re not good enough or that we’re stuck in our career. That voice is wrong. Don’t let it dictate your future. I’ve personally felt that voice creeping in, especially when things weren’t going well. But I learned to shut it down with knowledge and action.

How to Get Started with Investing in Yourself

So now that we’ve covered why investing in yourself is non-negotiable, let’s talk about how you can get started. There are multiple paths you can take to get that return on investment, and I’m going to give you a few practical ways to kick off your training journey.

Pick Training Programs That Matter
The first step is identifying what skills you need to develop. Are you looking to improve your leadership skills? Consider enrolling in courses on coaching or emotional intelligence. Want to sharpen your technical skills? Explore certifications in Lean construction or Last Planner systems.
Commit to Continuous Learning
Investing in yourself isn’t a one-time thing. Commit to spending a portion of your yearly salary on learning and development. If you can afford it, think about dedicating $500-$5,000 annually to build your skills.
Find Mentorship
Surround yourself with those who have been in the field longer than you. Mentors can help you navigate the challenges and provide wisdom that you can’t get from books or courses alone. Ask for help, seek advice, and embrace the power of learning from others.
Use Books and Audiobooks
In addition to formal training, reading is one of the easiest ways to invest in yourself. Books like “This Is Lean” by Niklas Modig and “The Lean Startup” by Eric Ries can transform the way you approach problems in construction.
Utilize Free Resources
There are countless online resources, such as podcasts, webinars, and YouTube videos, that can provide immense value. Stay proactive and keep learning on your own time.

The Personal Investment Equation

At this point, you might be thinking, “I get it, but why does this really matter?” Here’s where the rubber meets the road. When you invest in yourself, you’re creating a competitive advantage for your career and personal growth. You’re equipping yourself with tools and strategies that set you apart from others in the industry.

Here’s why investing in yourself matters so much:

Stay Competitive: Construction is a competitive field. The more you invest in your skills and knowledge, the more valuable you become to your team and company.
Build Confidence: Continuous learning builds confidence. You’ll be ready to tackle problems with more clarity and a bigger toolbox of solutions.
Stay Motivated: Learning keeps you engaged. The moment you stop investing in your growth, your motivation and passion begin to wane.
Increase Earning Potential: The more you know and the more you can do, the more you can command in your salary and job opportunities.

Take Charge of Your Future

I want to leave you with this: You are your best investment. If you’re not investing in yourself, you’re holding yourself back from reaching your full potential. The construction industry is evolving, and to stay relevant, you must evolve with it.

Here’s a quote by Jason Schroeder: “Success is not measured by the number of hours you work but by the value you bring to every task, relationship, and team you touch.”

Now go out and make it happen don’t wait for the perfect moment to start investing in yourself. The perfect moment is now.

FAQ Section

Q1: What is the best way to start investing in myself?
Start by identifying your weaknesses and choosing training or courses that address those areas. Whether it’s leadership skills, technical knowledge, or emotional intelligence, there’s always room for growth.

Q2: How can I afford to invest in myself if my budget is tight?
Investing in yourself doesn’t have to be expensive. You can start with low-cost options like books, audiobooks, or free online resources. Gradually increase your investment as your career progresses.

Q3: How can I find the right mentor?
Look for someone whose career you admire and approach them for advice. Don’t be afraid to ask questions and learn from those who have been in the industry longer than you.

Q4: How can Elevate Construction help with my personal development?
We offer superintendent coaching, project support, and leadership development services that focus on helping you stabilize, schedule, and flow in your construction projects.

Q5: What are the benefits of investing in leadership training?
Leadership training helps you understand your role in the larger picture, improve your communication skills, and develop strategies for leading successful teams. It equips you with the tools to tackle challenges and guide your team effectively.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Take the Owner with You!

Posted on January 30, 2026January 30, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 15 min

The Key to Successful Owner Relationships in Construction

In construction, one of the most critical yet often overlooked aspects of success is effective communication with the owner. This simple truth holds the power to transform projects from standard deliveries to truly exceptional collaborations. Too often, teams shy away from presenting challenges to owners, hoping to handle everything behind the scenes. However, what if I told you that the true secret to gaining your owner’s trust and securing your place as their preferred contractor lies in embracing transparency?

This isn’t just about sending a report at the end of the month or responding to issues only when they’re on the brink of disaster. It’s about bringing your owner along with you on the journey keeping them informed, involved, and most importantly, showing them you’re committed to finding solutions together. In today’s blog, I’m diving into why telling the owner early and often is not just a good practice, but a game-changer for your relationships and your project’s success.

The Owner’s Perspective

Let’s face it owners don’t like surprises. In the construction industry, the most frustrating surprise for any owner is finding out at the last minute that there’s a problem that could impact the project’s schedule, budget, or quality. Whether it’s a procurement delay, an unforeseen issue with a subcontractor, or a design change, owners need to know what’s going on before the problem escalates into a full-blown crisis.

From a builder’s perspective, it’s understandable why this happens. We often try to absorb issues ourselves, hoping to keep the project moving forward without burdening the owner. But the truth is, by hiding problems or delaying communication, we’re only making it worse. When issues inevitably surface, it creates a gap in trust, and that can be much harder to repair than if we had addressed the problem head-on.

Instead of protecting your reputation, hiding problems can lead to questions about your professionalism, and it risks your future business. So, what’s the better approach?

Avoiding the Conversation

Too many construction professionals have fallen into the trap of “keeping things under wraps.” Whether it’s to protect the team, absorb costs, or avoid confrontation, many decide it’s better not to mention problems early. They think, “Let’s fix this before the owner knows,” or “We can handle this internally.”

But this strategy often backfires. When you finally reveal a significant issue, it can feel like a betrayal. The owner is left frustrated, feeling as though they’ve been kept in the dark. And while this might seem like a temporary way to manage things, it erodes the trust that’s crucial to any long-term relationship.

Instead of protecting your reputation, hiding problems can lead to questions about your professionalism, and it risks your future business. So, what’s the better approach?

Owners Are Partners, Not Adversaries

I get it. Being transparent about issues isn’t easy, especially when the outcome might affect the project’s cost or timeline. But here’s the reality: the sooner you address issues with your owner, the sooner you can work together to find solutions. I’m not talking about dumping every little problem on their desk, but when the stakes are high, communication is key.

I’ve had the privilege of working with many owners over the years, and one thing stands out: they appreciate honesty. When we’re upfront about the challenges we’re facing and present them with a clear, actionable plan, they are much more likely to support us. They want to know what’s going on—what we’re doing to resolve it, and how it might impact the overall outcome.

There’s no doubt that transparency fosters trust, and trust is the bedrock of any successful partnership. Trust allows owners to feel confident in the team, even when issues arise.

The Importance of Open Communication

Let me take you back to a personal experience on a project site. We were facing a potential delay due to a procurement issue, and the owner wasn’t aware of it. Instead of brushing it aside, I picked up the phone and called them immediately.

I explained the situation in detail: what the issue was, what we were doing to resolve it, and the possible impacts. I also told them that I would keep them updated as we made progress. Their response? They thanked me for the transparency and even offered some suggestions to help us accelerate the solution.

You see, owners can be incredibly understanding if you bring them into the process early on. They don’t want to be surprised with a large bill or a delay that could’ve been avoided with better communication. In this case, the owner was just as committed to the success of the project as I was. They didn’t see the issue as a setback but as an opportunity to work together to find the best solution.

How to Keep Your Owner in the Loop

If you’re not already doing this, here’s how you can make transparency a regular part of your workflow:

Regular Check-Ins: Schedule frequent updates with the owner to discuss any potential issues. This could be through weekly meetings or bi-weekly calls.
Don’t Wait Until the Last Minute: Address issues as soon as they arise. Don’t wait until they escalate into something bigger.
Present Solutions, Not Just Problems: When you bring up an issue, always have a plan in place. This shows your owner that you’re proactive and in control.
Be Honest About Impacts: If something will affect the timeline or budget, let the owner know early. The earlier they know, the better they can plan.
Own the Outcome: Whether the news is good or bad, take responsibility and let the owner know you have everything under control.

By implementing these simple yet effective practices, you can foster a relationship with your owner built on trust and transparency, which will ultimately lead to smoother projects and a stronger partnership.

How Elevate Construction Can Help

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. Our team of experts can guide you through these communication challenges, helping you build stronger relationships with your owners and avoid surprises.

With the right coaching and support, we can ensure that your project runs efficiently and that you remain in sync with your owner throughout the entire process. Don’t wait for problems to pile up let’s tackle them together, from the beginning.

A Lesson for the Long-Term

As we close, remember this key principle: There’s no such thing as an individual problem in construction only team problems. This mindset will change how you approach challenges on your projects. When everyone is aligned and committed to transparent communication, you’ll find that problems become opportunities for growth and collaboration. You won’t just finish your projects you’ll finish them with the full support and trust of your owners, setting the stage for future successes.

As the great Deming once said, “In God we trust; all others bring data.” In construction, data comes from honest communication, and the sooner you embrace it, the stronger your foundation will be.

FAQs:

Why is transparency with the owner so important in construction projects?
Transparency helps build trust and ensures that the owner is aware of any issues as soon as they arise. It allows for proactive problem-solving and reduces the risk of surprises down the line.
What should I do if a problem arises on my project?
Address it immediately. Be transparent with the owner, present the issue, and offer potential solutions. This shows you are in control and committed to resolving the issue effectively.
How can I ensure I’m communicating effectively with the owner?
Set up regular meetings or check-ins, keep the owner informed of any issues, and always present a plan of action. Honesty and transparency are key to maintaining a strong relationship.
How can Elevate Construction help improve communication on my project?
Elevate Construction offers superintendent coaching, project support, and leadership development, helping your team communicate better, solve problems faster, and build stronger relationships with owners.
What are the benefits of a strong owner-contractor relationship?
A strong relationship leads to smoother project execution, better collaboration, and a more positive work environment. It also increases the likelihood of repeat business and referrals, which is critical for long-term success.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Calumet “K” – Chapter 3 – BONUS

Posted on January 30, 2026January 30, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 18 min

Building a Construction Culture That Thrives: Total Participation in Every Role

In construction, success isn’t just about completing a project on time and under budget. It’s about creating a culture where every team member from project managers to trade partners feels invested in the work. If you’re aiming for lasting results and high-performing teams, the question you need to ask isn’t just, “How do we complete this project?” It’s, “How do we build a culture that empowers everyone to succeed?”

In this blog, we’re going to explore how building a culture of total participation on your construction projects can lead to better outcomes. I’ll show you how a focus on teamwork, clear communication, and respect for each person’s role can transform your projects from ordinary to extraordinary. So let’s dive into why total participation is the cornerstone of success on every construction job.

Disconnect Between Office and Field

When it comes to large-scale construction projects, there’s a pattern that seems to repeat itself over and over again. The office and the field though part of the same team often don’t communicate effectively. Project managers make decisions from behind a desk, while superintendents are out on the job site, left to carry out the plan with little input or collaboration.

In my experience, this disconnect between the office and the field is one of the biggest barriers to creating an efficient and harmonious construction environment. Project managers and superintendents should be working hand-in-hand, but the reality is that often one side feels disconnected from the other.

This lack of alignment leads to frustration, misunderstandings, and ultimately a breakdown in communication that affects the success of the project. Too often, the relationship between the field team and the office is strained, with each group operating in isolation. Without a culture of total participation, these issues fester and lead to inefficiencies that could have easily been avoided.

Focusing on Tasks Over People

Construction teams often think that success comes from working hard and pushing through the work. This is especially true when it comes to superintendents, who are expected to be in control of the job site. But here’s the problem: it’s not about working harder; it’s about working smarter and that requires collaboration.

The failure pattern I see all too often is a focus on tasks rather than people. When leaders focus solely on the technical side of things getting the work done, meeting deadlines, and checking off the boxes they forget the most important aspect of any successful project: the people.

We can’t ignore the human side of construction. Every person on your team has the potential to contribute something valuable, but only if they feel respected, included, and aligned with the team’s goals. If you want to improve project outcomes, you need to shift your focus from task-driven to people-driven leadership. When everyone feels empowered and valued, the results will speak for themselves.

We’ve All Been There

I get it. I’ve been in the field, dealing with last-minute changes, miscommunications, and the pressures of keeping things on track. It’s easy to get caught up in the stress of making sure everything runs smoothly, but let’s be honest when you’re in the trenches, it can feel like you’re working alone. The weight of managing every detail often falls solely on the superintendent, and this creates burnout.

As a superintendent, you’re expected to keep everything on schedule, monitor safety, and coordinate between multiple contractors and trade partners. But if your team isn’t bought into the plan or doesn’t feel like they’re part of the solution, it becomes exhausting. You start to feel like you’re doing the heavy lifting while others sit on the sidelines.

This feeling of isolation is not unique to any one person or job site. Many superintendents and field leaders experience it. But this feeling of isolation can be a thing of the past if we build the right systems and a culture of total participation.

A Short Field Story: The Turning Point

Let me share a quick story that helped shape my approach to leadership. Early in my career, I was tasked with managing a large project where everything that could go wrong, did go wrong. Communication was poor between the field and the office, and team members weren’t taking responsibility for their roles. The project was at risk of missing deadlines, and tensions were high.

I realized that in order for this project to succeed, something had to change. I couldn’t keep pushing the team forward without addressing the root cause of the issues. So, I decided to take a different approach. Instead of managing the team from a place of authority, I started asking questions. I wanted to understand the challenges each team member faced, and I began building a culture of collaboration and respect. I encouraged everyone field workers, foremen, and even trade partners to weigh in on the solutions.

And you know what? It worked. Once the team realized that their opinions mattered and that they had a stake in the success of the project, things started to change. Everyone became more engaged, and we started hitting milestones on time and within budget.

Delivering the Emotional Insight: Empowering the Team

What I learned from this experience is that leadership isn’t just about giving orders; it’s about empowering your team to take ownership. When people are invested in the process when they feel like they have a voice they’ll go above and beyond to make the project a success.

You see, total participation isn’t just a nice idea it’s a necessity. It’s the glue that holds a team together, and it’s what creates the flow that leads to success. When you create a culture where everyone is involved, you foster an environment of accountability, respect, and shared goals. And when everyone on your team shares the same vision, you can accomplish incredible things together.

Building a Culture of Total Participation

So, how do we create a culture of total participation? It starts with clear communication and the willingness to listen to everyone. Here are some steps to get started:

Communication is Key: Make sure communication flows both ways down from leadership and up from the field. Everyone needs to understand the project’s goals, timelines, and expectations. Hold regular team meetings and check-ins to ensure everyone is aligned.
Create an Inclusive Culture: Encourage input from all team members, including subcontractors and trade partners. This not only improves decision-making but also fosters a sense of ownership across the team.
Use Lean Tools: Lean tools like Takt planning and the Last Planner system can help improve project flow and efficiency. These tools are not just about scheduling—they’re about creating a system where everyone on the project site is actively participating in the planning and execution process.
Invest in Training and Development: Whether it’s superintendent coaching, foreman boot camps, or leadership development, make sure your team has the skills and knowledge they need to succeed. When people feel confident in their abilities, they’re more likely to contribute and take ownership.
Set Clear Expectations and Accountability: Everyone on your team needs to understand their role and how their work contributes to the project’s success. Set clear goals and hold everyone accountable for achieving them.

Practical Guidance for Project Success

As you begin to implement these strategies, it’s important to remember that change takes time. You won’t build a culture of total participation overnight. But with consistent effort and a commitment to improving communication and collaboration, you’ll start seeing results.

Encourage your superintendents to communicate openly with their teams. Give them the tools they need to plan and execute their work, and make sure they’re invested in the overall success of the project. Use lean tools to optimize your workflows, and provide regular training and development to ensure your team has the skills to excel.

If your project needs superintendent coaching, project support, or leadership development, Elevate Construction can help your field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. With the right tools, strategies, and mindset, you can create a thriving construction culture that leads to long-term success.

Building a Better Future for Your Team

At the end of the day, success in construction is about more than just completing tasks—it’s about building relationships, creating trust, and empowering your team to succeed. When everyone feels like they’re part of something bigger than themselves, they’re more likely to go above and beyond to make the project a success.

As Jason Schroeder says, “When everyone is involved, when everyone is bought in, the project flows like a well-oiled machine.” By focusing on total participation, you can create a culture where every team member is invested in the success of the project, leading to better outcomes for everyone involved.

FAQ

What does total participation mean in construction?
Total participation means that everyone on the project team, from the field to the office and trade partners, is actively involved in decision-making, planning, and execution. It ensures that all voices are heard and that every team member feels accountable for the project’s success.

Why is communication important in construction?
Communication is essential in construction because it ensures that all team members are aligned on the project’s goals, timelines, and expectations. When communication flows both ways, it helps prevent misunderstandings and improves collaboration across all teams.

How do Lean tools like Takt and Last Planner improve construction projects?
Lean tools like Takt planning and Last Planner systems improve project efficiency by creating a structured approach to scheduling and planning. These tools ensure that everyone on the team is engaged in the planning process, improving overall project flow and reducing waste.

How can I create a culture of total participation on my project?
To create a culture of total participation, focus on clear communication, inclusivity, and accountability. Encourage input from all team members, invest in training and development, and use Lean tools to optimize your workflows.

How can Elevate Construction help my team?
Elevate Construction offers superintendent coaching, project support, and leadership development to help field teams stabilize, schedule, and flow. With our expertise, your team can build a culture of total participation and achieve long-term success.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Can We Share The Schedule With Other Softwares?

Posted on January 29, 2026January 29, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 24 min

Why Planning in the Right Format First Makes Everything Easier

Here’s the integration question that comes up constantly: “How can we share our InTakt schedule with other software?” And I absolutely love this question because the answer reveals the fundamental difference between integration that works and integration that fights you constantly. The answer is: you can export from InTakt to Excel, Primavera P6, Microsoft Project, Asta, Phoenix, Vplanner, and other platforms with a single button click. It’s phenomenal. But more importantly, you should build your plan in InTakt first and then export to your baseline. Not the other way around.

This sequence matters enormously. When you plan in time-by-location format using InTakt building your production plan with zones, trade flow, and buffers then export to CPM format for contractual reporting, the workflow is clean and fast. When you try to go the opposite direction building in CPM and converting to production format you fight format incompatibility constantly. Build in the format designed for production. Export to the format required for contracts. This is the integration strategy that actually works.

When Software Integration Becomes a Battle

The real construction pain here is maintaining parallel scheduling systems that never stay synchronized. You have a production plan that superintendents use to coordinate work. You have a CPM schedule that contracts require. Someone updates one. Nobody updates the other. Within weeks, the two schedules show completely different dates and sequences. Nobody trusts either one. Field teams coordinate through text messages because the “official” schedules are outdated fiction. And you’re paying for multiple software systems that create confusion instead of coordination.

The pain isn’t just wasted software costs. It’s the coordination chaos that parallel unsynchronized systems create. Trade partners ask “which schedule is right?” Project managers don’t know whether to believe the production plan or the CPM export. Owners see CPM schedules that don’t match what’s actually happening in the field. Everyone loses trust in formal planning because the systems they see don’t reflect construction reality. And updating both systems manually takes hours nobody has, so neither system stays current.

The Pattern That Creates Integration Failure

The failure pattern is treating integration as a data conversion problem instead of recognizing it’s a workflow design problem. We think if we just find the right export settings or write the right conversion scripts, we can magically keep CPM and production plans synchronized. We focus on file formats, data mapping, and technical conversion details. And we miss that the real problem is trying to maintain truth in two places simultaneously when those places organize information fundamentally differently.

What actually happens is the dual-maintenance burden becomes unsustainable. Someone updates the production plan based on field coordination. They forget to update the CPM schedule. Or they try to update the CPM but realize the changes don’t map cleanly because CPM organizes by deliverables while production plans organize by location. So, they approximate. The approximation creates divergence. The divergence grows until the schedules are telling different stories. And everyone stops trusting formal planning because it’s clearly disconnected from reality.

Understanding the One-Way Integration Flow

Let me show you how integration actually works when you do it correctly. Start in InTakt where you can see live data, buyout status, procurement tracking, trade partner preparation processes, deferred submittals, and your complete production plan. When you do your pull plan, it becomes one of these sequences in your production plan. From there, you can pull up lookaheads showing the next six weeks. You can generate weekly work plans showing specific commitments. You’re running your Last Planner System directly in the production planning tool. Everything’s integrated already no parallel systems, no dual maintenance, one source of truth.

Now, what if you need to export to other applications? This happens all the time for contractual requirements. Click the export button. Choose your format: Excel for spreadsheet analysis, Primavera P6 for owners who require XML files, Microsoft Project for teams using Microsoft tools. Click export. The file automatically shows up in your downloads. It’s that simple. One click, immediate export, ready to import into whatever system your contract requires.

The Minor Cleanup That Maximizes Schedule Health

Here’s what happens after export: there are usually one or two small things you can fix to get a really high schedule health score in CPM. Not major reconstruction. Not complete replanning. Minor adjustments that align the exported data with CPM best practices. Maybe adding a constraint that CPM expects. Maybe adjusting a lag that InTakt handled differently. Small fixes that take minutes, not hours.

This is vastly different from trying to convert CPM to production format where you’re fixing fundamental structure problems, not just scoring optimizations. When you export from InTakt to CPM, you’re going from clean production planning to contractual reporting format. The structure is solid. You’re just polishing presentation. When you try to go the opposite direction, you’re trying to fix structural problems that CPM’s format created. The difference is enormous.

Software Compatibility That Actually Works

We’ve recently tested exports with multiple platforms: Primavera P6, Asta, Phoenix Project, Microsoft Project, and Vplanner. There are many more software options available. The point isn’t that InTakt connects to every possible scheduling platform the point is that the export process is standardized and simple. It’s a click of a button. You export. You import into your required schedule software. You have a compliant baseline that satisfies contractual requirements while maintaining your production plan in the format designed for actual coordination.

This compatibility matters because it removes the “we can’t use InTakt because our contract requires P6” objection. You can use InTakt for production planning even when contracts mandate CPM formats. You build in InTakt. You coordinate in InTakt. You execute from InTakt. And you export to P6 or MS Project when you need to submit contractual schedule updates. The tools work together instead of forcing you to choose between good planning and contract compliance.

Why Building in InTakt First Matters

The sequence is critical: build your plan in InTakt, then export to baseline. Not: build in CPM, then try to convert to production format. Why does this direction matter so much? Because InTakt is designed for production planning. It’s time-by-location format shows work flowing through zones. It visualizes trade sequence diagonally through space. It filters to lookaheads and weekly work plans automatically. It integrates with Last Planner System natively. When you plan in this format, you’re thinking about production flow from the start.

When you plan in CPM first, you’re thinking about deliverable completion dates and logic relationships. Nothing wrong with that for certain purposes, but it’s not production planning. You’re organizing by what gets delivered, not by where work happens. When you export from InTakt to CPM, you’re converting production thinking to contractual reporting. When you try to go the opposite direction, you’re trying to retrofit production thinking onto a schedule that was organized around completely different principles. One direction is simple translation. The other direction is fundamental restructuring.

Creating Compliant Baselines Effortlessly

The export creates compliant baselines that satisfy contractual requirements. Not approximate schedules that kind of look right. Actual compliant baselines with proper activity structure, correct relationships, appropriate constraints, and valid logic. The export isn’t just dumping data into a different format. It’s translating time-by-location production planning into time-by-deliverable contractual reporting while maintaining the underlying planning intelligence.

This means you can submit schedule updates that pass owner review and satisfy contract requirements without ever planning directly in CPM. You’re planning in the format that creates actual coordination. You’re exporting to the format that satisfies contracts. Both needs get met without forcing you to choose between production effectiveness and contractual compliance.

Supporting Small Updates and Full Baselines

The export function supports both full baseline exports and small update exports. Need to submit your initial baseline schedule? Export the complete production plan. Need to submit a monthly schedule update? Export just the changes since last month. The flexibility lets you satisfy various reporting requirements without manual reconstruction each time. The production plan stays current because you’re using it daily for coordination. The CPM exports stay current because generating them takes minutes, not hours.

This regular export capability prevents the drift that kills parallel systems. When updating CPM takes hours of manual work, people delay updates until they’re forced by contract milestones. By then, the CPM is weeks or months outdated. When exporting takes one click, you can generate updated CPM schedules weekly or even daily if needed. The current production plan becomes current CPM export without manual reconstruction barrier.

Why Single Source of Truth Works

Watch for these signs that your scheduling integration is working properly:

One system serves as source of truth for planning (InTakt for production)
Other systems receive exported data for reporting (CPM for contracts)
Updates happen in the source system, not in multiple places simultaneously
Exports generate quickly without manual reconstruction
Field teams coordinate from production plan, owners receive contractual reports
Nobody questions “which schedule is right” because one feeds the other

When you see these patterns, integration is serving coordination instead of creating confusion. The workflow supports both production planning and contractual reporting without forcing dual maintenance or creating divergence.

The Technical Details That Matter

Let me be specific about export formats and what they enable. Excel exports give you complete project data in spreadsheet format for custom analysis, reporting, or integration with other tools. P6 exports create XML files that import directly into Primavera for owners who contractually require that platform. Microsoft Project exports create MPP files for teams using Microsoft tools. Each export includes activities, durations, relationships, dates, and all the data needed for that platform to render the schedule properly.

The exports aren’t lossy conversions that drop information. They’re complete translations that maintain planning intelligence in the target format. When you import an InTakt export into P6, you get a functional P6 schedule with proper logic, not a corrupted file requiring reconstruction. The export quality means you’re truly satisfying contractual requirements, not just technically submitting files that fail owner review.

Building Integration That Serves Projects

This connects to everything we teach at Elevate Construction about creating systems that serve actual needs instead of creating process overhead. Scheduling integration should enable better coordination, not create administrative burden. When you build in production format and export to reporting format, integration serves coordination by maintaining one truth and rendering it in formats various stakeholders need. When you try to maintain multiple parallel truths, integration becomes coordination enemy instead of coordination enabler.

If your project needs help setting up scheduling workflows that integrate production planning with contractual reporting requirements, if your team struggles with parallel scheduling systems that never synchronize, if you’re manually maintaining CPM and production plans separately, Elevate Construction can help design workflows where one system feeds the other automatically. The integration matters. The workflow direction matters. Get it right and software enables coordination instead of creating confusion.

A Challenge for Scheduling Leaders

Here’s the challenge. Stop maintaining parallel scheduling systems that drift out of sync within weeks. Start building one production plan in the format designed for coordination, then exporting to formats required for reporting. Choose InTakt or similar time-by-location tools for production planning. Use CPM exports for contractual reporting. Let the production plan be truth. Let the exports be views of that truth in required formats.

Train your team on the workflow: plan in InTakt, coordinate in InTakt, update in InTakt, export to CPM as needed. Don’t train them to maintain both systems independently. That creates dual-maintenance burden nobody can sustain. Single source of truth. Multiple views of that truth. This is integration that works because it respects that coordination and reporting are different needs requiring different formats without requiring duplicate planning effort.

The export works. The integration is clean. The workflow is simple. And it’s all available right now for teams ready to stop fighting software integration and start using integration to serve coordination. As W. Edwards Deming said: “It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best.” Know that building in production format first, then exporting to reporting format, is what works. Then do that. The integration becomes effortless instead of endless.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I start in CPM and export to InTakt?

You can, but it’s harder because CPM is time-by-deliverable format and InTakt is time-by-location format. Converting requires restructuring, not just translating. Going from InTakt to CPM is simple export. Going CPM to InTakt requires fixing fundamental organization differences. Build in InTakt, export to CPM when needed.

How often should I export to CPM for contract compliance?

As often as contracts require schedule updates typically monthly, but some projects require weekly or only at milestones. Since export is one click, you can generate updated CPM schedules anytime without manual reconstruction. The frequency depends on contractual requirements, not technical limitations.

Will my owner accept an InTakt export instead of native CPM?

Most owners who require CPM schedules accept properly formatted P6 or MS Project files regardless of what tool created them. They care about format compliance and schedule quality, not which software generated it. InTakt exports create compliant schedules that pass owner review.

What if I need to make changes in the CPM schedule?

Don’t. Make changes in InTakt, then export updated CPM. If you start editing the CPM independently, you’ve created parallel systems that will diverge. InTakt is your source of truth. CPM exports are views of that truth. Maintain truth in one place, generate views as needed.

Does export work for small schedule updates or only full baselines?

Both. You can export complete schedules for baseline submissions or partial exports for update submissions. The flexibility lets you satisfy various reporting requirements. Export what you need when you need it without manual reconstruction each time.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

How Do We Use InTakt On-Site With Our Team?

Posted on January 29, 2026January 29, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 28 min

How InTakt Software Actually Works in Your Conference Room

Here’s something most people miss about production planning software: it’s not about replacing visual management. It’s about connecting visual management to scalable digital planning that reaches every trade partner and field worker. InTakt software sits at the center of your conference room, bridging the gap between sticky notes on walls and coordination that actually happens in real time. And when you understand how to use InTakt within the complete conference room flow from left to right, from visual boards to digital screens to field execution you transform planning from documentation exercise into actual production coordination.

The conference room layout matters. On the left side, you have team boards covering PTO, meeting cadence, accountability charts, and hot items. Moving right, you have site visualization boards where trade partners mark problems with red magnets before meetings start. At the front, you have discuss-and-solve boards plus two screens running InTakt where you actually do the planning work. On the right side, you have trade partner assessments, whiteboards, pull planning areas, and agendas. And InTakt connects all of this it’s the central figure in your conference room as you look from left to right, the tool that makes visual management scalable instead of trapped on walls.

When Planning Software Becomes Another Unused Tool

The real construction pain here is buying planning software and watching it become shelfware. You invest in tools like InTakt or P6 or any scheduling platform. You train people how to use it. You set up accounts. And six months later, nobody’s using it consistently because it never connected to their actual workflow. The software sits disconnected from how coordination actually happens. Superintendents keep planning with sticky notes and text messages because the software didn’t integrate with the visual management practices that actually work in construction.

The pain isn’t that the software is bad. It’s that implementation failed to bridge visual management and digital planning. People can see problems on site visualization boards. They can discuss solutions on whiteboards. They can make commitments in meetings. But none of that translates into updated digital plans that inform the next day’s work. The software becomes a parallel documentation system something you update after decisions are made for contractual reporting, not something you use to make decisions and coordinate work in real time.

The Pattern That Leaves Software Unused

The failure pattern is treating planning software as schedule documentation instead of coordination tool. We think software is where you record the plan after you’ve figured it out elsewhere. We use visual boards for actual planning and collaboration. We use whiteboards for problem-solving. We use meetings for coordination. And we use software to document what we decided so there’s a formal schedule for reporting. This workflow treats software as the output of planning, not as the tool that enables planning.

What actually happens is the disconnect creates waste. You plan visually, then spend hours transcribing decisions into software. The software is always outdated because updating it requires manual transcription. Field teams don’t trust the digital plan because it doesn’t match what was discussed in meetings. So they ignore it and rely on the superintendent’s verbal updates instead. The software investment delivered zero coordination value because it never became part of the actual decision-making and coordination flow.

Understanding the Conference Room Layout

Let me walk you through the complete conference room setup from left to right, showing where InTakt fits and how it connects to everything else. This layout isn’t arbitrary. It’s designed to create flow from team coordination to problem identification to digital planning to field execution.

On the left side of your conference room, implement team part one boards. These handle coverage and PTO scheduling so everyone knows who’s available when. They show meeting cadence so everyone knows what meetings happen when and what each meeting accomplishes. They display accountability charts showing who’s responsible for what. And they track hot items requiring immediate attention. These boards create team coordination foundation before you get into production planning specifics.

Moving right, the part two boards visualize the site physically. These boards show floor plans, zone layouts, or area maps. And here’s the critical workflow: before people start collaborating in meetings whether daily Last Planner huddles or weekly coordination meetings trade partners mark problems on these boards with red magnets or red dots. Problems visible. Problems located spatially. This visual problem identification becomes your meeting agenda. You’re not asking “does anyone have problems?” You’re looking at the board and seeing exactly where problems exist and prioritizing which ones to solve first.

At the front of the room, you need discuss-and-solve boards plus two screens. The discuss-and-solve boards on the left side capture problem-solving discussions. Write problems orange boards. Work through solutions. Track decisions. These boards handle the thinking work. But the two screens at the front are where you actually implement decisions in InTakt. This is where visual management connects to digital planning. Problems identified on site boards, solutions discussed on solve boards, decisions implemented in InTakt on the screens.

How InTakt Works in the Coordination Flow

Here’s what InTakt looks like in action during meetings. You can see key activities displayed visually. You can review the legend showing what colors and symbols mean. You can adjust plan dates when reality changes. Click into any activity and adjust how long it will take. Mark roadblocks that need removal. Do basically anything you need for production coordination.

The workflow is: problems marked on site boards with red magnets become meeting agenda. Team discusses solutions using discuss-and-solve boards. Solutions requiring schedule changes get implemented immediately in InTakt on the front screens. Everyone sees the updates in real time. No transcription delay. No disconnected systems. Visual identification flows to digital implementation instantly.

And here’s what makes InTakt powerful: once modifications are made, you can export lookaheads and weekly work plans immediately. Not hours later after someone manually builds them. Immediately. You adjust the production plan in the meeting based on real coordination discussions, then filter out the updated lookahead showing the next six weeks. Filter out the updated weekly work plan showing commitments for the coming week. The exports reflect actual coordination decisions, not someone’s best guess at what was decided after the meeting ended.

Using InTakt for Multiple Planning Horizons

InTakt serves three planning horizons simultaneously: production plan (your norm-level Takt plan), lookahead (six weeks filtered from production plan), and weekly work plan (one week filtered from lookahead). This vertical alignment is critical. When you update the production plan, lookaheads automatically update. When lookaheads change, weekly work plans automatically adjust. You’re maintaining one source of truth that renders at different time scales depending on what people need to see.

During meetings, you can add detailed subtasks into any wagon or work package. The weekly work plan isn’t just activities it’s detailed subtasks showing exactly what’s happening each day within each zone. This level of detail makes commitments concrete. Trade partners aren’t committing to vague activities like “install drywall.” They’re committing to specific tasks like “install drywall in zones A-C, east wing, second floor, tape and mud to follow.” The specificity creates accountability and makes coordination real.

Connecting Digital Planning to Field Execution

On the right side of the conference room, you have trade partner assessments, whiteboards, pull planning areas, and agendas. This is where relationship management and longer-term planning happen. But everything flows through InTakt. Pull plans created on walls get entered into InTakt as production plans. Trade partner assessments inform who gets assigned to activities in InTakt. Meeting agendas get built from InTakt data showing what needs coordination.

The integration means InTakt isn’t isolated software that only planner’s touch. It’s the central coordination hub that connects all the visual management, problem-solving, and relationship work happening in the physical conference room. The visual boards make problems visible. The discuss-and-solve boards enable solutions. InTakt implements solutions digitally. And the digital implementation scales to every trade partner and every worker in the field.

Why “Central Figure” Describes It Perfectly

InTakt is the central figure in your conference room as you look from left to right. This isn’t metaphor. It’s accurate description of the workflow. You start on the left with team coordination. You move to site visualization in the middle-left. You discuss and solve at the front using InTakt screens. You continue right to relationship management and longer-term planning. And InTakt sits at the center, taking input from all the visual management and converting it into digital plans that scale beyond the conference room walls.

This matters because visual management doesn’t scale well. Sticky notes on conference room walls inform the 10-15 people who attend meetings. They don’t inform the 50 trade partners working in the field. They don’t inform the foremen managing crews in different zones. They don’t inform the superintendent’s boss who needs project status. InTakt makes visual management scalable by converting visible problems and discussed solutions into digital plans that anyone can access from anywhere.

The Complete Planning Hierarchy

InTakt handles your complete planning hierarchy from strategic to tactical. At the top, you have your master plan or macro Takt plan showing phases with milestones. Below that, you have production plans (norm-level Takt plans) showing detailed zone-by-zone execution. Below that, you filter lookaheads showing the next six weeks to make work ready and remove roadblocks. Below that, you filter weekly work plans showing specific commitments and handoffs for the coming week. And below that, you can drill into detailed subtasks showing daily execution specifics.

All of this lives in one tool. You’re not maintaining a macro plan in one system, production plan in another, lookaheads in spreadsheets, and weekly work plans on whiteboards. It’s one integrated system where strategic planning feeds tactical execution automatically. When you adjust the macro plan, production plans update. When production plans change, lookaheads adjust. When lookaheads shift, weekly work plans adapt. The vertical alignment is maintained automatically instead of requiring manual transcription across systems.

Why Two Screens Matter

The two screens at the front of the conference room aren’t luxury. They’re necessity for effective coordination. Screen one can show the production plan with the current week highlighted. Screen two can show the lookahead or weekly work plan being discussed. Trade partners can see both simultaneously the strategic context on one screen, tactical details on the other. This dual view enables coordination conversations that connect strategic intent to tactical execution.

During meetings, you’re not switching between views constantly and losing context. You’re seeing strategic and tactical simultaneously. “Here’s where we are in the production plan. Here’s what that means for this week’s commitments. Here’s what’s coming in the lookahead that we need to make ready.” The visibility creates alignment. Everyone sees the same data at the same time from different perspectives that inform their specific responsibilities.

Making Planning Live Instead of Stagnant

Here’s the transformation: visual boards alone are stagnant. They show what was true when someone last updated them. They can’t scale beyond who can physically see them. InTakt makes planning live and scalable. It’s not stagnant on the wall. It updates in real time as coordination decisions happen. It scales to every trade partner and every worker in the field who needs to see what’s happening when and where.

This changes the planning relationship. Visual boards were input mechanisms ways to capture problems and discuss solutions. InTakt is the execution mechanism the tool that converts discussions into coordinated plans that inform actual work. The visual boards haven’t disappeared. They’re still handling the crucial work of making problems visible and enabling collaborative problem-solving. But InTakt ensures that work translates into digital plans that guide field execution instead of staying trapped in conference room conversations.

Integration That Creates Flow

Watch for these signs that your planning software integrates properly with visual management:

Problems marked on site boards flow directly to software updates during meetings
Lookaheads and weekly work plans export immediately after coordination discussions
Field teams reference digital plans instead of waiting for superintendent interpretation
Updates happen in meetings with everyone watching, not afterwards by one person
Visual boards and digital plans stay synchronized because they’re part of one workflow

When you see these patterns, planning software is doing its job connecting visual management to scalable digital coordination. When you don’t see these patterns, software is just documentation exercise disconnected from actual coordination.

Building Conference Rooms That Coordinate

This connects to everything we teach at Elevate Construction about creating systems that respect people and enable effective coordination. Visual management respects how humans process information we see problems, discuss solutions, make commitments. Digital planning enables scale we convert local coordination into information that reaches everyone who needs it. InTakt bridges these two needs, making visual management scalable instead of forcing choice between visual effectiveness and digital reach.

If your project needs help setting up conference rooms that actually coordinate instead of just holding meetings, if your team struggles to connect visual management to digital planning, if your planning software sits unused because it never integrated with actual workflow, Elevate Construction can help design and implement systems that work. The conference room layout matters. The software integration matters. The workflow from visual to digital matters. Get it right and planning becomes coordination instead of documentation.

A Challenge for Project Leaders

Here’s the challenge. Stop treating planning software as schedule documentation separate from coordination. Start integrating it into your conference room workflow as the tool that makes visual management scalable. Set up site boards where problems get marked. Set up solve boards where solutions get discussed. Set up screens where decisions get implemented in InTakt immediately. And create the workflow where visual identification flows to digital implementation in real time.

Train your team on the complete workflow, not just the software. Show them how site boards connect to InTakt updates. Show them how solve board discussions become plan adjustments. Show them how immediate exports create lookaheads and weekly work plans that guide field work. The software competency matters, but the workflow integration matters more. As Peter Drucker said: “Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things.” InTakt helps you do planning right visual management helps you do the right planning. Integration creates both efficiency and effectiveness.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do we need visual boards if we have InTakt software?

Visual boards make problems visible and enable collaborative problem-solving in ways screens can’t match. InTakt makes solutions scalable in ways physical boards can’t match. You need both visual boards for effective collaboration, InTakt to convert collaboration into digital coordination that reaches everyone.

Can InTakt replace our current CPM schedule?

InTakt can serve as your production planning tool and export to CPM format when contracts require it. Many teams plan in InTakt for coordination benefits, then export to P6 or MS Project for contractual reporting. You maintain one production plan that renders in multiple formats as needed.

How do lookaheads and weekly work plans export from InTakt?

InTakt filters your production plan to show the next six weeks (lookahead) or one week (weekly work plan). When you adjust the production plan based on coordination discussions, exports update automatically. You’re not building lookaheads manually you’re filtering them from the master production plan.

Do trade partners need InTakt accounts to benefit from this system?

Trade partners can benefit through exports and visual plans without needing full accounts. The superintendent and project team use InTakt in meetings to coordinate and create plans. Trade partners receive exported lookaheads and weekly work plans showing their specific work. Full accounts help but aren’t required for basic coordination.

What if our conference room doesn’t have space for all these boards?

Scale the system to your space. The principles matter more than having every board. At minimum: site visualization boards where problems get marked, screens running InTakt for digital planning, and some space for problem-solving discussions. The workflow visual to digital, collaborative to scalable adapts to available space.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

How Accurate Are Your Construction Cost Estimates?

Posted on January 29, 2026January 29, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 27 min

Why Most Construction Estimates Fail (And How to Build Budgets That Hold)

Here’s a question we get constantly at Elevate Construction when we’re serving as general contractor or construction manager: “How accurate are your construction cost estimates?” And the question reveals something important about how the industry typically approaches estimating. Most people ask this question because they’ve been burned by estimates that looked good in preconstruction and fell apart during execution. They’ve watched budgets that seemed solid become disasters when actual trade bids came in. They’ve experienced the painful conversation where the GC says “we’re over budget” six months into planning and the owner has to cut scope or find more money.

Our answer is simple: we’ve been able to meet budget with every estimate we’ve done. Not by luck. Not by sandbagging numbers. Through a systematic validation process that catches problems before they become crises. We use control estimates that we build ourselves, third-party estimator validation, competitive trade partner pricing, and comparison to historical reference classes. When all four validation methods align, we know the estimate is solid. When they don’t align, we know exactly where to dig deeper before committing to numbers.

When Estimates Become Expensive Guesses

The real construction pain here is treating estimating as data collection instead of analysis and validation. General contractors receive a set of drawings. They send them out to trade partners for pricing. They aggregate the responses. They add general conditions and fee. They present a number to the owner. And they cross their fingers hoping the trade partners understood the scope correctly, priced competitively, and didn’t miss anything major. This isn’t estimating. It’s hope-based budgeting with a spreadsheet attached.

The pain explodes during buyout when reality hits. Trade partner A comes back 30% higher than their preconstruction estimate because they found complexity the drawings didn’t show. Trade partner B comes back lower but excluded critical scope everyone assumed was included. Trade partner C didn’t bid at all because they’re too busy. The GC scrambles to find replacement pricing, value engineer the scope, and explain to the owner why the budget just grew by $2 million. And the owner loses trust in the GC’s ability to manage costs, which poisons the relationship for the entire project.

The Pattern That Creates Budget Disasters

The failure pattern is treating trade partner bids as gospel without independent validation. We send out drawings and assume the responses represent accurate pricing for the scope shown. We don’t verify that our understanding of quantities matches the trade partners’ understanding. We don’t check whether pricing aligns with historical data from similar projects. We don’t validate that all scope is covered and nothing is double-counted or omitted. We just collect numbers and present them to owners as if collecting makes them accurate.

What actually happens is systematic errors compound across trades. Every trade partner makes assumptions about what’s included in their scope versus others’ scopes. Every bid has omissions and misunderstandings. Every pricing spreadsheet has hidden qualifications and exclusions. When you aggregate these without validation, you’re stacking errors upon errors. The resulting budget looks precise because it has lots of decimal places. But it’s built on assumptions nobody validated, which means it’s going to fail when actual work begins.

Understanding the Four-Layer Validation System

Let me break down how we build estimates that actually hold through execution. This isn’t magic. It’s systematic validation using multiple independent methods that catch errors before they become budget surprises.

Layer one: control estimates. We do our own quantity takeoffs. We don’t just rely on trade partners to tell us how much work exists. We measure it ourselves from the drawings. We calculate concrete quantities, linear feet of walls, square footage of finishes, equipment counts, system complexities. We estimate critical scope elements according to historical reference classes and production data we’ve gathered from past projects and current market conditions. This gives us independent understanding of what the project should cost before we see trade partner pricing.

This step is critical and many general contractors skip it. They don’t do their own takeoffs because it’s time-consuming and requires expertise. They trust trade partners to measure correctly and price accurately. And they lose the ability to validate whether incoming bids make sense because they have no baseline for comparison. Without control estimates, you can’t tell whether a trade bid is accurate, aggressive, or completely wrong.

Layer two: third-party estimator validation. We engage independent professional estimators who bring different perspective and catch things we might miss. Third-party estimators aren’t emotionally invested in the project. They’re not trying to win the work. They’re purely analyzing scope and validating pricing. This independence is valuable because it reveals blind spots. Maybe we interpreted a detail one way and the third-party estimator saw it differently. That discrepancy forces conversation that improves understanding before we commit to pricing.

Layer three: competitive trade partner pricing. We go out to trade partners we’ve developed relationships with and get competitive bids. But we’re not just collecting numbers. We’re validating that trade partners understand the scope, checking their pricing against our control estimates, and asking questions when numbers don’t align. If a trade comes back at $500K and our control estimate showed $700K, we don’t just take the low number and celebrate. We ask: what did they exclude? What did we include that they didn’t? Where’s the gap and which number represents actual scope?

Layer four: historical reference class comparison. We compare the emerging budget to similar completed projects. Not just total cost per square foot that’s too crude. We compare at the trade level. What did mechanical cost on similar hospitals? What did site work cost on similar data centers? What did general conditions run on similar timelines? Historical data from actually-completed projects reveals whether our estimates are realistic or aspirational.

Why Each Layer Catches Different Errors

The power of this four-layer system is each layer catches error the others miss. Control estimates catch scope omissions because we’re measuring everything ourselves. Third-party validation catches interpretation errors because independent eyes see details we missed. Trade partner pricing catches market reality because they’re the ones actually doing the work. Historical comparison catches optimistic assumptions because completed projects reveal what actually happened versus what we hoped would happen.

When all four layers align, you have very high confidence the estimate is accurate. When they don’t align, you have clear direction for where to investigate. If trade pricing comes in 20% below control estimates, that’s not good news it’s a red flag that someone misunderstood scope. If historical comparison shows you’re estimating general conditions at half what similar projects actually needed, that’s warning to reconsider your assumptions. The validation system creates feedback loops that improve accuracy before you commit to the owner.

The Role of Live Budget Communication

Here’s what separates this approach from typical practice: we communicate estimates as live budgets with our clients throughout the process. Not just at milestones. Continuously. As we develop control estimates, owners see our thinking. As third-party validation comes in, owners see comparisons. As trade pricing arrives, owners see how it stacks against our expectations. As historical comparisons reveal patterns, owners see how their project compares to reality.

This transparency does two things. First, it prevents surprise. Owners aren’t blindsided by budget growth because they’ve been tracking estimate development continuously. If numbers are trending up, they know early enough to make decisions about scope or funding. Second, it builds trust. Owners see we’re not hiding problems or sandbagging numbers. We’re showing them our actual estimating process with all the validation layers visible. That transparency creates partnership instead of adversarial budget negotiations.

Working With the Right Trade Partners

Notice layer three depends on having trade partners we’ve developed real time relationships with. Not just vendors we send drawings to. Partners who understand our expectations, trust our approach, and know we’re running lean projects where they’ll have good flow and predictable work. These relationships matter because they change how trade partners engage with estimates.

Trade partners who trust you price accurately instead of defensively. They don’t pad numbers assuming you’ll beat them down or create chaos during execution. They don’t exclude scope hoping to catch you with change orders later. They price based on real understanding of what the project needs because they know you’ve planned properly and they’ll be able to execute with flow. The relationships improve estimate accuracy because they remove the gaming and defensive positioning that pollutes typical bidding.

This is why we’re able to get our general requirements and general conditions where they need to be and still run lean projects. Trade partners see value in our approach. They’re willing to price competitively because they know they’ll work on projects with flow instead of chaos. They participate in estimate development as partners instead of adversaries. And that partnership creates pricing that reflects actual work requirements instead of risk premiums covering expected chaos.

Educating Design Teams Before Design Development

The final piece that makes estimates accurate is engaging design teams before design development so we don’t have constructability surprises. When we review drawings at 30% or 50% design development, it’s too late to catch major scope issues without expensive redesign. When we engage at 15% or concept design, we can identify problems while they’re still easy to fix.

This early engagement prevents the classic pattern where designs develop without construction input, estimates come back over budget, and everyone scrambles to value engineer scope that shouldn’t have been designed that way in the first place. Instead, we’re educating design teams about construction realities what’s expensive, what’s difficult, what looks simple but creates chaos before they commit to design decisions. The education prevents problems instead of discovering them after they’re expensive to fix.

Why Fee Stays Reasonable Despite This Investment

You might think all this validation control estimates, third-party review, relationship development, design engagement would require premium fees to cover the cost. But we’re actually very reasonable when it comes to fee. How? Because the investment in accurate estimating prevents the expensive problems that plague typical projects. We’re not chasing change orders because scope was estimated wrong. We’re not fighting with trade partners because expectations weren’t aligned. We’re not burning superintendent time coordinating chaos that proper planning would have prevented.

The lean project approach means lower general conditions because we need less staff correcting problems. It means better trade pricing because partners trust they’ll have flow. It means fewer contingency draws because accurate estimates reduce surprises. The upfront investment in proper estimating pays for itself many times over through cleaner execution. We can charge reasonable fees because we’re eliminating waste that others price in as “cost of doing business.”

The Results That Validate the System

The proof is simple: we’ve been able to meet budget with every estimate we’ve done. Not “most estimates.” Not “estimates within reasonable variance.” Every estimate. Because the four-layer validation system catches problems before they become commitments. When we present an estimate to an owner, we’ve already validated it four different ways. We’ve already investigated discrepancies. We’ve already aligned with trade partners. We’ve already compared to historical reality. The presented number isn’t a hope. It’s a validated prediction.

This track record matters because it changes the relationship dynamic with owners. They stop treating our estimates as opening offers in a negotiation. They start treating them as reliable planning numbers they can commit funding against. That trust enables better decisions. Owners can commit to scope knowing the budget is solid. They can proceed to funding approval knowing the numbers will hold. They can avoid the painful cut-scope-or-find-money conversations that poison typical projects.

Building Estimates That Serve Projects

This connects to everything we teach at Elevate Construction about building systems that create predictable outcomes instead of hoping for good results. Estimating isn’t separate from production planning. It’s the financial version of the same discipline understanding scope, validating assumptions, creating buffers, and designing systems that work instead of guessing and hoping. If your project needs construction management or general contractor services with estimating that actually holds through execution, we bring systematic validation methods that prevent budget disasters.

Whether we’re serving as CM or GC, we’re ready to bring this four-layer validation approach to your project anytime. The estimates are accurate because we validate systematically instead of guessing hopefully. And that accuracy creates the foundation for successful projects where owners, GCs, and trade partners all win because the financial planning matched the construction reality.

A Challenge for Project Owners

Here’s the challenge. Stop accepting estimates built only on trade partner bids without independent validation. Start demanding that your GC or CM show you their control estimate, their third-party validation, and their historical comparison. Ask: how did you validate this number? What happens if trade bids come back different? How will you know if scope is missing? Where are your blind spots?

GCs who can answer these questions have systematic validation processes. GCs who can’t answer are hoping trade partners got it right and crossing fingers nothing was missed. One approach creates budgets that hold. The other creates budget disasters disguised as precision because they have lots of decimal places. Choose GCs who validate systematically. Choose partners who communicate transparently through live budgets. Choose relationships built on partnership instead of adversarial positioning.

We’ve been doing this very well and very competitively. The estimates hold because we validate properly. The fees stay reasonable because lean execution eliminates waste. The relationships work because transparency and partnership replace gaming and defensive positioning. And it’s surprising at least to me how unusual this approach is in an industry that desperately needs better cost predictability. As W. Edwards Deming said: “If you can’t describe what you are doing as a process, you don’t know what you’re doing.” We have a process. It validates. It works. And it’s ready to serve your project.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do you do control estimates when trade partners will bid the work anyway?

Control estimates give us independent understanding of quantities and costs so we can validate whether trade bids make sense. Without our own estimates, we can’t tell if incoming pricing is accurate, aggressive, or missing scope. The control estimate is the baseline that makes validation possible.

What happens if trade bids come back different from your estimate?

We investigate the discrepancy. If they’re higher, we ask what they saw that we missed. If they’re lower, we ask what they excluded that we included. The gap forces conversation that improves understanding. We never just accept numbers that don’t align with our validation.

How early do you need to engage to provide accurate estimates?

Earlier is better. Concept or 15% design lets us educate design teams before major decisions lock in. 30-50% design development lets us validate scope before construction documents. We can estimate at any stage, but early engagement prevents expensive redesign when our estimates reveal problems.

Do you share your control estimates with trade partners?

Selectively. We use control estimates to validate whether trade pricing makes sense, not to negotiate them down. If a trade bid seems wrong, we’ll share relevant quantity information to align understanding. But we don’t use our estimates to beat up trade partners that damages relationships and creates defensive pricing.

Can you serve projects where the design is already complete?

Yes, but estimate accuracy may be lower if we weren’t involved in design. We can still do control estimates, third-party validation, and historical comparison on completed designs. But we can’t prevent constructability issues that would have been caught with earlier engagement. Accuracy is highest when we’re involved throughout design development.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

What Type Of Projects Do You Specialize In?

Posted on January 29, 2026January 29, 2026 by Danny Jiménez⁩

Read 23 min

Why Production Systems Work on Any Project Type

Here’s a question I get often: “What types of projects do you specialize in at Elevate Construction?” And I love this question because the answer reveals something important about production planning systems. The answer is: really any type. Whether it’s multifamily or hospitals or laboratories or anything in commercial construction, we excel at it. And that’s not because we’re generalists without deep expertise. It’s because the production planning principles we teach Takt, Last Planner, flow-based coordination work across all project types when applied correctly.

I’ve got 25+ years of experience as an industry leader in construction with real construction projects. Not consulting from the sidelines. Actually building. And what that experience taught me is that the fundamental principles of production flow don’t change based on whether you’re building apartments, operating rooms, or data centers. Work still happens in physical space. Trades still need to flow through zones. Coordination still requires spatial and temporal alignment. Systems still protect people better than heroics. The project types differ. The production principles don’t.

When Specialization Becomes Limitation

The real construction pain here is companies that specialize so narrowly they can’t adapt their methods to different project types. You find firms that only build multifamily and use methods that work for repetitive residential construction but break down when applied to complex healthcare projects. Or you find specialty contractors who excel at laboratories but struggle with basic commercial work because their methods are over-engineered for standard projects. The specialization that creates depth in one area creates blindness to principles that work universally.

The opposite problem exists too: companies claiming universal expertise without systems backing that claim. They say they build everything but what they really mean is they use the same broken methods everywhere. They apply CPM to hospitals the same way they apply it to apartments. They coordinate trades reactively regardless of project complexity. They push schedules when behind regardless of whether pushing makes sense for that specific work. The universal claim is true they do work on any project type but they’re equally ineffective across all of them because they lack production system understanding.

The Pattern Most Builders Miss

The failure pattern is assuming planning methods must change fundamentally based on project type. We think hospital planning requires completely different approaches than multifamily planning. We believe data center coordination has nothing in common with laboratory coordination. We treat each specialty as requiring unique methods that can’t transfer. And we stay trapped in narrow expertise because we never learned the universal principles underlying successful production across all project types.

What actually happens is the surface characteristics differ while the fundamental production principles remain constant. Yes, hospitals have infection control requirements that apartments don’t have. Yes, data centers have critical power and cooling systems that office buildings don’t have. Yes, laboratories have contamination protocols that retail spaces don’t have. These specialty requirements are real and important. But underneath those surface differences, the production fundamentals are identical.

Every project needs proper work packaging so trades have consistent duration activities. Every project benefit from zoning strategies that create flow instead of chaos. Every project requires milestone setting that creates achievable targets with buffers protecting against variation. Every project coordinates better when trades can see where they’re working and who they’re handing off to. These principles work on apartments, hospitals, data centers, laboratories, and every other commercial construction project type.

Understanding Universal Production Principles

Let me break down why Takt planning and lean production systems work across project types. The principles are:

Work happens in space, not just time. Whether you’re building repetitive residential units or unique surgical suites, the work physically occurs in zones that trades move through. The complexity of what’s being built differs. The reality that works flows through physical space doesn’t change. Time-by-location planning formats work universally because space is universal to construction.

Trades need consistent work to maintain rhythm. A mechanical crew needs predictable work packages whether they’re installing basic HVAC in apartments or complex medical gas systems in hospitals. The technical requirements differ. The need for rhythm doesn’t. Proper work packaging applies to every trade on every project type.

Coordination requires seeing both temporal and spatial relationships. You need to know what comes next in sequence (temporal) and where it happens (spatial) regardless of project type. CPM only shows temporal relationships. Takt shows both. That advantage applies whether you’re coordinating three trades or thirty trades, simple systems or complex systems.

Buffers protect against variation everywhere. Hospitals have more regulatory checkpoints than apartments. Data centers have more commissioning complexity than warehouses. But every project type experiences variation. Every project benefit from buffers that protect milestones when variation happens. The source of variation differs. The need for protection doesn’t.

Flow creates better outcomes than push everywhere. Pushing trades to work faster when behind schedule damages productivity whether you’re building apartments or laboratories. Creating flow where trades work at sustainable rhythm with clear handoffs produces better outcomes universally. The production principle works regardless of project complexity.

Service Models That Support Production

From a construction management standpoint, we work on projects anywhere between $10 million and $200 million right now until our company grows larger. And we’re ready to serve in multiple roles based on what the project needs. As construction manager helping the GC, we bring production planning expertise that improves how the general contractor coordinates work. As construction manager at risk (CM@R), we take on both planning and execution responsibility, building the project as the general contractor while applying lean production systems throughout. As general contractor on projects that are ready to go, we plan and build using the systems we teach.

This flexibility in service models matters because different project delivery methods need production planning support in different ways. Sometimes the GC has the relationship with the owner but lacks production planning capability CM support fills that gap. Sometimes the owner wants single-source responsibility for both planning and execution CM@R provides that. Sometimes the owner wants a GC who already operates with lean production systems that’s where we serve directly as general contractor. The service model adapts. The production principles we apply don’t change.

Geographic Presence and Project Examples

We’re currently doing business in Arizona, Texas, Colorado, and Utah as we scale. These states represent diverse market conditions, regulatory environments, and project types. And our consulting arm works with data centers, hospitals, airports anything you could possibly think of. The geographic and typological diversity isn’t accidental. It proves the principles work universally when you understand them correctly.

Data centers require precise coordination of critical infrastructure. Hospitals require infection control and phased occupancy planning. Airports require security protocols and operational coordination with active terminals. Multifamily requires repetitive unit construction with efficient trade flow. Laboratories require contamination control and specialized systems. Commercial office requires tenant coordination and value engineering. Every project type has unique specialty requirements. Every project type benefits from the same production planning fundamentals proper zoning, trade flow, buffer management, and visual coordination.

Why 25 Years of Field Experience Matters

The reason I can confidently say we excel at any commercial construction project type comes from 25+ years of actual field experience building these projects before teaching others how to build them. I didn’t learn production planning from books or consulting projects. I learned it from managing actual construction projects hospitals where infection control protocols constrained sequencing, laboratories where contamination protocols required specialty coordination, multifamily where repetition enabled optimization, data centers where uptime requirements drove planning decisions.

That field experience across diverse project types revealed the universal principles underneath the surface differences. Every project had unique specialty requirements. Every project benefited from the same production fundamentals. The learning wasn’t “here’s how to plan hospitals” and “here’s how to plan laboratories” and “here’s how to plan data centers” as if they’re completely different disciplines. The learning was: here are universal production principles that apply everywhere, and here’s how specialty requirements modify application without changing principles.

What Makes Different Project Types Similar

Watch for these production fundamentals that apply across all commercial construction project types:

Zones need leveling for work density regardless of what type of work fills them
Trades need diagonal flow through zones whether it’s simple or complex trades
Milestones need buffers protecting them whether the phase is short or long
Coordination needs visual time-by-location plans whether the team is small or large
Pull planning validates sequence collaboratively whether the scope is simple or complex
Work-in-progress needs alignment with capacity whether the project is small or large

The specialty requirements add complexity. The production principles remain constant.

Current Scale and Growth Trajectory

Our current project size range $10 million to $200 million represents where we operate until the company grows larger. This range captures most commercial construction while we build organizational capacity to handle larger projects. The upper bound isn’t a capability limit from production planning perspective. It’s an organizational scaling consideration about how many large projects we can support simultaneously while maintaining quality.

As we scale, the project size range will expand. The production principles won’t change. Whether we’re planning $50 million hospitals or $500 million hospitals, the fundamentals of zoning, trade flow, buffers, and coordination remain the same. The complexity scales. The principles don’t. This is what allows growth without losing effectiveness the systems work at any scale when understood correctly.

Building on Production Principles, Not Project-Specific Tricks

This connects to everything we teach at Elevate Construction about building capability through principles understanding rather than project-specific tricks. When you understand production fundamentals, you can adapt to any project type. When you only know project-specific methods, you’re limited to those narrow applications. We don’t have separate playbooks for hospitals versus multifamily versus laboratories. We have one production planning system based on universal principles that adapts to specialty requirements without changing fundamentals.

If your project needs production planning support regardless of type whether it’s through construction management consulting, CM@R services, or direct general contractor engagement we bring 25+ years of field experience across diverse project types applying universal lean production principles. The planning creates flow, gains buffers, and coordinates trades effectively whether you’re building apartments or operating rooms.

A Challenge for Project Owners and Leaders

Here’s the challenge. Stop assuming you need specialists who only understand your specific project type. Start looking for builders who understand universal production principles and can adapt them to your specialty requirements. The best hospital builder isn’t necessarily someone who only builds hospitals. It’s someone who understands production flow and knows how to apply it within healthcare regulatory requirements.

Ask potential partners: do you understand Takt planning and time-by-location coordination? Can you demonstrate pull planning that gains buffers? Do you zone for work density or just follow floor plan lines? Can you create diagonal trade flow? Do you build in buffers or hope for perfection? These questions reveal production system understanding that predicts success regardless of project type. Project-specific experience matters for knowing specialty requirements. Production system understanding matters for actually coordinating work effectively.

We’re ready to serve commercial construction projects across types, scales, and geographies with production planning systems that work universally. These are the projects we excel at and where we really like to spend our time anywhere builders are ready to implement systems that respect people and create predictable flow. As Taiichi Ohno said: “The only place success comes before work is in the dictionary.” We’ve done the work across 25+ years and diverse project types. The success comes from applying universal principles consistently.

On we go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do your methods really work the same on hospitals as apartments?

Yes. The production fundamentals zoning for work density, creating trade flow, building buffers, coordinating with time-by-location plans work universally. Hospitals add specialty requirements like infection control that modify application but don’t change underlying principles. We adapt methods to specialty requirements without abandoning production fundamentals.

What size projects do you currently handle?

Currently $10 million to $200 million as we scale organizational capacity. This captures most commercial construction. The upper bound will expand as we grow. The production planning principles work at any scale the constraint is organizational capacity to support multiple large projects simultaneously while maintaining quality.

Can you serve as construction manager if we already have a GC selected?

Yes. We often serve as CM helping GCs implement production planning systems they haven’t mastered yet. We bring Takt planning, pull planning, and Last Planner System expertise that improves how the GC coordinates work. The service model adapts to what the project needs.

What states do you currently operate in?

Arizona, Texas, Colorado, and Utah as we scale. But our consulting services extend beyond these states when projects need production planning support. Geographic presence expands based on demand. The production principles we apply work anywhere regardless of local market conditions.

Why does field experience matter if production principles are universal?

Field experience across diverse project types taught me how specialty requirements modify application without changing principles. I learned what’s truly different versus what only appears different. That distinction understanding what fundamentally changes versus what’s surface variation comes from building many project types, not from theory.

If you want to learn more we have:

Discover Jason’s Expertise:

On we go

Subscribe Now !

Sign Up & Start Learning

The Foundation of Construction Excellence

© 2026 elevate construction ist LLC All Rights Reserved. |

SUBSCRIBE NOW !

Subscribe to our newsletters and stay updated!

faq

General Training Overview

Superintendent / PM Boot Camp

Takt Production System® Virtual Training

Onsite Takt Simulation

Foreman & Field Engineer Training

Testimonials

Testimonials

agenda

Day 1

Foundations & Macro Planning

day2

Norm Planning & Flow Optimization

day3

Advanced Tools & Comparisons

day4

Buffers, Controls & Finalization

day5

Control Systems & Presentations

faq

UNDERSTANDING THE TRAINING

VALUE AND RESULTS

PLANNING AND SCHEDULING TOPICS

APPLICATION & TEAM ADOPTION

VIRTUAL FORMAT & ACCESSIBILITY

faq

GENERAL FAQS

CURRICULUM & OUTCOMES

LOGISTICS & FORMAT

PRICING & VALUE

SEO-BASED / HIGH-INTENT SEARCH QUESTIONS

agenda

Day 1

Agenda

Outcomes

Day 2

Agenda

Outcomes

Day 3

Agenda

Outcomes

Day 4

Agenda

Outcomes

Day 5

Agenda

Outcomes